Intel Core 5 213PE vs Intel Core i7-13700HX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database pits the Intel Core 5 213PE against the Intel Core i7-13700HX across 17 recorded tests, and the split is decisive: the Core i7-13700HX wins 12, while the Core 5 213PE takes 5. Yet the nature of those victories tells a more nuanced story than the raw win count suggests.

The Core i7-13700HX dominates heavily in multi-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R15 multicore, it scores 3277 against the Core 5's 2264, a 30.9% advantage. The R20 multicore test shows a 16.4% lead (11290 vs 9436). This pattern repeats across PassMark's parallel workloads: data compression favors the i7 by 23.9% (392725 vs 298804), data encryption by 28.9% (22386 vs 15916), floating point math by 20.1% (85863 vs 68587), and integer math by 21% (116617 vs 92089). The i7 also wins PassMark multithread by 19% (32637 vs 26434) and physics by 14.9% (1908 vs 1624). Extended instructions go to the i7 by 18.9% (24127 vs 19565), prime number finding by 8.1% (124 vs 114), and random string sorting by 23.2% (41717 vs 32027).

The Core 5 213PE, however, posts some striking single-thread wins. The most dramatic is Cinebench R23 single-core, where it scores 3172 against the i7's 1875, a 69.2% advantage. That is not a marginal gap; it is a generational difference in single-thread performance. Cinebench R15 single-core also goes to the Core 5 by 17.3% (319 vs 272). PassMark single-thread shows a 6.3% lead (4060 vs 3819). In Cinebench R23 multicore, the Core 5 actually wins outright: 22468 vs 20479, a 9.7% advantage, despite the i7's higher core count.

The R20 single-core test is the lone oddity: the i7 wins there by 16.4% (1593 vs 1332), which contradicts the R15 and R23 single-core results. The database records this as is, and it underscores how workload-specific these comparisons can be.

Looking at overall averages, the Core 5 213PE holds a slim edge: its average benchmark score is 35428, versus 34554 for the i7-13700HX. The Core 5 also sits at the 85th percentile against all CPUs, one point above the i7's 84th percentile. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-13700T (average score 35403, just 0.1% behind) and the Core i7-12700KF (35365, 0.2% behind). The i7-13700HX's closest competitor is the Intel Core Ultra 5 336H at 34485, a 0.2% gap, with the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X trailing by 0.9%.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel design lineages. The Core 5 213PE is built on Bartlett Lake, a desktop-oriented architecture, while the Core i7-13700HX uses Raptor Lake-HX, a mobile high-performance variant. Both are fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process and produced by Intel's own foundry, so the manufacturing node does not separate them.

Core counts differ significantly. The Core 5 213PE has 8 cores and 16 threads; the Core i7-13700HX has 16 cores and 24 threads. That extra hardware explains much of the i7's multi-thread dominance. The i7 also carries a larger L3 cache: 30 MB shared, versus 24 MB on the Core 5. Both share the same L1 configuration (80 KB per core) and L2 (2 MB per core). The i7's die size is recorded at 257 mm²; the Core 5's die size is not listed in the database.

Clock behavior also differs. The Core 5 213PE has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The i7-13700HX starts lower at 2.10 GHz base but boosts to 5.00 GHz. The Core 5's higher boost clock likely contributes to its single-thread victories, especially the massive R23 single-core result. Thermal design power goes the other way: the Core 5 is rated at 65 W, while the i7-13700HX is rated at 55 W. The i7 is the more power-frugal part on paper, despite having more cores.

Memory support is identical: both accept DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. The Core 5 records a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s; the i7's bandwidth is not listed. Both support ECC memory, a feature often valued in workstation builds. PCIe connectivity differs: the Core 5 offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the i7-13700HX provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics also differ: the Core 5 uses UHD Graphics 730, the i7 uses UHD Graphics 770.

Platforms diverge sharply. The Core 5 213PE uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop socket, and its market segment is listed as Desktop. The i7-13700HX uses Intel BGA 1964, a mobile socket, and its market segment is Mobile. The Core 5's multiplier is locked; the i7's multiplier is unlocked, allowing overclocking in suitable mobile platforms. Release dates are far apart: the Core 5 arrived on 2026-03-08, while the i7-13700HX launched on 2023-01-03.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more benchmarks overall?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700HX wins 12 of the 17 head-to-head tests, while the Intel Core 5 213PE wins 5. However, the Core 5 has a higher average benchmark score (35428 vs 34554) and a slightly better percentile ranking (85th vs 84th).

Q: How large is the single-thread performance gap?

A: The Core 5 213PE leads in Cinebench R23 single-core by 69.2% (3172 vs 1875), in R15 single-core by 17.3% (319 vs 272), and in PassMark single-thread by 6.3% (4060 vs 3819). The i7-13700HX wins R20 single-core by 16.4% (1593 vs 1332), an outlier among the single-thread results.

Q: Why does the i7-13700HX dominate multi-core tests?

A: The i7-13700HX has 16 cores and 24 threads, double the core count of the Core 5 213PE (8 cores, 16 threads). It also has a larger shared L3 cache (30 MB vs 24 MB). These structural advantages show up in Cinebench R15 multicore (30.9% lead) and PassMark data compression (23.9% lead).

Q: Is there any multi-core test the Core 5 213PE wins?

A: Yes, Cinebench R23 multicore goes to the Core 5 213PE by 9.7% (22468 vs 20479), despite the i7's higher core count. This is the only multi-threaded benchmark where the Core 5 comes out ahead.

Q: Do these processors support the same memory?

A: Both support DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, and both support ECC memory. The Core 5 213PE records a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s; the i7-13700HX's bandwidth is not listed in the database.

Q: Which processor is newer?

A: The Core 5 213PE was released on 2026-03-08, while the Core i7-13700HX was released on 2023-01-03. The Core 5 is therefore a later product, built on the Bartlett Lake architecture.

The Verdict

The data points to two very different usage profiles. The Intel Core i7-13700HX is the clear choice for heavily parallel work. Its 30.9% lead in R15 multicore, 28.9% lead in encryption, and 23.9% lead in data compression make it the stronger engine for rendering, compression, and compute-heavy tasks. The 16-core, 24-thread configuration with 30 MB of L3 cache delivers consistent wins across most multi-threaded PassMark tests. Its 55 W TDP, lower than the Core 5's 65 W, also makes it the more efficient option on paper for sustained all-core loads.

The Core 5 213PE is the single-thread specialist. The 69.2% margin in Cinebench R23 single-core is the standout result in this entire comparison, and its 5.20 GHz boost clock gives it a decisive edge in lightly threaded applications. It also wins Cinebench R23 multicore by 9.7%, which suggests its architecture scales better in certain rendering workloads despite fewer cores. The higher average benchmark score (35428) and 85th percentile ranking indicate that, on aggregate, the Core 5 is marginally the stronger overall processor in the database's measurements.

For a user prioritizing multi-thread throughput, the i7-13700HX is the safer pick. For someone who needs maximum single-core responsiveness and can accept fewer cores, the Core 5 213PE is the better option. The i7's unlocked multiplier adds flexibility for overclocking, while the Core 5's locked multiplier and desktop socket suggest a more fixed, mainstream configuration. The i7 also offers more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) and a newer integrated GPU (UHD Graphics 770 vs 730). Both processors support ECC memory, making either viable for workstation builds. The launch MSRP for the Core 5 213PE is $221, and for the Core i7-13700HX it is $485.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 213PE | Intel Core i7-13700HX |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 8 | 16 |

| Threads | 16 | 24 |

| Base Clock | 2.70 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 5.00 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 55 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 1964 |

| Architecture | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-HX |

| Die Size | Not listed | 257 mm² |

| L3 Cache | 24 MB (shared) | 30 MB (shared) |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | Not listed |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 20 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2023-01-03 |

| Launch MSRP | $221 | $485 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |

| Part Number | SA4QG | SRME5 |