Intel Core 5 213PE vs Intel Core i7-12700K Comparison

Intel
INTEL

Intel Core 5 213PE

CORE STATE Bartlett Lake
CORE SPECS 8 Cores / 16 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2.7 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 24 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 65W
ARCHITECTURE Bartlett Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Core i7-12700K

CORE STATE Alder Lake-S
CORE SPECS 12 Cores / 20 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.6 Base / 5 GHz Turbo
CACHE 25 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 125W
ARCHITECTURE Alder Lake
nm
PROCESS 10 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
2,264
3,325
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
319
272
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
9,436
12,229
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
1,332
1,726
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
22,468
19,784
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
3,172
1,850.5
passmark_data_compression
298,804
446,595
passmark_data_encryption
15,916
23,408
passmark_extended_instructions
19,565
28,885
passmark_find_prime_numbers
114
114
passmark_floating_point_math
68,587
88,035
passmark_integer_math
92,089
114,264
passmark_multithread
26,434
34,404
passmark_physics
1,624
1,790
passmark_random_string_sorting
32,027
45,805
passmark_single_thread
4,060
4,013
passmark_singlethread
4,060
4,013
3dmark_16_threads
N/A
9,276
3dmark_2_threads
N/A
2,065
3dmark_4_threads
N/A
4,011
3dmark_8_threads
N/A
7,202
3dmark_max_threads
N/A
9,979
3dmark_single_thread
N/A
1,043
geekbench_multicore
N/A
15,790
geekbench_singlecore
N/A
2,308

Analysis: Intel Core 5 213PE vs Intel Core i7-12700K

The Intel Core 5 213PE and Intel Core i7-12700K are both LGA 1700 desktop processors, but they present sharply contrasting profiles. The newer Bartlett Lake chip wins the single-threaded battle decisively, while the older Alder Lake i7 leverages its extra cores to dominate multi-threaded workloads. Benchmark data shows the Core 5 213PE edges out a narrow victory in overall average score (35428 vs 35287), but the head-to-head results tell a more complex story of trade-offs between raw core count and per-core efficiency.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The most striking result in the data is the Cinebench R23 single-core test. Here, the Intel Core 5 213PE scores 3172, a massive 71.4% ahead of the i7-12700K's 1850.5. This is the single largest delta between the two processors across all tests. The Core 5's advantage extends to the older R15 single-core benchmark, where it scores 319 versus 272, a 17.3% lead. PassMark single-thread results also favor the Core 5, with a 4060 score against the i7's 4013, though the margin is a slim 1.2%.

Multi-threaded performance tells the opposite story. The i7-12700K wins 11 of the 17 head-to-head comparisons, largely on the strength of its 12 cores and 20 threads versus the Core 5's 8 cores and 16 threads. In Cinebench R15 multi-core, the i7 posts 3325 against 2264, a 31.9% advantage. The R20 multi-core test shows a 22.8% lead for the i7 (12229 vs 9436). PassMark's multi-thread benchmark gives the i7 a 34404 score, 23.2% higher than the Core 5's 26434. Data compression is particularly lopsided: the i7 scores 446595 versus 298804, a 33.1% gap. Encryption, extended instructions, floating-point math, integer math, and random string sorting all show the i7 ahead by margins ranging from 19.4% to 32.3%.

There is one notable anomaly: Cinebench R23 multi-core. Despite the i7's core-count advantage, the Core 5 213PE wins this test with 22468 against 19784, a 13.6% lead. This contrasts sharply with the R15 and R20 results, where the i7 wins by over 20%. The PassMark find prime numbers test shows a perfect tie at 114 points each. The R20 single-core test is also interesting: the i7 wins with 1726 versus 1332, a 22.8% margin, which contradicts the Core 5's wins in R15 and R23 single-core tests. This suggests the i7's performance varies significantly across different single-threaded workloads.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split: the Intel Core 5 213PE is the choice for single-threaded and lightly-threaded applications, while the Intel Core i7-12700K is the superior multi-threaded workhorse. The Core 5's 71.4% lead in R23 single-core is not a marginal difference; it is a generational leap in per-core efficiency. For users running applications that rely on a few fast threads—such as many games, legacy software, or certain productivity tools—the Core 5 213PE offers a decisive advantage.

Conversely, the i7-12700K's 31.9% lead in R15 multi-core and its 33.1% advantage in data compression indicate it is far better suited for rendering, encoding, and heavy multitasking. The i7 also has a higher 125W TDP versus the Core 5's 65W, but the benchmark data shows the i7 translates that extra power draw into tangible performance gains in threaded workloads. The overall average benchmark scores are nearly identical (35428 vs 35287), but that metric masks the divergent strengths. Choose the Core 5 213PE for peak single-thread speed; choose the i7-12700K for multi-threaded throughput.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel generations. The Core 5 213PE is a Bartlett Lake part, while the i7-12700K is from the Alder Lake family. Both are built on Intel's 10 nm process, but the architectural choices diverge significantly. The i7-12700K features a hybrid design typical of Alder Lake-S, with 12 cores and 20 threads. The Core 5 213PE uses a more straightforward configuration of 8 cores and 16 threads.

Cache hierarchies differ as well. The Core 5 213PE has 2 MB of L2 cache per core, while the i7-12700K has 1.25 MB per core. However, the i7 compensates with a larger shared L3 cache: 25 MB versus the Core 5's 24 MB. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The i7-12700K is built on a 215 mm² die, while the Core 5's die size is not specified in the data.

Memory support is identical in type—both support DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel buses—but the Core 5 213PE lists a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the i7's bandwidth is not provided. A key difference is ECC memory: the Core 5 213PE supports it, while the i7-12700K does not. PCIe capabilities also differ: the Core 5 offers Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, whereas the i7 provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes. Integrated graphics differ too, with the Core 5 featuring UHD Graphics 730 and the i7 featuring UHD Graphics 770. The i7-12700K has an unlocked multiplier, while the Core 5 is locked. The i7 was released in November 2021; the Core 5's release date is March 2026.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, compared to the i7-12700K's 5.00 GHz.

Q: Does the i7-12700K support ECC memory?

A: No, the i7-12700K does not support ECC memory. The Core 5 213PE does support ECC memory.

Q: Which CPU is better for Cinebench R23 multi-core rendering?

A: The Core 5 213PE wins this specific test with a score of 22468, a 13.6% lead over the i7-12700K's 19784.

Q: How do the two compare in PassMark data compression?

A: The i7-12700K is significantly faster, scoring 446595 against the Core 5's 298804, a 33.1% advantage.

Q: What is the difference in core and thread counts?

A: The i7-12700K has 12 cores and 20 threads. The Core 5 213PE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Core 5 213PE has an average benchmark score of 35428, which is 0.4% higher than the i7-12700K's 35287.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PE is the clear winner in single-threaded benchmarks. It takes the Cinebench R15 single-core (319 vs 272), R23 single-core (3172 vs 1850.5), and both PassMark single-thread tests (4060 vs 4013). Its 71.4% margin in R23 single-core makes it the default pick for applications that are poorly optimized for multi-threading, such as older game engines or single-threaded simulation software. The Core 5 also wins the Cinebench R23 multi-core test, suggesting it can hold its own in some modern rendering workloads that favor higher per-core clocks.

The Intel Core i7-12700K dominates everywhere else. It wins all PassMark tests except single-thread and find prime numbers, with particularly large margins in data compression (33.1% ahead), encryption (32% ahead), and extended instructions (32.3% ahead). Its 12-core configuration gives it a major edge in Cinebench R15 and R20 multi-core tests, where it leads by 31.9% and 22.8% respectively. The i7 also wins the R20 single-core test, showing it is not entirely outclassed in single-threaded tasks. For video editing, 3D rendering, code compilation, or any workload that scales with core count, the i7-12700K is the stronger choice. For fast, responsive single-threaded performance, the Core 5 213PE is the data-backed pick.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
5 213PE
i7-12700K
Core Specs
Cores
8
12 +50.0%
Threads
16
20 +25.0%
Base Clock (GHz)
2.7
3.6 +33.3%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.2
5 -3.8%
Frequency (GHz)
2.7
3.6 +33.3%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.2
5 -3.8%
Multiplier
27
36 +33.3%
SMP CPUs
1
1 0.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
2 MB (per core)
1.25 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
24 MB (shared)
25 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
65
125 +92.3%
PL1
65 W
190W
PL2
219 W
190W
Architecture
Architecture
—
Alder Lake
Codename
Bartlett Lake
Alder Lake-S
Generation
Core 5 (Bartlett Lake)
Core i7 (Alder Lake-S)
Process Size
10 nm
10 nm
Die Size
—
215 mm²
Foundry
Intel
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR4, DDR5
DDR4, DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
76.8 GB/s
—
ECC Memory
Yes
No
DDR4 Speed
3200 MT/s
3200 MT/s
DDR5 Speed
—
4800 MT/s
Platform
Socket
Intel Socket 1700
Intel Socket 1700
Chipsets
W680, R680E, Q670e, Q670, H610E, H610
Z690, H670, B660, H610
PCIe
Gen 5, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 4, 20 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
—
P-Cores: 8 E-Cores: 4
E-Core Frequency
—
2.7 GHz up to 3.8 GHz
P-Core Turbo
—
4.9 GHz
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 730
UHD Graphics 770
Other
Market
Desktop
Desktop
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
$221
$409
Part Number
SA4QG
SRL4N
Package
FC-LGA16A
FC-LGA16A
Tj Max
100°C
100°C
View Core 5 213PE Details View Core i7-12700K Details