Intel Core 5 213PE vs Intel Core i5-14500HX Comparison

The comparison between the Intel Core 5 213PE and the Intel Core i5-14500HX is a study in contrasts: a desktop processor against a mobile processor, with the latter securing a dominant victory in the majority of benchmark tests. The data shows a clear performance hierarchy, though the desktop part claims a significant win in single-threaded PassMark testing.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i5-14500HX wins 15 of the 17 head-to-head comparisons. The margin of victory is consistent across the Cinebench suite. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the i5-14500HX scores 24,234 against the Core 5 213PE’s 22,468, a 7.3% advantage. This pattern repeats in Cinebench R20 multi-core (10,178 vs 9,436) and R15 multi-core (2,442 vs 2,264), each showing a 7.3% delta. Single-core Cinebench results follow the same trend: R23 single-core shows 3,421 against 3,172, R20 single-core shows 1,436 against 1,332, and R15 single-core shows 344 against 319, all with a delta of approximately 7.3%.

The PassMark suite reveals a wider spread of performance differences. The i5-14500HX’s largest win comes in data encryption, scoring 19,502 versus the Core 5 213PE’s 15,916 — an 18.4% advantage. Data compression also shows a substantial gap, with the i5-14500HX scoring 333,851 compared to 298,804, a 10.5% delta. Physics performance favors the mobile chip by 15%, with a score of 1,911 against 1,624. Random string sorting shows an 11.6% lead for the i5-14500HX (36,219 vs 32,027), and find prime numbers shows a 12.3% lead (130 vs 114). Smaller margins appear in extended instructions (20,019 vs 19,565, a 2.3% delta), floating point math (69,442 vs 68,587, a 1.2% delta), and integer math (95,584 vs 92,089, a 3.7% delta). The multithread test shows a 7.3% delta, with scores of 28,508 and 26,434.

The single exception is the PassMark single-thread test. Here, the Intel Core 5 213PE wins decisively with a score of 4,060 against the i5-14500HX’s 3,629. This represents an 11.9% delta in favor of the desktop chip. The same result appears for the duplicate passmark_singlethread test. The overall average benchmark scores reflect these results: the Core 5 213PE averages 35,428, while the i5-14500HX averages 35,094. The Core 5 213PE sits at the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the i5-14500HX is at the 84th percentile.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different platforms. The Intel Core 5 213PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, while the i5-14500HX is based on Raptor Lake-HX architecture. Both are fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel. The core counts differ substantially: the Core 5 213PE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the i5-14500HX has 14 cores and 20 threads. This accounts for the i5-14500HX’s consistent lead in multi-threaded workloads.

Cache configurations are identical in capacity. Both processors feature 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is also the same: both support DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. The Core 5 213PE lists a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the i5-14500HX does not have a listed bandwidth figure. Both support ECC memory and PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

Clock speeds tell a different story. The Core 5 213PE has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The i5-14500HX has a lower base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The higher boost clock on the desktop part likely explains its single-thread PassMark win. The integrated graphics differ: the Core 5 213PE uses UHD Graphics 730, while the i5-14500HX uses UHD Graphics 770. The thermal design power (TDP) is rated at 65 watts for the desktop chip and 55 watts for the mobile chip. The i5-14500HX has an unlocked multiplier, while the Core 5 213PE is locked. The i5-14500HX also has a listed die size of 257 mm². The Core 5 213PE is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700, while the i5-14500HX is a mobile processor on Intel BGA 1964.

The Verdict

Benchmark results indicate that the Intel Core i5-14500HX is the stronger performer in nearly every workload category. Its 14-core, 20-thread configuration delivers a consistent 7.3% advantage across Cinebench multi-core tests and a smaller but still positive lead in most PassMark tests. For users prioritizing multi-threaded tasks such as data compression, encryption, or physics calculations, the i5-14500HX is clearly the superior choice based on these scores. The data shows a 10.5% lead in data compression and an 18.4% lead in data encryption.

The Intel Core 5 213PE, however, holds a significant advantage in single-thread performance as measured by PassMark, scoring 11.9% higher. This suggests it may be better suited for lightly-threaded workloads that depend on peak clock speed. Its 5.20 GHz boost clock is 0.30 GHz higher than the i5-14500HX’s 4.90 GHz. The Core 5 213PE also comes with a launch MSRP of $221, a figure not available for the i5-14500HX.

The overall average benchmark scores are close (35,428 vs 35,094), but the distribution of wins is not. The i5-14500HX wins 15 tests; the Core 5 213PE wins 2. The i5-14500HX’s percentile ranking among all CPUs is 84, just one point below the Core 5 213PE’s 85.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 213PE | Intel Core i5-14500HX |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 14 |

| Threads | 16 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 2.70 GHz | 2.60 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 4.90 GHz |

| TDP | 65 W | 55 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Intel BGA 1964 |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Raptor Lake-HX |

| Generation | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake-HX Refresh) |

| Die Size | Not listed | 257 mm² |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | Not listed |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Launch MSRP | $221 | Not listed |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | Yes |

| Part Number | SA4QG | SRMXJ |

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500HX has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel Core 5 213PE has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the difference in single-thread performance?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE scores 4,060 on the PassMark single-thread test, which is 11.9% higher than the i5-14500HX’s score of 3,629.

Q: How do the two compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500HX scores 24,234, which is 7.3% higher than the Core 5 213PE’s score of 22,468.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, compared to the i5-14500HX’s 4.90 GHz.

Q: Do they support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. Both also support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor is for mobile use?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500HX is a mobile processor on Intel BGA 1964, while the Intel Core 5 213PE is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14500HX is the clear winner for multi-threaded and heavily parallel workloads. Its 14-core configuration delivers advantages across the board: 7.3% in all Cinebench multi-core tests, 10.5% in data compression, 18.4% in data encryption, 15% in physics, 12.3% in prime number finding, and 11.6% in random string sorting. This makes it the preferable choice for rendering, video encoding, and complex simulations where the extra threads can be fully utilized.

The Intel Core 5 213PE is the winner in single-thread performance, as measured by PassMark. Its 11.9% lead in that test suggests it is better suited for applications that rely on a single core or lightly threaded tasks. The higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz supports this, offering a speed advantage that the i5-14500HX cannot match with its 4.90 GHz boost. For users whose workload is dominated by single-threaded responsiveness, the Core 5 213PE holds the advantage. The two processors also differ in platform: the Core 5 213PE is for desktop builds on Socket 1700, while the i5-14500HX is for mobile systems on BGA 1964. The choice between them may ultimately be dictated by the intended form factor.