Intel Core 5 213PE vs Intel Core i5-14400F Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data shows a clear overall winner in the Intel Core 5 213PE, which takes 13 of the 17 recorded head-to-head tests. The margin is not uniform, though, and the Intel Core i5-14400F does hold its ground in several specific workloads.

The most decisive victory for the Core 5 213PE comes in the PassMark find prime numbers test, where it scores 114 against 86 for the i5-14400F, a 32.6% advantage. That is the single largest delta in either direction across the entire comparison. Integer math also favors the Core 5 213PE by a substantial 13%, with scores of 92089 versus 81524. Floating point math follows a similar pattern: 68587 for the Core 5 213PE against 61319 for the i5-14400F, an 11.9% lead.

Single-thread performance is another area where the Core 5 213PE pulls ahead. In the PassMark single thread test, it records 4060 versus 3701, a 9.7% gap. The Cinebench suite confirms the same story, but with smaller margins. Across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, both single-core and multi-core, the Core 5 213PE wins every test by 3.8% to 3.9%. For example, Cinebench R23 multi-core scores are 22468 for the Core 5 213PE and 21645 for the i5-14400F, while R23 single-core is 3172 versus 3055.

The PassMark multithread test also goes to the Core 5 213PE, 26434 to 25470, a 3.8% lead. Physics in PassMark shows a 6.6% edge for the Core 5 213PE, 1624 to 1523. These results suggest that the Core 5 213PE delivers better performance in both heavily threaded and latency-sensitive single-thread tasks.

The i5-14400F, however, wins the remaining four tests. Its largest victory is in data encryption, where it scores 16949 versus 15916, a 6.1% margin. Data compression also favors the i5-14400F, 315521 to 298804, a 5.3% lead. Random string sorting goes to the i5-14400F by 2%, 32680 to 32027, and extended instructions by 1.9%, 19937 to 19565. These wins are narrower than the Core 5 213PE's biggest victories, but they show that the i5-14400F is not simply outclassed in every workload.

Looking at the aggregate data, the Core 5 213PE records an average benchmark score of 35428, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The i5-14400F averages 32279, which is the 83rd percentile. The nearest rivals for the Core 5 213PE include the Intel Core i7-13700T at 35403 (0.1% behind), the Intel Core i7-12700KF at 35365 (0.2% behind), and the Intel Core i5-13600T at 35305 (0.3% behind). The i5-14400F sits in a different competitive bracket, with its closest rival being the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U at 32233, a 0.1% gap. This means the Core 5 213PE competes at a higher performance tier entirely.

FAQ

Q: Which processor wins more benchmark tests overall?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE wins 13 of the 17 head-to-head tests, while the Intel Core i5-14400F wins 4.

Q: What is the largest single performance gap between the two?

A: The Core 5 213PE beats the i5-14400F by 32.6% in the PassMark find prime numbers test (114 versus 86).

Q: Does the i5-14400F win in any category by a large margin?

A: Its biggest win is in PassMark data encryption, where it leads by 6.1% (16949 versus 15916). It also leads data compression by 5.3%.

Q: How do the two compare in Cinebench multi-core tests?

A: The Core 5 213PE wins every Cinebench multi-core test by 3.8%. In R23, it scores 22468 versus 21645 for the i5-14400F.

Q: Which processor has the higher single-thread score?

A: The Core 5 213PE records 4060 in the PassMark single thread test, compared to 3701 for the i5-14400F, a 9.7% advantage.

Q: What are the percentile rankings for each CPU?

A: The Core 5 213PE sits in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the i5-14400F is in the 83rd percentile.

The Verdict

The data points to the Intel Core 5 213PE as the stronger processor for users who prioritize raw compute performance. It leads in 13 of the 17 benchmarks, including all Cinebench tests, integer math, floating point math, physics, and multithread workloads. The 9.7% single-thread advantage and the 32.6% lead in prime number finding indicate that it handles both lightly threaded and heavily threaded tasks with more headroom. Its average benchmark score of 35428 places it in the 85th percentile, and its nearest rivals are higher-tier parts like the Intel Core i7-13700T and Intel Core i7-12700KF, both within 0.2% of its score.

The Intel Core i5-14400F, by contrast, is better suited to specific data-oriented tasks. Its wins in data compression, data encryption, random string sorting, and extended instructions show that it processes certain data manipulation workloads more efficiently. Its average score of 32279 places it in the 83rd percentile, and its closest competitor is the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U, which is essentially tied at 32233. For users whose workloads are dominated by encryption or compression, the i5-14400F offers a measurable edge, but in general-purpose computing, the Core 5 213PE delivers the higher scores across the board.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in core count, clock speeds, cache layout, integrated graphics, and release timing. The i5-14400F has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Core 5 213PE has 8 cores and 16 threads. Despite fewer cores, the Core 5 213PE has a higher base clock of 2.70 GHz versus 2.50 GHz, and a higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz versus 4.70 GHz.

Cache configurations also diverge. The Core 5 213PE uses 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The i5-14400F uses 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 20 MB of shared L3. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. Memory bandwidth is listed at 76.8 GB/s for the Core 5 213PE, while no figure is recorded for the i5-14400F.

The Core 5 213PE includes integrated graphics, specifically UHD Graphics 730, while the i5-14400F has no integrated graphics (N/A). Both support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in dual-channel mode, and both support ECC memory. PCIe capability is identical: Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Both use the Intel Socket 1700.

The i5-14400F has a listed die size of 215 mm², while no die size is recorded for the Core 5 213PE. Release dates differ, with the i5-14400F launching on 2024-01-07 and the Core 5 213PE on 2026-03-08. Both are currently marked as Active in production. Neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The Core 5 213PE is built on Bartlett Lake, part of the Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) generation. The i5-14400F uses Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake Refresh codename under the Core 14th Gen series. Both are manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel, and both are desktop parts.

The architectural split matters in the benchmark results. The Core 5 213PE uses 8 cores with a larger per-core L2 cache (2 MB per core) and a larger L3 pool (24 MB shared). The i5-14400F uses 10 cores with 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 20 MB of shared L3. The Core 5 213PE's higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz likely contributes to its single-thread wins, while its larger cache per core may help in integer and floating point math. The i5-14400F's two extra cores do not translate into a multi-core win in Cinebench or PassMark multithread, as the Core 5 213PE still leads those tests by 3.8%.

The i5-14400F's advantage in data compression and encryption may stem from its different core composition and cache distribution, though the exact mechanism is not recorded in the data. The Core 5 213PE's integrated UHD Graphics 730 is a notable feature difference, as the i5-14400F requires a discrete GPU for any display output. Both share the same socket, memory support, and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, so platform-level compatibility is identical.