Intel Core 5 213PE vs Intel Core 7 150U Comparison

Intel Core 5 213PE vs Intel Core 7 150U is a comparison between two actively produced Intel processors aimed at different market segments. The Core 5 213PE is a desktop part built on the Bartlett Lake architecture, while the Core 7 150U is a mobile processor from the Raptor Lake-U family. The benchmark data shows a decisive overall performance advantage for the desktop chip, which records 17 wins against the mobile chip’s 0 wins in their head-to-head tests. The average benchmark score for the Core 5 213PE is 35428, placing it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, while the Core 7 150U scores 17395 on average, landing in the 71st percentile.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PE wins every single recorded benchmark comparison against the Intel Core 7 150U. This is a complete sweep across all tested workloads, from single-threaded tasks to heavily multithreaded rendering and data processing.

The largest margins appear in multithreaded and computational workloads. In Cinebench R23 multicore, the Core 5 213PE scores 22468 versus the Core 7 150U’s 8883, a lead of 152.9%. Passmark extended instructions shows a 123.7% advantage, with scores of 19565 and 8748 respectively. Floating point math also heavily favors the desktop part, with a 99.4% delta (68587 versus 34405). These results indicate that the Core 5 213PE is substantially stronger in CPU-intensive productivity tasks such as 3D rendering, scientific calculations, and code compilation.

The Core 7 150U’s closest performance relative to its rival comes in single-threaded Passmark testing. Here, the Core 5 213PE scores 4060 against the Core 7 150U’s 3508, a smaller 15.7% delta. This suggests that while the desktop chip still leads in raw single-core speed, the mobile part’s high boost clock helps it remain competitive in lightly threaded applications. The Cinebench R15 singlecore result shows a 25.6% delta (319 versus 254), and the R20 singlecore delta is 80% (1332 versus 740), showing variability across different single-thread tests.

Given that the Core 7 150U has zero wins, the use-case split is straightforward. The Core 5 213PE is the clear choice for desktops where sustained multithreaded performance and high power draw are acceptable. The Core 7 150U, with its lower TDP and mobile socket, is designed for portable systems where battery life and thermal limits take priority over absolute performance.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural families. The Intel Core 5 213PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) generation. The Intel Core 7 150U is based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-U codename. Both are manufactured on a 10 nm process node by Intel, but their design goals diverge significantly.

Core counts differ notably. The Core 5 213PE has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Core 7 150U has 10 cores but only 12 threads. This indicates that the mobile chip likely uses a hybrid configuration with performance and efficiency cores, where some efficiency cores do not support hyper-threading. The desktop chip’s uniform 8-core, 16-thread setup appears to provide better scaling in multithreaded tests.

Clock speeds also differ. The Core 5 213PE has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Core 7 150U starts lower at 1.80 GHz base but boosts higher to 5.40 GHz. Despite the higher boost ceiling on the mobile part, the desktop chip achieves better single-thread scores in most tests, likely due to higher sustained clocks and different power delivery characteristics.

Cache hierarchies are distinct. The Core 5 213PE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Core 7 150U also has 80 KB L1 per core but only 1.25 MB L2 per core and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The desktop part’s larger L3 cache, double the mobile chip’s allocation, provides a significant advantage in workloads that benefit from larger working sets.

Memory support is similar in type, with both supporting DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration. The Core 5 213PE has a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the Core 7 150U’s bandwidth is not listed in the database. ECC memory support is present on the desktop chip but absent on the mobile chip. PCIe capabilities also differ: the Core 5 213PE uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Core 7 150U uses Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics distinguish the two as well. The Core 5 213PE pairs with UHD Graphics 730, while the Core 7 150U includes Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, a more capable integrated GPU for mobile workloads.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 7 150U has more cores with 10, but the Intel Core 5 213PE has more threads with 16 versus 12.

Q: Does the Intel Core 5 213PE support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the Core 5 213PE lists ECC memory support as true. The Core 7 150U does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the difference in L3 cache size?

A: The Core 5 213PE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Core 7 150U has 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: Which chip has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 7 150U has a higher boost clock at 5.40 GHz, compared to the Core 5 213PE’s 5.20 GHz.

Q: What are the market segments for these processors?

A: The Core 5 213PE is a desktop processor using Intel Socket 1700, while the Core 7 150U is a mobile processor using Intel BGA 1744.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The Core 5 213PE has an average benchmark score of 35428, which is more than double the Core 7 150U’s 17395.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several key specification fields. The Core 5 213PE uses 8 cores and 16 threads, whereas the Core 7 150U uses 10 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks are 2.70 GHz for the desktop chip and 1.80 GHz for the mobile chip. Boost clocks are 5.20 GHz and 5.40 GHz respectively. TDP levels are 65 watts for the Core 5 213PE and 15 watts for the Core 7 150U.

The socket types differ completely: Intel Socket 1700 for the desktop part and Intel BGA 1744 for the mobile part. The Core 5 213PE is built on the Bartlett Lake codename, while the Core 7 150U uses the Raptor Lake-U codename. Process nodes are both listed as 10 nm from Intel.

Cache configurations differ in L2 and L3. The Core 5 213PE has 2 MB of L2 per core and 24 MB of shared L3. The Core 7 150U has 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 12 MB of shared L3. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core.

Memory bandwidth is recorded at 76.8 GB/s for the Core 5 213PE, while no figure is listed for the Core 7 150U. ECC memory support is true on the desktop chip and false on the mobile chip. PCIe versions and lane counts differ: Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the Core 5 213PE, Gen 4 with 8 lanes for the Core 7 150U. Integrated graphics are UHD Graphics 730 versus Iris Xe Graphics 96EU.

The Core 5 213PE has a launch MSRP of $221, while the Core 7 150U has no recorded launch MSRP. Release dates are also different, with the Core 5 213PE listed for March 2026 and the Core 7 150U for January 2024.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark data shows a consistent pattern of dominance by the Intel Core 5 213PE. The largest margin is in Cinebench R23 multicore, where the desktop chip scores 22468 against the mobile chip’s 8883, delivering a 152.9% advantage. This result highlights the impact of the desktop chip’s higher TDP, larger cache, and 16 threads versus 12.

Passmark extended instructions shows another substantial gap. The Core 5 213PE scores 19565, while the Core 7 150U scores 8748, a 123.7% delta. Floating point math also shows a near doubling, with 68587 versus 34405, a 99.4% difference. Find prime numbers is close to doubling as well, with 114 versus 58, a 96.6% delta.

Data compression favors the desktop chip by 88.4%, with scores of 298804 and 158622. Integer math shows an 80.4% advantage (92089 versus 51057). Cinebench R20 multicore and Passmark multithread both show a 79.8% delta, with scores of 9436 versus 5248 and 26434 versus 14700 respectively. Random string sorting is 75.3% ahead (32027 versus 18269). Cinebench R23 singlecore shows a 69.1% advantage (3172 versus 1875.5). Physics tests show a 60.5% delta (1624 versus 1012). Data encryption is 58.8% ahead (15916 versus 10025).

The Cinebench R15 multicore test shows a 50.4% delta (2264 versus 1505.5). Single-core results show smaller but still clear advantages. Cinebench R15 singlecore has a 25.6% delta (319 versus 254). Cinebench R20 singlecore shows an 80% delta (1332 versus 740). Passmark single thread and singlethread both show a 15.7% delta (4060 versus 3508).

The data indicates that the Core 5 213PE is significantly faster in every measured category. The mobile Core 7 150U’s higher boost clock does not translate into a single-core win, as the desktop chip’s higher sustained performance and newer architecture produce better results across all Cinebench and Passmark tests. The nearest rival comparisons reinforce the positioning: the Core 5 213PE sits alongside desktop parts like the Intel Core i7-13700T with a 0.1% delta, while the Core 7 150U is closest to AMD Ryzen parts like the Ryzen 5 4500 with a 0.4% delta.