Intel Core 5 213PE vs Intel Core 7 150HL Comparison

Intel Core 5 213PE and Intel Core 7 150HL are both desktop processors on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, but they target different segments of the market. The Core 5 213PE is a Bartlett Lake design with 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Core 7 150HL is a Raptor Lake-PS design with 14 cores and 20 threads. The database contains complete benchmark results for the Core 5 213PE, while the Core 7 150HL has no recorded benchmark scores, which shapes the analysis below.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the Intel Core 5 213PE is the only chip with measurable performance results. The Core 7 150HL has no benchmark scores in the database, meaning there are no wins recorded for it in any test. The Core 5 213PE holds a 100% win rate in the head-to-head comparison, simply because it has data and the Core 7 150HL does not.

For workloads that rely on single-thread performance, the Core 5 213PE shows strong results. Its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3172 places it in a competitive position for everyday responsiveness, and its PassMark single-thread score of 4060 indicates solid per-core capability. The boost clock of 5.20 GHz on the Core 5 213PE supports this, as higher clock speeds typically translate to faster single-threaded execution.

For multi-threaded workloads, the Core 5 213PE also delivers. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22468 and PassMark multi-thread score of 26434 show that 8 cores with 16 threads can handle parallel tasks effectively. The Core 7 150HL, with its 14 cores and 20 threads, should theoretically have an advantage in heavily threaded applications, but without benchmark data, that advantage cannot be quantified or verified.

The Core 5 213PE additionally wins in tasks like data compression, where it scores 298804 in PassMark, and integer math, where it scores 92089. These results indicate strong performance in productivity applications that use these instruction patterns.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core 7 150HL has 14 cores and 20 threads, compared to the Intel Core 5 213PE which has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the Intel Core 7 150HL boosts to 5.00 GHz.

Q: Does the Core 7 150HL support ECC memory?

A: No, the Core 7 150HL does not support ECC memory, while the Core 5 213PE does support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor has a higher TDP?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE has a TDP of 65 watts, while the Intel Core 7 150HL has a TDP of 45 watts.

Q: What integrated graphics does each processor use?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE uses UHD Graphics 730, and the Intel Core 7 150HL uses Iris Xe Graphics 96EU.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE has an average benchmark score of 35428, and it sits in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel Core 7 150HL has an average benchmark score of 0 due to no recorded data.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark section in the database is empty, with no tests recorded for both processors simultaneously. However, the Core 5 213PE has a full suite of individual benchmark results, and those can be compared against the expectation for the Core 7 150HL based on its specifications, though no scores exist.

The Core 5 213PE records a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2264 and a single-core score of 319. In Cinebench R20, it scores 9436 multi-core and 1332 single-core. The R23 results show 22468 multi-core and 3172 single-core. These numbers indicate a processor that performs well in both lightly threaded and heavily threaded scenarios.

In PassMark testing, the Core 5 213PE shows a multi-thread score of 26434 and a single-thread score of 4060. For specialized tasks, it scores 298804 in data compression, 15916 in data encryption, 19565 in extended instructions, 114 in find prime numbers, 68587 in floating point math, 92089 in integer math, 1624 in physics, and 32027 in random string sorting.

The nearest rivals to the Core 5 213PE, based on average benchmark score, are the Intel Core i7-13700T at 35403 (0.1% difference), the Intel Core i7-12700KF at 35365 (0.2% difference), the Intel Core i5-13600T at 35305 (0.3% difference), and the Intel Core i7-12700K at 35287 (0.4% difference). These margins are extremely tight, placing the Core 5 213PE within a fraction of a percent of these established processors. The Core 7 150HL has no rivals listed and no average score, so no comparative analysis is possible.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The Core 5 213PE uses 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Core 7 150HL uses 14 cores and 20 threads. The Core 5 213PE has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, compared to the Core 7 150HL's base clock of 2.40 GHz and boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Thermal design power differs significantly: the Core 5 213PE is rated at 65 watts, while the Core 7 150HL is rated at 45 watts. Both processors use the Intel Socket 1700, so they are physically compatible with the same motherboards.

Memory support is identical for both: DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory bus. The Core 5 213PE has a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s recorded, while the Core 7 150HL has no memory bandwidth figure listed. ECC memory support is present on the Core 5 213PE but absent on the Core 7 150HL.

PCIe support differs: the Core 5 213PE offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Core 7 150HL offers Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics also differ, with the Core 5 213PE using UHD Graphics 730 and the Core 7 150HL using Iris Xe Graphics 96EU.

The release dates are different: the Core 5 213PE was released on 2026-03-08, while the Core 7 150HL was released on 2024-04-07. The Core 5 213PE has a launch MSRP of $221, while the Core 7 150HL has no launch MSRP listed. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Architecture Differences

The Core 5 213PE is based on the Bartlett Lake codename, while the Core 7 150HL is based on the Raptor Lake-PS codename with a Raptor Lake architecture. Both are manufactured by Intel on a 10 nm process node, and both are built by Intel as the foundry.

Cache structures are identical on paper: both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The total L3 cache is not separately listed for either processor.

The core count difference reflects a fundamental architectural split. The Core 7 150HL with 14 cores likely uses a hybrid design with performance and efficiency cores, common in Raptor Lake parts, while the Core 5 213PE with 8 cores and 16 threads appears to be a more uniform core design. The thread count difference (20 vs 16) suggests the Core 7 150HL has some cores without hyperthreading, given the core-to-thread ratio.

The integrated graphics difference is notable: the Core 5 213PE uses the UHD Graphics 730, while the Core 7 150HL uses the Iris Xe Graphics 96EU. The Iris Xe branding typically indicates a higher-tier integrated GPU with more execution units, which suggests the Core 7 150HL is better suited for tasks that rely on the integrated graphics.

The PCIe generation difference also points to different platform expectations. The Core 5 213PE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which is a newer standard and offers more bandwidth for discrete GPUs and NVMe drives. The Core 7 150HL supports PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes, which is an older standard with fewer lanes.

The Verdict

From the recorded data, the Intel Core 5 213PE is the clear choice for anyone who needs verified performance numbers. It achieves an 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35428. Its nearest rivals, all within 0.4% of its score, are well-known processors like the Core i7-12700K and Core i7-13700T, which places it in solid company.

The Core 7 150HL offers more cores (14 vs 8), more threads (20 vs 16), a lower TDP (45 vs 65 watts), and a better integrated GPU (Iris Xe Graphics 96EU vs UHD Graphics 730). For workloads that are heavily multi-threaded and can leverage all 14 cores, the Core 7 150HL might be expected to outperform the Core 5 213PE, but no benchmark data exists to confirm this. The database shows no scores for the Core 7 150HL, putting it at the 50th percentile with an average score of 0.

The Core 5 213PE is the only processor with demonstrated performance. It wins in every measurable category because the Core 7 150HL has no recorded results. For single-threaded tasks, the Core 5 213PE's 5.20 GHz boost clock and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3172 indicate strong responsiveness. For multi-threaded tasks, its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22468 shows it can handle parallel workloads effectively.

Users who require ECC memory support must choose the Core 5 213PE, as the Core 7 150HL lacks this feature. Users who need PCIe Gen 5 support must also choose the Core 5 213PE, since the Core 7 150HL is limited to Gen 4. Users who prioritize lower power consumption or better integrated graphics would lean toward the Core 7 150HL based on its specifications, but they would be making that choice without any performance validation.

The 65-watt TDP of the Core 5 213PE suggests it needs a more substantial cooling solution than the 45-watt Core 7 150HL, but the performance data justifies that power draw. The Core 5 213PE also has a newer release date (2026-03-08 vs 2024-04-07) and a listed launch MSRP of $221, which provides a reference point for its market positioning.

Given the absence of any benchmark scores for the Core 7 150HL, the data supports selecting the Core 5 213PE for any application where verified performance matters. The Core 7 150HL remains an unquantified option with theoretical advantages in core count and integrated graphics, but those advantages cannot be confirmed from the database.