Intel Core 5 211E vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the Intel Core 5 211E and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100. The database lists a complete set of 17 benchmark scores for the Intel part, while the Qualcomm entry has no benchmark scores recorded at all. This asymmetry means the head-to-head analysis must rely on the Intel processor's absolute scores and its percentile position, alongside the architectural specifications of the Qualcomm part.

The Intel Core 5 211E achieves an average benchmark score of 37,829 across all recorded tests. Its percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database is 86, indicating that it outperforms the majority of processors tracked. The nearest recorded rivals for the Intel part are clustered tightly around this average: the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 scores 37,804 (a delta of 0.1%), the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 scores 37,762 (0.2% delta), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37,904 (-0.2% delta), and the Intel Core i9-14901E scores 37,911 (-0.2% delta). These deltas are minimal, showing that the Core 5 211E sits within a performance band of less than 1% among these four rivals.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has a percentile ranking of 50 and an average benchmark score of 0, which reflects the absence of recorded measurements. The database lists no nearest rivals for this part, and no wins are recorded for either processor in the head-to-head category. The Intel unit holds all recorded benchmark wins by default, but the practical interpretation is that direct numerical comparison is impossible until the Qualcomm benchmark data is populated.

For the Intel part specifically, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20,389 and single-core score of 2,878 stand as the highest among its Cinebench results. The PassMark multithread score of 23,833 and single-thread score of 4,006 provide additional reference points. The data compression score of 346,757 is the highest single PassMark subtest result, while the find prime numbers score of 43 is the lowest, indicating a wide spread across workloads.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 211E demonstrates clear strengths across synthetic benchmark categories. In Cinebench R15, it records 2,055 multicore and 289 single-core points. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score reaches 8,563 and single-core reaches 1,208. The R23 results continue this pattern with 20,389 multicore and 2,878 single-core points. These scores establish a consistent performance profile across three generations of the Cinebench suite.

PassMark subtests show where the Intel part excels in specific computational tasks. Integer math scores 88,117, floating point math scores 66,402, and extended instructions score 21,592. Data encryption records 17,938, while random string sorting achieves 34,308. The physics subtest scores 702, and data compression reaches 346,757. These numbers indicate strong throughput in integer-heavy workloads and data processing tasks.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has no benchmark scores recorded, so no wins can be attributed to it from the available data. Its architectural specifications, however, suggest different intended workloads. The 12 cores and 12 threads with a 4.00 GHz base clock, combined with 152.4 GB/s memory bandwidth and LPDDR5X support, point toward a mobile-focused design. The Adreno X2-85 integrated graphics and BGA 2343 socket reinforce this mobile positioning. Without benchmark data, the database cannot confirm performance in any specific workload category for this part.

The Intel part's desktop market segment and active production status, alongside its 65 TDP and Socket 1700, indicate a desktop-oriented processor. Its DDR4 and DDR5 memory support with dual-channel configuration and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth suit traditional desktop builds. The UHD Graphics 730 integrated GPU provides basic display output capabilities. The Qualcomm part's mobile segment and 3 nm process node from TSMC suggest efficiency-focused design, but the lack of measured results prevents any quantified comparison.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core 5 211E uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) generation. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process node at Intel's foundry, with a die size of 257 mm². The processor contains 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 uses the Glymur codename and belongs to the Snapdragon X2 (Elite) generation. It is manufactured on a 3 nm process node at TSMC, with a die size of 220 mm². The processor contains 12 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 4.00 GHz and no recorded boost clock. The cache hierarchy includes 288 KB of L1 per core and 16 MB of shared L2, with no L3 cache listed.

The process node difference is significant: 10 nm for Intel versus 3 nm for Qualcomm. The smaller node typically allows for higher transistor density and improved power efficiency, though the database does not record transistor counts for either part. The die sizes are comparable, with Intel at 257 mm² and Qualcomm at 220 mm², a difference of 37 mm².

Memory support diverges clearly. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel configuration and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth. The Qualcomm part supports LPDDR5X with dual-channel configuration and 152.4 GB/s bandwidth, which is exactly double the Intel figure. The Intel processor supports ECC memory, while the Qualcomm part does not.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The Intel part provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Qualcomm part provides Gen 5 with 12 lanes (CPU only). The integrated graphics differ as well: Intel uses UHD Graphics 730, and Qualcomm uses Adreno X2-85. The Intel part's market segment is desktop with Socket 1700, while the Qualcomm part is mobile with BGA 2343.

The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $221, while the Qualcomm part has no recorded launch MSRP. Both processors are locked (multiplierUnlocked is false for each). The Intel release date is 2025-01-12, and the Qualcomm release date is 2026-04-05. The Intel part number is SRQERQ65F, and the Qualcomm part number is X2E78100.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E has 10 cores and 16 threads. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has 12 cores and 12 threads.

Q: How do the base clock speeds compare?

A: The Intel part has a base clock of 2.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The Qualcomm part has a base clock of 4.00 GHz with no recorded boost clock.

Q: What is the difference in memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel part provides 76.8 GB/s bandwidth with DDR4 and DDR5 support. The Qualcomm part provides 152.4 GB/s bandwidth with LPDDR5X support, which is double the Intel figure.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E supports ECC memory. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 does not support ECC memory.

Q: What are the process nodes and foundries?

A: The Intel part uses a 10 nm process at Intel foundry. The Qualcomm part uses a 3 nm process at TSMC foundry.

Q: What is the percentile ranking for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E ranks in the 86th percentile among all CPUs. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 ranks in the 50th percentile, though it has no recorded benchmark scores.

The Verdict

The Intel Core 5 211E delivers a complete set of benchmark results that establish its performance position. With an average score of 37,829 and an 86th percentile ranking, the data places it among competitive desktop processors. Its nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Intel Core i9-14901E, all fall within a 0.2% delta of its average score. This indicates the Core 5 211E performs in a tightly contested tier where minor score variations separate top contenders.

The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 offers no benchmark data for analysis. Its specifications show a 12-core, 12-thread design with a 4.00 GHz base clock, double the memory bandwidth of the Intel part at 152.4 GB/s, and a smaller 3 nm process node from TSMC. These features suggest a different design philosophy focused on mobile efficiency and memory throughput. The 50th percentile ranking, however, is based on no recorded scores and provides no meaningful performance signal.

For users selecting a desktop processor with measured performance data, the Intel Core 5 211E is the only part with verified benchmark results. Its 86th percentile ranking and consistent Cinebench and PassMark scores provide concrete evidence of its capabilities. The Qualcomm part, without recorded benchmarks, cannot be evaluated on performance grounds from the database. Its mobile segment, LPDDR5X memory support, and BGA socket indicate a target platform distinct from the Intel desktop part.

The data supports choosing the Intel part for desktop workloads requiring documented performance, ECC memory support, and a broad software ecosystem. The Qualcomm part, based on specifications alone, targets mobile devices with higher memory bandwidth and a more advanced manufacturing process. The absence of benchmark data for the Qualcomm part means any performance claims must remain unverified in this database.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Core 5 211E | Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 |

|----------------|-------------------|-------------------------------|

| Cores | 10 | 12 |

| Threads | 16 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 2.70 GHz | 4.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.90 GHz | Not recorded |

| TDP | 65 | Not recorded |

| Socket | Intel Socket 1700 | Qualcomm BGA 2343 |

| Codename | Bartlett Lake | Glymur |

| Generation | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) | Snapdragon X2 (Elite) |

| Process Node | 10 nm | 3 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| Die Size | 257 mm² | 220 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 288 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 16 MB (shared) |

| L3 Cache | 20 MB (shared) | Not recorded |

| Memory Support | DDR4, DDR5 | LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 152.4 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 12 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 | Adreno X2-85 |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2025-01-12 | 2026-04-05 |

| Launch MSRP | $221 | Not recorded |

| Part Number | SRQERQ65F | X2E78100 |