Intel Core 5 211E vs Intel Core 5 223PQE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the Intel Core 5 211E and the Intel Core 5 223PQE. The head-to-head benchmark field is empty, and neither processor has a recorded win in that category. This absence of direct measurement data means the analysis must rely on the recorded specifications and the available benchmark results for the Intel Core 5 211E, which has a full set of test scores, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE has no recorded benchmark scores at all.

The Intel Core 5 211E achieves an average benchmark score of 37829 across its recorded tests. This places it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals in the database are the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 with an average score of 37804 and a delta of 0.1 percent, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 with an average score of 37762 and a delta of 0.2 percent, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 with an average score of 37904 and a delta of -0.2 percent, and the Intel Core i9-14901E with an average score of 37911 and a delta of -0.2 percent. The Intel Core 5 211E sits within a narrow band of less than 0.2 percent of these rivals, indicating near-parity performance with each of them.

The Intel Core 5 223PQE, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 0 in the database and sits at the 50th percentile. This reflects the absence of recorded benchmark data rather than actual performance. The database shows no nearest rivals for the 223PQE, and no test scores are listed for any workload.

For the Intel Core 5 211E, the recorded scores show a strong multi-threaded profile. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, it scores 20389, while its single-core score is 2878. The Cinebench R20 results show 8563 multi-core and 1208 single-core, and Cinebench R15 shows 2055 multi-core and 289 single-core. PassMark results include a multi-thread score of 23833, a single-thread score of 4006, integer math at 88117, floating point math at 66402, data compression at 346757, data encryption at 17938, extended instructions at 21592, find prime numbers at 43, physics at 702, and random string sorting at 34308.

These numbers indicate a processor that handles sustained multi-threaded workloads with relative ease. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20389 is roughly seven times the single-core score of 2878, showing strong scaling across its 10 cores and 16 threads. The PassMark multi-thread score of 23833 is nearly six times the single-thread score of 4006, reinforcing that observation.

The Intel Core 5 223PQE has no comparable scores, so direct numeric comparisons cannot be made. The analysis must instead consider the specification differences, which are substantial and point to different design priorities.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core 5 211E have more cores than the Intel Core 5 223PQE?

A: Yes. The Intel Core 5 211E has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE has 8 cores and 16 threads. Both processors support 16 threads, but the 211E achieves that thread count with more physical cores.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE has a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, compared to 4.90 GHz for the Intel Core 5 211E. The 223PQE also has a higher base clock at 4.00 GHz versus 2.70 GHz for the 211E.

Q: What is the difference in L3 cache capacity between the two?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Core 5 211E has 20 MB of shared L3 cache. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 2 MB of L2 cache per core.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes. Both the Intel Core 5 211E and the Intel Core 5 223PQE support ECC memory. Both also support DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth for each processor?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE has a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel Core 5 211E has a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The difference comes from the higher base clock and other characteristics of the 223PQE.

Q: Which processor has a higher TDP?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PQE has a TDP of 125 watts, while the Intel Core 5 211E has a TDP of 65 watts. The 223PQE also uses the UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU, whereas the 211E uses the UHD Graphics 730.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 211E wins on core count. With 10 cores versus 8 cores for the 223PQE, the 211E provides more physical cores for parallel workloads that scale with core count. Its recorded benchmark data confirms this strength: the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20389 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 23833 are strong numbers that place it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs. The 211E also has a lower TDP of 65 watts, which makes it a more energy-conscious choice for systems where thermal headroom is limited.

The Intel Core 5 223PQE wins on clock speed. Its base clock of 4.00 GHz and boost clock of 5.50 GHz are both higher than the 211E's 2.70 GHz base and 4.90 GHz boost. The higher clocks should translate to better single-threaded and lightly-threaded performance, though no benchmark scores are recorded in the database to confirm this directly. The 223PQE also has a larger L3 cache at 24 MB versus 20 MB, which can improve performance for workloads with large working sets. Its memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is higher than the 211E's 76.8 GB/s, and it uses the more capable UHD Graphics 770 integrated GPU compared to the UHD Graphics 730 on the 211E.

For multi-threaded, core-heavy workloads such as rendering, compilation, or scientific computing, the Intel Core 5 211E is the better fit based on its core advantage and recorded multi-core scores. For single-threaded or lightly-threaded workloads where clock speed matters more, the Intel Core 5 223PQE has the specification advantage, though the lack of recorded benchmark data makes a definitive claim difficult.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specifications. The Intel Core 5 211E has 10 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The base clock is 2.70 GHz for the 211E and 4.00 GHz for the 223PQE. The boost clock is 4.90 GHz for the 211E and 5.50 GHz for the 223PQE. The TDP is 65 watts for the 211E and 125 watts for the 223PQE.

The L3 cache is 20 MB shared for the 211E and 24 MB shared for the 223PQE. The die size is 257 mm² for the 211E, while no die size is recorded for the 223PQE. The memory bandwidth is 76.8 GB/s for the 211E and 89.6 GB/s for the 223PQE. The integrated graphics differ: the 211E uses UHD Graphics 730, and the 223PQE uses UHD Graphics 770.

The release dates differ as well. The Intel Core 5 211E has a release date of 2025-01-12, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE has a release date of 2026-03-08. The launch MSRP for the 211E is $221, and the launch MSRP for the 223PQE is $319.

Both processors share the same socket (Intel Socket 1700), the same process node (10 nm), the same foundry (Intel), the same memory support (DDR4 and DDR5), the same dual-channel memory bus, the same PCIe configuration (Gen 5, 16 lanes CPU only), and both support ECC memory. Both also have a locked multiplier and are produced by Intel under the Bartlett Lake codename with the Core 5 generation label.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Core 5 211E and the Intel Core 5 223PQE share the same underlying architecture. Both are built on the Bartlett Lake codename and belong to the Core 5 generation. Both use a 10 nm process node from Intel's own foundry. The L1 cache is 80 KB per core for both, and the L2 cache is 2 MB per core for both.

The core configuration is the primary architectural difference. The 211E uses 10 cores with 16 threads, while the 223PQE uses 8 cores with 16 threads. This means the 223PQE relies on a higher degree of simultaneous multithreading to reach 16 threads, whereas the 211E has more physical cores. The 223PQE compensates for fewer cores with higher clock speeds and a larger L3 cache.

The L3 cache difference is notable: 20 MB shared on the 211E versus 24 MB shared on the 223PQE. This 4 MB difference can matter for workloads that repeatedly access a large dataset. The memory bandwidth also differs, with the 223PQE supporting 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s for the 211E, which can improve performance in memory-bound scenarios.

The integrated GPU differs as well. The 211E uses UHD Graphics 730, while the 223PQE uses UHD Graphics 770. The latter is a higher-tier integrated graphics solution, which may be relevant for systems that rely on the iGPU for display output or light graphics work.

Both processors support ECC memory, which is a significant feature for embedded and workstation applications where data integrity is critical. Both also support DDR4 and DDR5 memory, giving system designers flexibility in memory choice. The PCIe configuration is identical: Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

The die size is recorded for the 211E at 257 mm², but no die size is recorded for the 223PQE. This is a notable difference in the available data, though it does not directly indicate performance characteristics.

The Verdict

The database shows two processors with the same architecture but different design trade-offs. The Intel Core 5 211E offers 10 cores and 16 threads with a 65 watt TDP, a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, 20 MB of L3 cache, and 76.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth. Its recorded benchmark results place it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37829. The Intel Core 5 223PQE offers 8 cores and 16 threads with a 125 watt TDP, a boost clock of 5.50 GHz, 24 MB of L3 cache, and 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. It has no recorded benchmark scores, and its average benchmark score is 0 in the database.

For workloads that emphasize multi-threaded throughput and core count, the Intel Core 5 211E is the stronger choice. Its 10 physical cores and recorded multi-core scores, including 20389 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 23833 in PassMark multi-thread, demonstrate solid parallel performance. Its lower 65 watt TDP also makes it suitable for systems with tighter thermal constraints.

For workloads that emphasize clock speed and single-threaded responsiveness, the Intel Core 5 223PQE has the specification advantage with its 4.00 GHz base clock and 5.50 GHz boost clock. The larger 24 MB L3 cache and higher 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth are additional benefits. However, the absence of recorded benchmark data for the 223PQE means the database offers no direct performance numbers to confirm these advantages.

The release dates also differ, with the 211E released on 2025-01-12 and the 223PQE released on 2026-03-08. The launch MSRP is $221 for the 211E and $319 for the 223PQE. Both processors are currently active in production, both use the Intel Socket 1700, and both are locked from multiplier adjustment.

The data indicates that the Intel Core 5 211E is the better-documented processor with proven benchmark results, while the Intel Core 5 223PQE offers higher clock speeds and more cache but lacks recorded performance data. Users who need verified multi-core performance and lower power consumption should consider the 211E. Users who prioritize maximum clock speed and are willing to accept a higher TDP should consider the 223PQE, but should note that no benchmark scores are available to validate its performance in the database.