Intel Core 5 210H vs Intel Core 5 213PE Comparison

Intel Core 5 210H and Intel Core 5 213PE are two processors from Intel that target different market segments, and the benchmark data shows a decisive performance gap between them. The 213PE wins 17 out of 17 recorded head-to-head comparisons, with the 210H failing to secure a single victory. This analysis examines the scale of those differences, the architectural reasons behind them, and the use cases that suit each processor.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 5 213PE dominates the Intel Core 5 210H across every recorded workload. The largest gap appears in Cinebench R23 multi-core, where the 213PE scores 22468 against the 210H's 11830, a 47.3% advantage. This near-doubling of multi-threaded rendering performance indicates that the 213PE is in a different performance class for heavily parallel workloads.

Single-core performance also favors the 213PE substantially. In Cinebench R23 single-core, the 213PE records 3172 versus 1771 for the 210H, a 44.2% lead. The PassMark single-thread test shows a smaller but still significant margin: 4060 for the 213PE against 3539 for the 210H, a 12.8% difference. The single-thread gap is less extreme than the multi-thread gap, but it still gives the 213PE a clear edge in lightly threaded applications.

Cinebench R20 results reinforce the pattern. Multi-core scores are 9436 for the 213PE and 6504 for the 210H, a 31.1% difference. Single-core in R20 shows the same 31.1% gap, with scores of 1332 and 918 respectively. Cinebench R15 follows suit: the 213PE scores 2264 multi-core and 319 single-core, while the 210H manages 1757 and 247, representing 22.4% and 22.6% deficits respectively.

The PassMark suite reveals consistent advantages for the 213PE across varied computational tasks. Integer math shows a 33.2% lead (92089 versus 61503), floating point math a 34.3% lead (68587 versus 45057), and extended instructions a 31.7% lead (19565 versus 13370). Prime number finding shows the largest percentage gap in the entire dataset: the 213PE scores 114 against the 210H's 53, a 53.5% difference. Data compression favors the 213PE by 27.1% (298804 versus 217805), and data encryption by 23.4% (15916 versus 12187). Multi-thread performance in PassMark shows a 31% gap (26434 versus 18252), physics simulation a 36% gap (1624 versus 1040), and random string sorting a 26.8% gap (32027 versus 23451).

The 210H's average benchmark score sits at 24872, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. The 213PE averages 35428, which places it in the 85th percentile. The 210H's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-13620H with an average score of 24911 (0.2% higher), the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX at 24822 (0.2% lower), the Intel Core i7-11850H at 24935 (0.3% higher), and the AMD Ryzen 5 7500F at 24964 (0.4% higher). The 213PE sits alongside the Intel Core i7-13700T at 35403 (0.1% lower), the Intel Core i7-12700KF at 35365 (0.2% lower), the Intel Core i5-13600T at 35305 (0.3% lower), and the Intel Core i7-12700K at 35287 (0.4% lower). The 213PE's average score is roughly 42% higher than the 210H's, which aligns with the wide margins seen in individual benchmark tests.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel families. The 210H uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-H codename, and belongs to the Core 5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation. The 213PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) generation. Both are built on a 10 nm process node by Intel.

Core and thread counts differ in an important way. Both processors have 8 cores, but the 210H supports 12 threads while the 213PE supports 16 threads. This suggests the 210H uses a hybrid core arrangement with fewer efficient cores, while the 213PE has more simultaneous threads available for parallel workloads. The additional 4 threads in the 213PE help explain part of its multi-core advantage.

Clock speeds also favor the 213PE. The 210H has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The 213PE starts at 2.70 GHz base and boosts to 5.20 GHz. Both the higher base and higher boost contribute to the 213PE's single-thread performance lead.

Cache configuration differs significantly. Both processors share the same L1 cache at 80 KB per core and the same L2 cache at 2 MB per core. The L3 cache, however, doubles: the 213PE has 24 MB shared L3 cache, while the 210H has 12 MB. This doubled L3 cache reduces memory latency for frequently accessed data and helps the 213PE in memory-intensive workloads.

Memory support is similar on the surface: both support DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel memory buses. The 213PE adds a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the 210H has no bandwidth figure recorded. The 213PE also supports ECC memory, a feature absent from the 210H. This makes the 213PE suitable for error-sensitive computing environments.

PCIe connectivity differs in lane count. The 210H provides Gen 5 with 8 lanes (CPU only), while the 213PE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The doubled lane count gives the 213PE more headroom for expansion devices and high-throughput peripherals.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The 210H uses Iris Xe Graphics with 48 execution units, a more capable GPU for general graphics tasks. The 213PE uses UHD Graphics 730, which is a more basic integrated solution. For systems relying on integrated graphics, the 210H offers a stronger option.

Socket and market segment separate the two clearly. The 210H uses Intel BGA 1744 and is classified as a Mobile processor. The 213PE uses Intel Socket 1700 and is classified as a Desktop processor. The 210H targets laptops and portable devices, while the 213PE targets desktop systems. The 213PE also has a higher TDP at 65 watts versus 45 watts for the 210H, which gives it more thermal headroom for sustained performance.

Release dates differ by over a year. The 210H launched on 2024-12-17, while the 213PE launched on 2026-03-08. Both are listed as Active in production status.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher multi-core score in Cinebench R23?

A: The Intel Core 5 213PE scores 22468, while the Intel Core 5 210H scores 11830. The 213PE leads by 47.3%.

Q: How do the thread counts compare between the two processors?

A: Both have 8 cores, but the 210H has 12 threads while the 213PE has 16 threads. The 213PE supports 4 additional threads.

Q: Does the Intel Core 5 213PE support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the 213PE has ECC memory support. The 210H does not support ECC memory.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds for each processor?

A: The 210H boosts to 4.80 GHz, while the 213PE boosts to 5.20 GHz. The 213PE has a 0.40 GHz higher boost clock.

Q: How large is the L3 cache on each processor?

A: The 210H has 12 MB of shared L3 cache, while the 213PE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The 213PE offers double the L3 capacity.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score and percentile ranking?

A: The 213PE has an average score of 35428 and ranks in the 85th percentile. The 210H has an average score of 24872 and ranks in the 77th percentile.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several recorded specifications. The 210H has 8 cores and 12 threads, while the 213PE has 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clock speeds are 2.20 GHz for the 210H and 2.70 GHz for the 213PE. Boost clocks are 4.80 GHz and 5.20 GHz respectively. TDP values are 45 watts for the 210H and 65 watts for the 213PE.

Socket types differ: the 210H uses Intel BGA 1744, while the 213PE uses Intel Socket 1700. The 210H uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-H codename, while the 213PE lists no architecture but uses the Bartlett Lake codename. Generations differ as well: the 210H is from Core 5 (Raptor Lake Refresh), and the 213PE is from Core 5 (Bartlett Lake).

L3 cache differs at 12 MB for the 210H versus 24 MB for the 213PE. Memory bandwidth is recorded only for the 213PE at 76.8 GB/s. ECC memory support is present on the 213PE but absent on the 210H. PCIe lane counts are 8 for the 210H and 16 for the 213PE, both Gen 5. Integrated graphics differ: Iris Xe Graphics 48EU on the 210H versus UHD Graphics 730 on the 213PE.

Market segments differ: the 210H is Mobile, while the 213PE is Desktop. Release dates are 2024-12-17 for the 210H and 2026-03-08 for the 213PE. Launch MSRP values are $342 for the 210H and $221 for the 213PE. Part numbers are SRQ6RQ5MN for the 210H and SA4QG for the 213PE.

The Verdict

The benchmark data indicates that the Intel Core 5 213PE is the stronger processor in every measured category. It wins all 17 head-to-head comparisons with margins ranging from 12.8% in PassMark single-thread to 53.5% in prime number finding. Its 85th percentile ranking versus the 210H's 77th percentile confirms its higher standing in the overall CPU landscape.

The architectural advantages of the 213PE are clear: 4 additional threads, a 0.50 GHz higher base clock, a 0.40 GHz higher boost clock, double the L3 cache, and double the PCIe lanes. These differences translate directly into the measured performance gaps. The 213PE also supports ECC memory and has a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, features that the 210H lacks.

The 210H is not without merit. Its integrated Iris Xe Graphics with 48 execution units is a more capable GPU than the UHD Graphics 730 in the 213PE. Its lower 45 watt TDP makes it suitable for mobile platforms where power draw matters. Its BGA 1744 socket and Mobile market segment indicate a design intended for laptops.

The 213PE's 65 watt TDP and Socket 1700 point to a desktop-oriented design. Its higher average score of 35428 versus 24872 for the 210H shows a 42% overall performance advantage. The nearest rival data confirms that the 213PE competes with desktop processors like the Intel Core i7-12700K and i7-12700KF, while the 210H sits alongside mobile processors like the Intel Core i7-13620H and AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PE wins in all compute-heavy scenarios. Multi-threaded rendering tasks like Cinebench R23 favor it by 47.3%. Mathematical workloads show large leads: integer math by 33.2%, floating point math by 34.3%, and prime number finding by 53.5%. Data compression and encryption favor the 213PE by 27.1% and 23.4% respectively. Systems that require ECC memory support can only use the 213PE, as the 210H lacks this feature.

The Intel Core 5 210H wins in scenarios where its integrated graphics matter more than raw CPU throughput. Its Iris Xe Graphics with 48 execution units provides a stronger built-in display solution than the UHD Graphics 730 found in the 213PE. The 210H's lower 45 watt TDP also makes it the more power-efficient choice for mobile devices, where thermal and battery constraints are critical. Its BGA 1744 socket and Mobile classification mean it is designed for laptops and portable systems.

The 213PE is the clear choice for desktop users who need maximum CPU performance across single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The 210H serves the mobile market where its integrated graphics and lower power draw are prioritized over peak compute performance. The data does not show any benchmark category where the 210H outperforms the 213PE, so the decision rests on platform requirements rather than performance comparisons.