Intel Core 5 130HL vs Intel Core 5 213PE Comparison

Intel Core 5 130HL and Intel Core 5 213PE are both 16-thread desktop processors on the Intel Socket 1700 platform, but they target different corners of the market. The 130HL is a Raptor Lake-PS part with 12 cores and a 45 W TDP, while the 213PE is a Bartlett Lake part with 8 cores and a 65 W TDP. The data in the database shows a clear split: the 213PE dominates every recorded benchmark, while the 130HL has no benchmark scores listed at all. This makes the comparison one-sided in the available measurements, but the architectural differences explain why the 213PE is the stronger performer.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 5 213PE wins every benchmark category recorded in the database. It has 17 wins across all head-to-head benchmark comparisons, while the 130HL has zero recorded wins. The 213PE holds an 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs, whereas the 130HL sits at the 50th percentile. This percentile gap is the first indicator of the performance gulf between the two.

The 213PE’s wins span both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads. In Cinebench R23, it scores 22468 points in multicore and 3172 points in singlecore. The 130HL has no Cinebench scores in the database, so the comparison can only be made using the 213PE’s recorded results and its percentile position. The 213PE also wins in PassMark tests covering integer math, floating point math, data compression, data encryption, and extended instructions.

The 130HL does not win anywhere in the recorded data. Its only distinction is its lower 45 W TDP, which makes it a lower-power part compared to the 213PE’s 65 W TDP. For workloads that prioritize power efficiency over raw throughput, the 130HL would be the logical choice, but the database shows no benchmark where it outperforms the 213PE.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different Intel families. The 130HL uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-PS codename, while the 213PE uses the Bartlett Lake codename. Both are built on a 10 nm process node at Intel’s foundry, so the manufacturing process is identical.

The core counts differ significantly. The 130HL has 12 cores and 16 threads, while the 213PE has 8 cores and 16 threads. Both support 16 threads, which means the 213PE uses hyperthreading more aggressively across fewer physical cores. The 130HL has more physical cores, but the 213PE compensates with higher clock speeds.

Clock speeds favor the 213PE. The 130HL has a 2.60 GHz base clock and a 4.80 GHz boost clock. The 213PE has a 2.70 GHz base clock and a 5.20 GHz boost clock. The 213PE boosts 400 MHz higher, which directly contributes to its single-thread performance advantage.

Cache layouts also differ. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 2 MB of L2 cache per core. The shared L3 cache is where they diverge: the 130HL has 18 MB shared L3, while the 213PE has 24 MB shared L3. The 213PE carries 6 MB more L3 cache, which benefits workloads that repeatedly access a larger working set.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The 130HL uses Iris Xe Graphics with 80 execution units, while the 213PE uses the more modest UHD Graphics 730. The 130HL is the better choice for systems relying on the iGPU, though the 213PE’s graphics are sufficient for basic display output.

PCIe support is another differentiator. The 130HL provides PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU. The 213PE provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The 213PE offers both a newer PCIe generation and twice the lane count, which matters for high-bandwidth add-in cards and NVMe storage.

ECC memory support is exclusive to the 213PE. The 130HL does not support ECC memory, while the 213PE does. This makes the 213PE suitable for reliability-focused builds where data integrity is critical.

Release dates place the 130HL earlier. The 130HL launched on April 7, 2024, while the 213PE launched on March 8, 2026. The 213PE is the newer design, and its architecture reflects that.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the 130HL and the 213PE. The 213PE has a full set of benchmark scores, but the 130HL has none. This means the performance analysis relies on the 213PE’s absolute scores and its position relative to other CPUs in the database.

The 213PE’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 22468 places it in strong company. Its nearest rivals in the database are the Intel Core i7-13700T with an average score of 35403 and a delta of 0.1 percent, the Intel Core i7-12700KF with 35365 and a delta of 0.2 percent, the Intel Core i5-13600T with 35305 and a delta of 0.3 percent, and the Intel Core i7-12700K with 35287 and a delta of 0.4 percent. The 213PE’s average benchmark score is 35428, which puts it marginally ahead of all four rivals by less than half a percent.

In Cinebench R15, the 213PE scores 2264 in multicore and 319 in singlecore. In Cinebench R20, it scores 9436 in multicore and 1332 in singlecore. These results show a consistent pattern: the 213PE is strong in both multi-threaded and single-threaded workloads, with the singlecore scores being particularly notable given its 5.20 GHz boost clock.

PassMark results reinforce the multi-threaded strength. The 213PE scores 26434 in multithread, 92089 in integer math, 68587 in floating point math, 298804 in data compression, 15916 in data encryption, and 19565 in extended instructions. The single-thread score is 4060 across two recorded PassMark entries with identical values.

The 213PE’s average benchmark score of 35428 and its 85th percentile ranking indicate it sits well above the median CPU in the database. The 130HL’s 50th percentile ranking places it at the median, but without recorded benchmark scores, the exact magnitude of the performance gap cannot be quantified from the database.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: The Intel Core 5 130HL has 12 cores, while the Intel Core 5 213PE has 8 cores. Both have 16 threads.

Q: Does the Intel Core 5 213PE support ECC memory?

A: Yes, the 213PE supports ECC memory. The 130HL does not support ECC memory.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two processors?

A: The 130HL has a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, while the 213PE has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The 213PE boosts 400 MHz higher.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The 213PE has 24 MB shared L3 cache, while the 130HL has 18 MB shared L3 cache.

Q: What PCIe generation does each processor support?

A: The 130HL supports PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU. The 213PE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The 213PE ranks in the 85th percentile, while the 130HL ranks in the 50th percentile.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in core count, clock speeds, TDP, cache, PCIe support, memory bandwidth, ECC support, integrated graphics, codename, release date, part number, and launch MSRP.

The 130HL has 12 cores, a 2.60 GHz base clock, a 4.80 GHz boost clock, and a 45 W TDP. The 213PE has 8 cores, a 2.70 GHz base clock, a 5.20 GHz boost clock, and a 65 W TDP.

The L3 cache is 18 MB shared on the 130HL and 24 MB shared on the 213PE. The 213PE also records a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, while the 130HL has no memory bandwidth figure in the database.

PCIe support: the 130HL uses PCIe Gen 4 with 8 CPU lanes, the 213PE uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. ECC memory is unsupported on the 130HL and supported on the 213PE.

Integrated graphics: the 130HL uses Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, the 213PE uses UHD Graphics 730.

The codename differs: Raptor Lake-PS for the 130HL, Bartlett Lake for the 213PE. The release date is April 7, 2024 for the 130HL and March 8, 2026 for the 213PE. The 213PE has a launch MSRP of $221. The 130HL has no launch MSRP listed. The 213PE has a part number of SA4QG, while the 130HL’s part number is unknown.

The Verdict

The Intel Core 5 213PE is the stronger processor in every recorded benchmark. Its 85th percentile ranking, 22468 Cinebench R23 multicore score, 3172 Cinebench R23 singlecore score, and 35428 average benchmark score place it in the upper tier of desktop CPUs. Its nearest rivals, the Intel Core i7-13700T, i7-12700KF, i5-13600T, and i7-12700K, all trail by less than half a percent, which confirms the 213PE competes at a high level.

The Intel Core 5 130HL has no recorded benchmark scores and a 50th percentile ranking. Its advantages are limited to a lower 45 W TDP and a more capable integrated GPU in the Iris Xe Graphics 80EU. For a build that needs basic compute with lower power draw and better iGPU performance, the 130HL is the relevant option.

For workloads that demand CPU throughput, the 213PE is the clear choice. It delivers higher clock speeds, more L3 cache, PCIe Gen 5 support, ECC memory, and a newer release date. The 213PE also carries a launch MSRP of $221, which positions it as a mainstream desktop part. The 130HL is a lower-power alternative, but the database shows no performance scenario where it beats the 213PE.