Intel Core 3 305 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 Comparison
Intel Core 3 305
Snapdragon X2E-78-100
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core 3 305 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100
The Verdict
The data positions the Intel Core 3 305 as a measured, mid-range mobile processor with a complete set of benchmark results, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 lacks any recorded benchmark scores. The Intel chip achieves a 72nd percentile ranking against all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 18,302. Its nearest rivals, the Intel Core i3-14100 (18,318) and Intel Core 5 330 (18,345), sit nearly identically, with delta percentages of -0.1% and -0.2% respectively. The AMD Ryzen 5 2600E trails slightly at 18,230, a 0.4% difference. For any workload requiring proven compute performance, the Intel Core 3 305 is the only option with verifiable data. The Snapdragon X2E-78-100, despite its 12 cores and higher base clock, has no recorded measurements, leaving its real-world performance undefined.
Architecture Differences
The Intel Core 3 305 uses the Wildcat Lake codename, built on Intel's 3 nm process. It packs 6 cores and 6 threads, with a base clock of 1.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. Its thermal design power is 15 W, and it fits the Intel BGA 1516 socket. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1, 2.5 MB of L2, and 6 MB of shared L3. Memory support covers DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a single-channel bus, delivering 59.7 GB/s of bandwidth. The processor provides PCIe Gen 4 with 6 lanes (CPU only) and integrates Intel Xe3 Graphics with 1 Xe core. It launched on April 15, 2026, with a launch MSRP of $309.
The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100, codenamed Glymur, also uses a 3 nm node but is fabricated by TSMC. It features 12 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 4.00 GHz and no listed boost clock. The die size measures 220 mm². Its cache configuration includes 288 KB of L1 per core and 16 MB of shared L2, with no L3 listed. Memory support is limited to LPDDR5X over a dual-channel bus, reaching 152.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The chip uses PCIe Gen 5 with 12 lanes (CPU only) and carries Adreno X2-85 integrated graphics. It fits the Qualcomm BGA 2343 socket and was released on April 5, 2026. No TDP, launch MSRP, or benchmark data are recorded for this part. The Snapdragon's dual-channel memory bus provides significantly higher bandwidth, and its PCIe Gen 5 support doubles the lane count, but the absence of measured performance leaves these advantages unverified.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries between the Intel Core 3 305 and the Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100. The Intel chip, however, has a full suite of 17 recorded scores. In Cinebench R15, it posts 1,322 multicore and 186 singlecore. Cinebench R20 shows 5,511 multicore and 777 singlecore. Cinebench R23 delivers 13,123 multicore and 1,852 singlecore. PassMark tests show 146,857 in data compression, 11,019 in data encryption, 13,543 in extended instructions, 115 in find prime numbers, 42,284 in floating point math, 32,295 in integer math, 15,439 in multithread, 1,233 in physics, 17,623 in random string sorting, and 3,977 in single thread. The Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has no recorded scores in any of these tests, so no direct numerical comparison is possible. The Intel chip's average benchmark score of 18,302 places it near the Core i3-14100 and Core 5 330, confirming its position in the mid-range mobile segment.
FAQ
Q: Which processor has more cores?
A: The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has 12 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 3 305 has 6 cores and 6 threads.
Q: What is the base clock difference between the two?
A: The Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has a base clock of 4.00 GHz, while the Intel Core 3 305 has a base clock of 1.50 GHz. The Intel chip boosts to 4.30 GHz, but the Snapdragon has no listed boost clock.
Q: How does memory bandwidth compare?
A: The Snapdragon X2E-78-100 uses a dual-channel LPDDR5X bus with 152.4 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel Core 3 305 uses a single-channel bus supporting DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with 59.7 GB/s of bandwidth.
Q: Which chip has recorded benchmark scores?
A: Only the Intel Core 3 305 has benchmark scores in the database. The Snapdragon X2E-78-100 has no recorded measurements, and its average benchmark score is 0.
Q: What is the process node for each processor?
A: Both use a 3 nm process node. Intel fabricates the Core 3 305 in-house, while TSMC fabricates the Snapdragon X2E-78-100.
Q: How does the Intel chip rank among all CPUs?
A: The Intel Core 3 305 sits at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs in the database. The Snapdragon X2E-78-100 sits at the 50th percentile, though with no benchmark data supporting that position.
Where Each One Wins
The Intel Core 3 305 wins in every measurable category because it is the only chip with recorded data. Its benchmark results span rendering, compression, encryption, and math workloads, giving it a defined performance profile. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13,123 and PassMark multithread score of 15,439 indicate strong parallel throughput for its 6-core configuration. The single-thread PassMark score of 3,977 and Cinebench R23 singlecore of 1,852 show capable single-core execution. Its 72nd percentile ranking confirms it outperforms the majority of CPUs in the database.
The Qualcomm Snapdragon X2E-78-100 cannot claim a single benchmark win due to the absence of recorded scores. Its architectural advantages, such as 12 cores, a 4.00 GHz base clock, dual-channel memory with 152.4 GB/s bandwidth, PCIe Gen 5 with 12 lanes, and a 220 mm² die, suggest potential in memory-intensive and multi-threaded scenarios. The larger L2 cache of 16 MB shared versus 2.5 MB on the Intel chip could benefit workloads with high data locality. However, without measurements, these remain theoretical advantages. The database records no wins for either chip in head-to-head tests, leaving the Intel Core 3 305 as the sole processor with demonstrated performance.