Intel Core 3 100U vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100 Comparison
Intel Core 3 100U
Snapdragon X1P-26-100
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: Intel Core 3 100U vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100
The database has a fundamental asymmetry for this comparison. The Intel Core 3 100U has a full set of recorded benchmarks, while the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100 has an empty benchmark list. The Intel part averages 16148 and ranks at the 70th percentile of all CPUs. The Qualcomm part averages 0 and ranks at the 50th percentile. No head-to-head benchmark entries are recorded for the pair.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The head-to-head table is empty, and the win counters for both processors are 0. There are no paired Cinebench or PassMark runs in the database. The only measured scores available for this comparison belong to the Intel Core 3 100U.
The Intel part's nearest rivals place its average score in context. The Core i7-10850H has an average score of 16204, a delta of -0.3%. The Core i5-10600KF has 16228, -0.5%. The Core i7-1260U has 16320, -1.1%. The Ryzen 5 4600H has 16341, -1.2%. The Core 3 100U trails all four by 0.3 to 1.2 percentage points.
In Cinebench, the Intel part scores 1070 multi-core and 150 single-core in R15, 4462 multi-core and 629 single-core in R20, and 10624 multi-core and 1499 single-core in R23. The Qualcomm part has no Cinebench scores.
In PassMark, the Intel part records 136497 in data compression, 8128 in data encryption, 7894 in extended instructions, 52 in find prime numbers, 28322 in floating point math, 39580 in integer math, 12522 in multithread, 876 in physics, 15191 in random string sorting, and 3506 in single-thread. The Qualcomm part has no PassMark scores.
Because the Qualcomm part has no benchmark entries, there are no Qualcomm wins in the recorded data. The Intel part is the only processor with observed results in any benchmark category.
The Verdict
Strictly from the data, the Intel Core 3 100U is the only processor in this pair with benchmark evidence. It has an average score of 16148, a 70th percentile rank, and recorded results in Cinebench and PassMark. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100 has an average score of 0, a 50th percentile rank, and no recorded results. For any workload represented by the measured categories, the data supports the Intel part. The data does not support a performance-based selection of the Qualcomm part, because no performance data exists for it.
Architecture Differences
The Intel Core 3 100U uses Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-U codename. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel. The Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100 has no architecture field listed, uses the Oryon codename, belongs to the Snapdragon X (Plus) generation, and is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Qualcomm part's manufacturer field is listed as Unknown.
The core configurations differ. The Intel part has 6 cores and 8 threads. The Qualcomm part has 8 cores and 8 threads. Both use a dual-channel memory bus, but the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5, while the Qualcomm part supports LPDDR5X and lists a memory bandwidth of 135.2 GB/s.
Cache organization also differs. The Intel part has 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 10 MB of shared L3. The Qualcomm part has 288 KB of L1 per core, 12 MB of L2 per module, and 6 MB of shared L3. The L2 design is per-core on Intel and per-module on Qualcomm.
Other feature differences: Intel uses UHD Graphics 64EU, Qualcomm uses Adreno X1-45. Intel lists PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only), Qualcomm lists PCIe Gen 4 with 12 lanes (CPU only). Both are mobile, active, dual-channel, non-ECC, and locked.
Specification Differences
The following table lists the fields where the two processors differ.
| Field | Intel Core 3 100U | Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Intel | Unknown |
| Cores | 6 | 8 |
| Base clock | 1.20 | 3.00 |
| Boost clock | 4.70 | None listed |
| TDP | 15 | 25 |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1744 | Qualcomm BGA 2073 |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake | None listed |
| Codename | Raptor Lake-U | Oryon |
| Generation | Core 3 (Raptor Lake-U) | Snapdragon X (Plus) |
| Process node | 10 nm | 4 nm |
| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 288 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 12 MB (per module) |
| L3 cache | 10 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Memory support | DDR4, DDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory bandwidth | None listed | 135.2 GB/s |
| PCIe | Gen 4, 8 Lanes(CPU only) | Gen 4, 12 Lanes(CPU only) |
| Integrated graphics | UHD Graphics 64EU | Adreno X1-45 |
| Release date | 2024-01-07 | 2024-08-27 |
| Launch MSRP | $426 | None listed |
| Part number | SRMYL | X1P26100 |
| Average benchmark score | 16148 | 0 |
| Percentile vs all CPUs | 70 | 50 |
| Benchmark entries | Cinebench R15/R20/R23 and PassMark scores | None |
FAQ
Q: Does the Qualcomm Snapdragon X1P-26-100 have any recorded benchmark scores?
A: No. Its benchmark list is empty. The Intel Core 3 100U has Cinebench R15, R20, and R23 scores plus PassMark scores.
Q: Which processor has more cores?
A: The Qualcomm part has 8 cores. The Intel part has 6 cores. Both have 8 threads.
Q: What clocks are listed?
A: The Intel part has a base clock of 1.20 and a boost clock of 4.70. The Qualcomm part has a base clock of 3.00 and no boost clock listed.
Q: Which processor has larger caches?
A: The Intel part has 10 MB of shared L3, while the Qualcomm part has 6 MB of shared L3. The Qualcomm part has 288 KB of L1 per core and 12 MB of L2 per module; the Intel part has 80 KB of L1 per core and 1.25 MB of L2 per core.
Q: What memory support is listed?
A: The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 on a dual-channel bus. The Qualcomm part supports LPDDR5X on a dual-channel bus and lists 135.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
Q: What process nodes are used?
A: The Intel part is on a 10 nm process at Intel. The Qualcomm part is on a 4 nm process at TSMC.
Where Each One Wins
The recorded head-to-head win counters are 0 for both processors, so there is no direct match result. For benchmark categories, the Intel Core 3 100U is the only part with scores, so every category win belongs to it.
For multi-threaded workloads, the Intel part has Cinebench R23 multi-core 10624, R20 multi-core 4462, R15 multi-core 1070, and PassMark multithread 12522. The Qualcomm part has no scores in these categories.
For single-threaded workloads, the Intel part has Cinebench R23 single-core 1499, R20 single-core 629, R15 single-core 150, and PassMark single-thread 3506. The Qualcomm part has no scores in these categories.
For data and math workloads, the Intel part has PassMark data compression 136497, data encryption 8128, extended instructions 7894, find prime numbers 52, floating point math 28322, integer math 39580, physics 876, and random string sorting 15191. The Qualcomm part has no scores in these categories.
The use-case split from the data is one-sided: Intel is the only processor with measured wins, and Qualcomm has no recorded benchmark wins in any category.