AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516 vs Intel Core i5-1240P Comparison

The recorded data presents a clear split in performance between the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516 and the Intel Core i5-1240P, with the outcome heavily dependent on the specific benchmark generation. The Intel part claims the majority of victories across the Cinebench suite, but the AMD processor secures a decisive win in the most demanding multi-threaded test. This divergence highlights distinct architectural priorities that go beyond simple core counts.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i5-1240P takes an early lead in the Cinebench R15 tests. In the multi-core run, the Intel chip scores 1566.5 against the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516’s 1141, a margin of 27.2% in favor of Intel. The single-core result is even more pronounced, with Intel scoring 226 versus AMD’s 161, a 28.8% deficit for the Ryzen part. This establishes a pattern where Intel’s higher boost clock and newer architecture deliver superior short-duration workload performance.

Moving to Cinebench R20, the gap narrows but Intel still holds a comfortable advantage. The Intel Core i5-1240P records 5632 points in the multi-core test, which is 15.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516’s 4758. In single-core R20, Intel again wins with 795 versus 671, a 15.6% lead. These results suggest that while Intel’s advantage persists, the relative performance difference is smaller in this newer test iteration, possibly reflecting better scaling of AMD’s Zen 2 architecture under sustained load.

The most significant reversal occurs in Cinebench R23 multi-core. Here, the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516 scores 11329, while the Intel Core i5-1240P manages 9392. This gives AMD a substantial 20.6% victory, a dramatic swing from the earlier multi-core tests. The single-core R23 result is essentially a tie, with Intel scoring 1600 and AMD scoring 1599, a difference of only 0.1%. This near-identical single-core score in the latest test suggests that architectural efficiency improvements in Zen 2 have closed the per-thread gap that was so evident in older tests.

Overall, the head-to-head record shows Intel winning 5 out of 6 benchmarks. However, the magnitude of AMD’s win in R23 multi-core is notable. The data indicates that for sustained, heavily threaded rendering workloads, the AMD part is the stronger performer, while Intel excels in lighter or shorter tasks. The average benchmark scores reflect this mixed picture, with AMD at 3277 and Intel at 3202, a difference of just over 2% in favor of AMD, despite Intel’s higher number of individual benchmark wins.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516 has an average benchmark score of 3277, while the Intel Core i5-1240P scores 3202. This places AMD slightly ahead in the overall aggregate, despite Intel winning more individual head-to-head tests.

Q: How do the two chips compare in Cinebench R23 multi-core performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516 significantly outperforms the Intel Core i5-1240P in this test. AMD scores 11329, which is 20.6% higher than Intel’s 9392.

Q: What is the performance difference in single-core Cinebench R15?

A: The Intel Core i5-1240P is clearly faster in this older single-threaded test. Intel scores 226, while AMD scores 161, resulting in a 28.8% advantage for Intel.

Q: Are there any benchmark results where the two processors are nearly equal?

A: Yes, in Cinebench R23 single-core, the Intel Core i5-1240P scores 1600 and the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516 scores 1599, a difference of only 0.1%. This is effectively a tie.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-1240P has 12 cores and 16 threads. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516 has 6 cores and 12 threads. Intel offers double the core count.

Q: How do the nearest rivals compare to each processor’s average score?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516’s average score of 3277 is matched exactly by the Intel Core i3-12100T with a 0% delta, and it is 0.4% ahead of the Intel Xeon E5-1680 v3. The Intel Core i5-1240P’s average of 3202 is 0.1% behind the Intel Core i3-13100T and 0.5% ahead of the Intel Atom P5342.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent fundamentally different design philosophies and manufacturing approaches. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516 is built on a 7 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Core i5-1240P uses Intel’s 10 nm process. This process node difference contributes to the AMD chip’s smaller die size of 156 mm² compared to Intel’s 217 mm². The transistor count also differs, with AMD integrating 9,800 million transistors, while Intel’s count is not recorded in the database.

The core architectures are distinct generations. AMD uses the Zen 2 architecture with the Renoir codename, part of the Ryzen Embedded 2000 series, released in November 2020. Intel uses the Alder Lake architecture with the Alder Lake-P codename, part of the Core i5 generation, released in February 2022. The Intel chip employs a hybrid architecture with 12 cores and 16 threads, which is double the core count of the AMD part’s 6 cores and 12 threads.

Cache configurations also differ substantially. The AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516 has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core i5-1240P has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. Intel’s larger cache hierarchy likely contributes to its strong single-thread performance in certain tests.

Memory support shows another key divergence. The AMD chip supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and it supports ECC memory. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also with a dual-channel bus, but its memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database, and it does not support ECC memory. For PCIe, AMD offers Gen 3 with 20 lanes, while Intel offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes, giving Intel a newer interface standard.

Integrated graphics differ as well. AMD includes Radeon Graphics with 384 shader processors, while Intel includes Iris Xe with 80 execution units. The Intel part is classified as a mobile processor, whereas the AMD part is classified as a desktop processor. Both have locked multipliers, and their production status is listed as active.

The Verdict

The benchmark data suggests a nuanced choice depending on workload priorities. For users or systems that prioritize sustained multi-threaded rendering performance, the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516 is the clear winner, as evidenced by its 20.6% lead in Cinebench R23 multi-core. Its higher average benchmark score of 3277 also supports this conclusion as a general aggregate measure.

However, for applications that rely on lighter or shorter workloads, the Intel Core i5-1240P demonstrates superior performance. It wins all older Cinebench R15 and R20 tests, with margins ranging from 15.5% to 28.8%. The Intel part’s 12 cores and 16 threads provide a raw resource advantage, but this does not translate into a win in the most modern multi-threaded test, where AMD’s architecture appears more efficient under sustained load.

The near-tie in Cinebench R23 single-core (0.1% difference) indicates that in the latest benchmark generation, per-thread performance is effectively equal. This nullifies Intel’s earlier single-core advantage and leaves its wins in older tests as historical artifacts rather than current capabilities.

Given the data, the AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516 is the better choice for workloads that are heavily threaded and sustained over time, such as long rendering tasks. The Intel Core i5-1240P is preferable for mixed or burst workloads where its higher boost clock and larger core count can be leveraged in shorter operations. The choice should be driven by the specific benchmark profile of the target application.

Specification Differences

The table below outlines the key specification differences between the two processors, based solely on the recorded data.

| Specification | AMD Ryzen Embedded V2516 | Intel Core i5-1240P |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 6 | 12 |

| Threads | 12 | 16 |

| Base Clock | 2.10 GHz | 1700.00 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 3.95 GHz | 4.40 GHz |

| TDP | 10 W | 28 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP6 | Intel BGA 1744 |

| Architecture | Zen 2 | Alder Lake |

| Codename | Renoir | Alder Lake-P |

| Process Node | 7 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 9,800 million | Not recorded |

| Die Size | 156 mm² | 217 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR4 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 3, 20 Lanes | Gen 4, 20 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics 384SP | Iris Xe 80EU |

| Market Segment | Desktop | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2020-11-09 | 2022-02-22 |

| Part Number | 100-000000243 | SRLD9 |