AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 vs Intel Processor U301L Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains no recorded head-to-head measurements for the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 against the Intel Processor U301L. Both processors have an empty benchmark array, a zero average benchmark score, and no nearest rivals listed. The wins tally shows zero for each part. Without measured results, the data cannot establish a performance hierarchy between these two mobile processors.

The absence of benchmark data does not imply parity. The recorded specifications suggest substantial differences in core configuration, clock behavior, memory architecture, and graphics capability. However, the database rules require that analysis remain strictly within measured results. Since no scores exist, the head-to-head comparison is limited to the specification fields where the two parts differ, which are detailed in later sections.

The percentile ranking for both CPUs is identical at 50, placing each at the median of all processors in the database. This percentile is based on the aggregate of recorded benchmarks, and with no benchmark entries, the percentile reflects a default position rather than a measured outcome. The average benchmark score of zero for both parts confirms the absence of any validated performance data.

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Processor U301L has 5 cores and 6 threads. The AMD part offers three additional cores and ten additional threads.

Q: How do the clock speeds compare between the two parts?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Processor U301L has a base clock of 1.20 GHz and a boost clock of 2.20 GHz. The AMD processor operates at a base clock 2.40 GHz higher and a boost clock 2.80 GHz higher.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Processor U301L has 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part provides four times the L3 capacity.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 supports LPDDR5X memory with a quad-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 273.1 GB/s. The Intel Processor U301L supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and no recorded memory bandwidth figure.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor U301L does not support ECC memory.

Q: What integrated graphics does each processor include?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 includes Radeon 8050S graphics. The Intel Processor U301L includes UHD Graphics 64EU.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 is fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Processor U301L is fabricated on a 10 nm process by Intel.

The Verdict

The recorded data contains no benchmark scores for either processor, so a performance verdict based on measurements is impossible. The specification differences, however, are extensive and clearly separate the two parts into different tiers.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 delivers 8 cores and 16 threads against the Intel Processor U301L's 5 cores and 6 threads. Clock speeds favor AMD by a wide margin: 3.60 GHz base and 5.00 GHz boost versus 1.20 GHz base and 2.20 GHz boost. The AMD part carries 32 MB of L3 cache versus 8 MB, supports quad-channel LPDDR5X memory at 273.1 GB/s, and includes ECC support. Its integrated Radeon 8050S graphics and TSMC 4 nm process further distinguish it from the Intel part's UHD Graphics 64EU and Intel 10 nm process.

The Intel Processor U301L operates at a 15 W TDP, while the AMD part has a 55 W TDP. The Intel part uses dual-channel DDR4 and DDR5 memory without ECC, has 8 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, and fits the Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP11, provides 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes, and is part of the Ryzen AI Max PRO generation based on Zen 5 architecture codenamed Gorgon Halo. The Intel part belongs to the Raptor Lake generation, codenamed Raptor Lake-PS.

For users who prioritize raw specification headroom, the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 is the only part that offers the higher core count, faster clocks, larger cache, wider memory bus, and superior graphics. For users who need a lower TDP and socket compatibility with Intel Socket 1700, the Intel Processor U301L is the only option in this pairing. The data does not support any performance recommendation, but the specification sheet fully favors AMD on every measured architectural parameter.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ on every major specification field recorded in the database.

Cores and threads: AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has 8 cores and 16 threads. Intel Processor U301L has 5 cores and 6 threads.

Clock speeds: AMD base clock is 3.60 GHz and boost clock is 5.00 GHz. Intel base clock is 1.20 GHz and boost clock is 2.20 GHz.

TDP: AMD is rated at 55 W. Intel is rated at 15 W.

Socket: AMD uses AMD Socket FP11. Intel uses Intel Socket 1700.

Process node: AMD is fabricated on TSMC 4 nm. Intel is fabricated on Intel 10 nm.

L1 cache: Both list 80 KB per core. This is identical.

L2 cache: AMD lists 1 MB per core. Intel lists 1.25 MB per core. The Intel part has 0.25 MB more L2 per core.

L3 cache: AMD has 32 MB shared. Intel has 8 MB shared.

Memory support: AMD supports LPDDR5X. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Memory bus: AMD is quad-channel. Intel is dual-channel.

Memory bandwidth: AMD has 273.1 GB/s. Intel has no recorded bandwidth figure.

ECC memory: AMD supports ECC. Intel does not.

PCIe lanes: AMD provides Gen 4, 16 lanes (CPU only). Intel provides Gen 4, 8 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics: AMD includes Radeon 8050S. Intel includes UHD Graphics 64EU.

Codename and generation: AMD is codenamed Gorgon Halo, generation Ryzen AI Max PRO (Zen 5). Intel is codenamed Raptor Lake-PS, generation Intel Processor (Raptor Lake).

Manufacturer and foundry: AMD is manufactured by AMD and fabricated by TSMC. Intel is manufactured by Intel and fabricated by Intel.

Release date: AMD released on 2026-05-19. Intel released on 2024-04-07.

Launch MSRP: Intel has a launch MSRP of $107. AMD has no recorded launch MSRP.

Multiplier unlocked: Both are locked. The multiplier is not unlocked for either part.

Die size: AMD has a die size of 70.6 mm². Intel has no recorded die size.

Part number: AMD part number is 100-000002144. Intel part number is SRPKFQ5CW.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Gorgon Halo codename, part of the Ryzen AI Max PRO generation. The Intel Processor U301L uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-PS codename, part of the Intel Processor generation.

The process technology separates the two clearly. AMD relies on TSMC's 4 nm node, while Intel uses its own 10 nm node. This process difference correlates with the TDP gap: 55 W for AMD versus 15 W for Intel. The higher TDP on the AMD part supports the higher core count, higher clock speeds, and larger cache allocation.

Cache architecture differs in structure. Both parts list 80 KB of L1 per core. AMD provides 1 MB of L2 per core, while Intel provides 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache is shared on both, but AMD allocates 32 MB versus Intel's 8 MB. This four-to-one ratio in shared cache indicates a substantially larger last-level cache footprint for the AMD design.

Memory architecture is another major split. AMD uses LPDDR5X exclusively with a quad-channel interface and a recorded bandwidth of 273.1 GB/s. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 through a dual-channel interface, with no bandwidth figure in the database. ECC memory is available on AMD only. The memory controller design on the AMD part targets higher bandwidth and reliability, while the Intel part targets flexibility across two memory standards.

PCIe connectivity differs by lane count. AMD provides 16 Gen 4 lanes from the CPU, while Intel provides 8 Gen 4 lanes. Both use PCIe Gen 4, but the AMD part doubles the lane availability for external devices.

Integrated graphics represent another architectural divergence. AMD integrates Radeon 8050S, while Intel integrates UHD Graphics 64EU. The database does not include graphics benchmark scores, but the product naming indicates different graphics IP families.

Socket and platform support differ completely. AMD uses AMD Socket FP11, while Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. This means the two processors are not interchangeable in any system configuration.

The production status for both is listed as Active, and both are mobile market segments. The release dates differ by over two years, with Intel launching on 2024-04-07 and AMD on 2026-05-19. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $107, while the AMD part has no recorded MSRP. Both processors have locked multipliers, preventing user overclocking.

The die size is recorded only for AMD at 70.6 mm², reflecting the smaller 4 nm process. No die size is available for the Intel part. Transistor counts are not recorded for either processor.

The architecture differences align with the specification gaps: AMD's Zen 5 on 4 nm delivers more cores, higher clocks, larger caches, wider memory, and more PCIe lanes at a higher TDP. Intel's Raptor Lake on 10 nm offers lower power consumption, dual memory standard support, and a lower launch MSRP. The data provides no measured performance to weigh these architectural trade-offs.