AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 vs Intel Core i7-14700F Comparison

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark records between the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 and the Intel Core i7-14700F. The AMD processor has an empty benchmark list, an average benchmark score of 0, and a 50th percentile rank. The Intel processor carries 19 recorded benchmark results, an average score of 53620, and a 91st percentile rank. This makes the comparison asymmetric: measurable performance data exists only for the Intel side.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head results for this pair, and the win counters are 0 for both processors. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has no entries in its benchmark array, so there are no AMD scores to compare against the Intel part. The only measurable wins in this comparison come from the Intel Core i7-14700F.

The Intel benchmark set covers Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark workloads. In Cinebench R15, the Intel part scores 3540 in multi-core and 499 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 14751 in multi-core and 2082 in single-core. In Cinebench R23, it scores 35122 in multi-core and 4958 in single-core. Geekbench results are 19620 for multi-core and 2429 for single-core. Passmark results include multithread at 41317, single thread at 4257, integer math at 155808, floating point math at 107005, data compression at 505885, data encryption at 30144, extended instructions at 28564, find prime numbers at 176, physics at 2455, and random string sorting at 55918.

The largest recorded Intel score is 505885 in Passmark data compression, while the smallest is 176 in Passmark find prime numbers. Against its nearest rivals, the Intel part’s average score of 53620 sits 0.2% below the Intel Xeon 6505P, which averages 53701. It sits 0.3% above the Intel Xeon Phi 7290, which averages 53469, 0.6% above the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, which averages 53288, and 0.8% above the AMD EPYC 7313P, which averages 53206. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has no nearest-rival entries, so no equivalent delta can be calculated for it.

FAQ

Q: Does the database show any benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485?

A: No. The AMD processor has an empty benchmark array, an average benchmark score of 0, and a 50th percentile rank across all CPUs.

Q: What is the Intel Core i7-14700F’s average benchmark score?

A: The Intel part has an average benchmark score of 53620, based on 19 recorded results, and a 91st percentile rank.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14700F compare with its nearest rivals?

A: It trails the Intel Xeon 6505P by 0.2%, with scores of 53620 versus 53701. It leads the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 by 0.3%, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X by 0.6%, and the AMD EPYC 7313P by 0.8%.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Which processor includes integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 includes a Radeon 8050S. The Intel Core i7-14700F lists no integrated graphics.

Q: What memory configurations do the two processors support?

A: The AMD part supports LPDDR5X over a quad-channel bus with 273.1 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, with no bandwidth figure recorded.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent different design points. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 uses the Gorgon Halo codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Max PRO generation built on Zen 5. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC and has a die size of 70.6 mm². The Intel Core i7-14700F uses the Raptor Lake-R codename and belongs to the Core 14th Gen series built on Raptor Lake Refresh. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel and has a die size of 257 mm².

Core counts differ sharply. The AMD part has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel part has 20 cores and 28 threads. Cache organization also differs. Both list 80 KB of L1 per core, but the AMD part has 1 MB of L2 per core and 32 MB of shared L3, while the Intel part has 2 MB of L2 per core and 33 MB of shared L3.

The memory interface is another major split. AMD uses quad-channel LPDDR5X with a recorded bandwidth of 273.1 GB/s. Intel uses dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5, and no memory bandwidth figure is recorded. AMD provides a Radeon 8050S integrated GPU, while Intel provides no integrated graphics. AMD uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, while Intel uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

The platform contexts are different as well. The AMD part is a mobile processor on AMD Socket FP11 with a 55 W TDP. The Intel part is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700 with a 65 W TDP. Both support ECC memory, both have locked multipliers, and both are listed as active products.

The Verdict

Strictly from the recorded data, the Intel Core i7-14700F is the only processor with measurable performance. Its 19 benchmark scores and average of 53620 place it at the 91st percentile, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has no benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile. The Intel part also has a nearest-rival profile showing it within 0.2% of the Intel Xeon 6505P and ahead of three other processors by margins of 0.3% to 0.8%. The AMD part has no nearest-rival entries, so the database provides no measured basis for selecting it over the Intel part.

For workloads represented by the recorded Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark tests, the data favors the Intel processor. The AMD part’s architectural specifications, such as quad-channel LPDDR5X, integrated Radeon 8050S, and a 55 W TDP, are present in the database, but they are not backed by any benchmark score. The Intel Core i7-14700F has a launch MSRP of $359.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 | Intel Core i7-14700F |

|---|---|---|

| Series | Not recorded | Core 14th Gen |

| Cores | 8 | 20 |

| Threads | 16 | 28 |

| Base clock | 3.60 GHz | 2.10 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.40 GHz |

| TDP | 55 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP11 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Halo | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Max PRO (Zen 5) | Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | 70.6 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | 33 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bus | Quad-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory bandwidth | 273.1 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 8050S | N/A |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release date | 2026-05-19 | 2024-01-07 |

| Part number | 100-000002144 | SRN3Z |

Both processors share 80 KB of L1 cache per core, ECC memory support, locked multipliers, and active production status, so those fields are not listed above.