AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 vs Intel Core i5-14600T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i5-14600T is the only processor in this comparison with recorded benchmark data in the database. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has no benchmark scores listed, so all performance comparisons must be drawn from the Intel part's recorded results and its position among rival processors.

The Intel Core i5-14600T delivers a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2262 and a single-core score of 319. In Cinebench R20, it records 9427 multi-core and 1330 single-core. The R23 run shows 22447 multi-core and 3169 single-core. Geekbench results show 12840 multi-core and 2559 single-core. PassMark tests show a multi-thread score of 26409, a single-thread score of 3744, and a physics score of 1873. The data compression workload scores 301827, data encryption scores 18226, extended instructions score 16985, and prime number finding scores 121. Floating point math scores 64726, integer math scores 95112, and random string sorting scores 34310.

The Intel part holds an 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score is 32707. The nearest recorded rival is the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H with an average score of 32812, a delta of -0.3 percent, meaning the Intel part trails that chip by a small margin. The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F scores 32750, a -0.1 percent delta. The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H scores 32697, a 0 percent delta, effectively a statistical tie. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662, a 0.1 percent delta, meaning the Intel part edges it out.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has no recorded benchmarks, no average score, and no nearest rivals in the database. The head-to-head wins counter shows zero wins for either side, which reflects the absence of paired test data rather than a measure of competitive performance.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge significantly in their fundamental design approaches. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 uses 8 cores and 16 threads, built on the Zen 5 architecture with the Gorgon Halo codename. It belongs to the Ryzen AI Max PRO generation and is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The die size is 70.6 mm². The Intel Core i5-14600T uses 14 cores and 20 threads, built on Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename. It belongs to the Core 14th Gen series and the Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) generation, fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel with a die size of 257 mm².

Cache hierarchies differ in structure. Both processors provide 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but the AMD part offers 1 MB of L2 per core while the Intel part offers 2 MB per core. The AMD processor has 32 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel processor has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part therefore holds an L2 advantage per core, while the AMD part holds a larger L3 pool.

Memory support shows a clear split. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 supports LPDDR5X memory via a quad-channel bus, delivering 273.1 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The Intel Core i5-14600T supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory via a dual-channel bus, with no recorded memory bandwidth figure in the database. Both processors support ECC memory.

PCI Express connectivity differs by generation. The AMD part uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part therefore provides a newer PCIe generation.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 carries a Radeon 8050S, while the Intel Core i5-14600T carries UHD Graphics 770.

Clock speeds show the AMD part with a 3.60 GHz base clock and 5.00 GHz boost clock. The Intel part has a 1.80 GHz base clock and 5.10 GHz boost clock. The Intel part boosts slightly higher, while the AMD part runs a much higher base clock.

Power profiles differ considerably. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has a TDP of 55, while the Intel Core i5-14600T has a TDP of 35. The AMD part consumes a higher power envelope, consistent with its higher base clock.

Sockets and market segments separate the two clearly. The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP11 and targets the Mobile segment. The Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700 and targets the Desktop segment. The AMD part released on 2026-05-19, while the Intel part released on 2024-01-07. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600T has 14 cores and 20 threads. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: How does memory bandwidth compare between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 delivers 273.1 GB/s via quad-channel LPDDR5X memory. The Intel Core i5-14600T uses dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 memory, and the database records no memory bandwidth figure for it.

Q: What is the process node difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14600T is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel.

Q: Which processor supports PCIe Gen 5?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600T supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only).

Q: What are the integrated graphics solutions?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 uses Radeon 8050S. The Intel Core i5-14600T uses UHD Graphics 770.

Q: How does the Intel part rank among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600T holds an 83rd percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 32707.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 | Intel Core i5-14600T |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 14 |

| Threads | 16 | 20 |

| Base Clock | 3.60 GHz | 1.80 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.10 GHz |

| TDP | 55 | 35 |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP11 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Halo | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Max PRO (Zen 5) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 70.6 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 32 MB (shared) | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Quad-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 273.1 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 8050S | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2026-05-19 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | None recorded | $255 |

| Part Number | 100-000002144 | SRN46 |

Both processors share 80 KB of L1 cache per core, ECC memory support, active production status, and a locked multiplier.

The Verdict

The recorded data provides a complete picture for the Intel Core i5-14600T and no benchmark data for the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485. The Intel part's 83rd percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 32707 place it in the upper tier of the database, with its nearest rivals clustered within a 0.3 percent delta. The data shows the Intel part essentially tied with the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, slightly ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, and slightly behind the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 offers architectural advantages in process node, memory bandwidth, and L3 cache capacity. Its 4 nm TSMC process is two generations ahead of the Intel 10 nm node. Its quad-channel LPDDR5X memory bus delivers 273.1 GB/s, a figure the Intel part cannot match on its dual-channel DDR4/DDR5 interface. Its 32 MB L3 cache exceeds the Intel part's 24 MB. These specifications indicate a design aimed at memory-intensive and bandwidth-sensitive workloads.

The Intel Core i5-14600T counters with a higher core count, higher thread count, a slightly higher boost clock, a lower TDP, and PCIe Gen 5 support. Its 14 cores and 20 threads provide more parallel execution resources than the AMD part's 8 cores and 16 threads. The higher per-core L2 cache of 2 MB versus 1 MB benefits workloads with high per-core data locality.

The market segments differ sharply. The AMD part targets mobile platforms with a 55 TDP and a 2026 release date. The Intel part targets desktop platforms with a 35 TDP and a 2024 release date. The Intel part's launch MSRP is $255. The AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP.

The benchmark data supports the Intel part as the measured performer. Its recorded scores span Cinebench, Geekbench, and PassMark workloads, with the multi-thread PassMark score of 26409 and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22447 indicating strong parallel throughput. The single-thread scores of 3744 in PassMark and 3169 in Cinebench R23 show competitive per-core performance despite the lower base clock.

The AMD part remains an unmeasured quantity in the database. Its architectural specifications suggest it could compete strongly on bandwidth-bound tasks and efficiency per die area, but without recorded benchmarks, no performance claims can be substantiated. The database shows zero head-to-head wins for either processor, reflecting the absence of paired test data.

The data indicates that the Intel Core i5-14600T is the processor with demonstrated benchmark performance, ranking in the 83rd percentile. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 is a newer mobile part with advanced process technology and memory architecture, but its performance profile is unrecorded. The choice between them depends on whether the user requires the measured multi-thread performance of the Intel desktop part or the bandwidth-oriented mobile design of the AMD part. The data alone cannot resolve that trade-off because the AMD part has no scores to compare.