AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 vs Intel Core 7 350 Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 vs Intel Core 7 350

The database contains benchmark results for the Intel Core 7 350, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has no recorded benchmark scores. The Intel Core 7 350 achieves an average benchmark score of 17,779, placing it in the 71st percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core 5 221TE (average score 17,860, delta -0.5%), the AMD EPYC 9374F (average score 17,693, delta 0.5%), the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT (average score 17,891, delta -0.6%), and the Intel Core 5 120U (average score 17,898, delta -0.7%). These tight deltas, all within 0.7%, indicate the Core 7 350 sits in a highly competitive performance cluster. For the Ryzen AI Max PRO 485, the lack of benchmark data means no direct head-to-head comparisons can be drawn from the recorded measurements.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No head-to-head benchmark entries exist for the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 versus the Intel Core 7 350. The database lists zero benchmark results for the AMD part, and the head-to-head comparison field is empty. Consequently, there are no wins for either processor in direct competition. The Intel Core 7 350 does have a comprehensive set of recorded scores, which can be analyzed on their own. In Cinebench R15, the Intel Core 7 350 scores 1,220 in multi-core and 292 in single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 5,373 multi-core and 758 single-core. The Cinebench R23 results show 8,030 multi-core and 2,046 single-core. PassMark tests reveal a single-thread score of 4,100, a multithread score of 15,170, and integer math at 33,734. Floating point math reaches 42,809, extended instructions hit 12,045, data compression scores 143,123, and data encryption scores 10,933. The processor also records 107 in prime number finding, 1,173 in physics, and 17,238 in random string sorting. These figures show the Core 7 350 excels in memory-heavy operations like data compression, where the score of 143,123 far exceeds its integer and floating point results. The single-core performance, as reflected by the Cinebench R23 score of 2,046, is relatively modest compared to its multi-core output, suggesting the 6-core, 6-thread configuration handles parallel workloads more efficiently than single-threaded tasks. Without AMD benchmark data, the analysis cannot quantify relative wins, but the Intel part's percentile ranking at 71 indicates it outperforms the majority of CPUs in the database.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 and Intel Core 7 350 differ fundamentally in their architecture. The AMD processor uses the Gorgon Halo codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Max PRO generation built on the Zen 5 core architecture. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process by TSMC, with a die size of 70.6 mm². The Intel Core 7 350 uses the Wildcat Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation, also based on Wildcat Lake architecture. Intel fabricates this chip on a 3 nm process at its own foundry, though the die size is not recorded in the database. The core configurations differ significantly, with the AMD part offering 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel part offers 6 cores and 6 threads, meaning the Intel chip lacks simultaneous multithreading. Cache hierarchies also diverge, as the AMD processor has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor has 192 KB of L1 per core, 2.5 MB of L2 per core, and only 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD chip supports LPDDR5X memory via a quad-channel bus, delivering 273.1 GB/s of memory bandwidth, and includes ECC memory support. The Intel chip supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X but uses a single-channel memory bus, limiting bandwidth to 59.7 GB/s, and does not support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity also differs, with the AMD part providing Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, while the Intel part provides Gen 4 with only 6 CPU lanes. The integrated graphics are distinct as well, with AMD using a Radeon 8050S and Intel using Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. Process node and foundry choices reflect different manufacturing strategies: TSMC at 4 nm for AMD versus Intel at 3 nm for its own chip. These architectural differences suggest the AMD processor targets higher memory throughput and multi-threaded workloads, while the Intel processor focuses on lower power with a 15 W TDP versus AMD's 55 W TDP.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads.

Q: Which processor has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 delivers 273.1 GB/s via a quad-channel LPDDR5X bus, whereas the Intel Core 7 350 provides 59.7 GB/s through a single-channel bus supporting DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 7 350 does not.

Q: What are the cache sizes for the Intel Core 7 350?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 has 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and 6 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel Core 7 350 uses a 3 nm process from Intel.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core 7 350?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 has an average benchmark score of 17,779 and ranks in the 71st percentile of all CPUs.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 and Intel Core 7 350 differ across several key specifications. The AMD processor has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel processor has 6 cores and 6 threads. Base clocks are 3.60 GHz for AMD and 1.50 GHz for Intel, with boost clocks of 5.00 GHz and 4.80 GHz, respectively. The thermal design power is 55 W for AMD and 15 W for Intel. The AMD part uses an AMD Socket FP11, while the Intel part uses Intel BGA 1516. Process nodes differ, with AMD at 4 nm from TSMC and Intel at 3 nm from its own foundry. The AMD die size is 70.6 mm², while the Intel die size is not recorded. Cache configurations show AMD with 80 KB L1, 1 MB L2, and 32 MB L3 per core or shared, while Intel has 192 KB L1, 2.5 MB L2, and 6 MB L3. Memory support differs, with AMD using only LPDDR5X over a quad-channel bus delivering 273.1 GB/s, and Intel using DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a single-channel bus delivering 59.7 GB/s. ECC memory support is present on AMD but absent on Intel. PCIe lanes are 16 for AMD and 6 for Intel, both Gen 4. Integrated graphics are Radeon 8050S for AMD and Intel Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores for Intel. The release dates differ, with AMD launching on 2026-05-19 and Intel on 2026-04-15. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $469, while the AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded. The Intel part number is SAE3F, and the AMD part number is 100-000002144.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 350 demonstrates clear strengths in specific benchmark categories based on recorded data. Its data compression score of 143,123 stands out as the highest PassMark result, indicating strong performance in memory-intensive compression tasks. The floating point math score of 42,809 and integer math score of 33,734 show robust arithmetic processing. The multithread score of 15,170 and single-thread score of 4,100 suggest balanced performance across both parallel and sequential workloads. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 8,030 and single-core score of 2,046 confirm this balance, with the multi-core result being roughly four times the single-core result, consistent with its 6-core configuration. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485, despite having no benchmark scores, offers architectural advantages that would likely favor certain workloads. Its 8 cores and 16 threads provide double the thread count of the Intel part, which would benefit heavily parallel tasks. The quad-channel memory bus delivering 273.1 GB/s is over four times the Intel bandwidth, which would accelerate memory-bound applications such as large data processing or high-resolution graphics work. The larger 32 MB shared L3 cache versus Intel's 6 MB could reduce latency for frequently accessed data. The AMD processor also includes ECC memory support, which matters for data integrity in professional environments. The Intel part's lower 15 W TDP suggests it wins in power-constrained scenarios, while the AMD part's higher 55 W TDP indicates capacity for sustained performance in less limited thermal envelopes.

The Verdict

The benchmark data provides a clear picture for the Intel Core 7 350, with an average score of 17,779 and a 71st percentile ranking. Its nearest rivals, all within 0.7% in average score, confirm it competes effectively with a range of other processors, from the Intel Core 5 221TE to the AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT. For users prioritizing measured performance, the Intel Core 7 350 delivers verified results across Cinebench and PassMark tests, with particularly strong data compression and floating point capabilities. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485, lacking any benchmark scores, cannot be evaluated on the same empirical basis. However, its specification sheet indicates a processor designed for different priorities. The 16 threads and 273.1 GB/s memory bandwidth point toward multi-threaded and memory-intensive workloads, while the 32 MB L3 cache and ECC support suggest server-like reliability features. The Intel part, with a launch MSRP of $469, offers a known quantity with a lower TDP of 15 W, making it suitable for thin-and-light mobile devices. The AMD part, with a 55 W TDP and a 5.00 GHz boost clock, appears built for higher performance envelopes. The data suggests the Intel Core 7 350 is the safer choice for applications where benchmark-verified performance matters, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 presents a speculative but architecturally compelling option for users who value memory bandwidth and thread count. The choice hinges on whether verified scores or theoretical specifications carry more weight. The database records the Intel part as an active production processor with a release date of 2026-04-15, while the AMD part is also active with a release date of 2026-05-19, meaning both are current offerings. The Intel Core 7 350's percentile placement at 71 indicates it outperforms most CPUs, but the AMD part's lack of data leaves its standing undefined.