AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 vs Intel Core 3 201E Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 and Intel Core 3 201E occupy different corners of the processor market, one a mobile-first Zen 5 part, the other a desktop Bartlett Lake chip. The data in the database shows a clear split in capability: the AMD part uses a larger core count and faster boost clock, while the Intel part counters with a higher percentile ranking and a broader benchmark suite. The Intel Core 3 201E holds a 73rd percentile versus all CPUs, compared to the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485’s 50th percentile. Those rankings reflect the recorded measurements, not the full picture of each chip’s intended workload.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 3 201E wins decisively in every benchmark category where data exists. It records 12,613 points in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1,780 points in single-core. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has no benchmark scores in the database, so the recorded wins all belong to Intel. The Intel chip also posts 14,839 in Passmark multithread, 43,894 in integer math, and 33,260 in floating point math. For tasks like data compression and encryption, the Intel part shows 164,160 in Passmark data compression and 8,931 in data encryption. These numbers indicate a processor that handles sustained multi-threaded workloads with measurable competence.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 wins on paper specifications that matter for certain use cases. It has 8 cores and 16 threads, double the Intel part’s 4 cores and 8 threads. Its boost clock reaches 5.00 GHz, higher than the Intel’s 4.80 GHz. The AMD chip uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while Intel uses a 10 nm process from its own fabs. The AMD part’s L3 cache is 32 MB shared, versus Intel’s 12 MB shared. Memory bandwidth separates the two further: the AMD chip supports quad-channel LPDDR5X with 273.1 GB/s, while Intel supports dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 with 76.8 GB/s. For memory-intensive workloads, the AMD part’s bandwidth advantage is substantial.

The AMD chip also integrates a Radeon 8050S GPU, compared to Intel’s UHD Graphics 730. The AMD part uses an AMD Socket FP11, while Intel uses Socket 1700. The AMD chip has a 55 W TDP, the Intel part a 60 W TDP. The AMD chip is a mobile segment part, while Intel is a desktop segment part. The AMD part’s release date is later, 2026-05-19, versus Intel’s 2025-01-12. The Intel part carries a launch MSRP of $134.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports the Intel Core 3 201E for any user who relies on measured benchmark performance. It holds a 73rd percentile among all CPUs, and its average benchmark score is 19,056. The nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS at 19,047, the Intel Core i5-12400F at 19,039, the Intel Core i5-1335U at 18,982, and the AMD EPYC 7773X at 18,979. The Intel Core 3 201E leads those parts by deltas of 0% to 0.4%. That is a narrow margin, but it places the chip ahead of several established processors in aggregate performance.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 does not have benchmark scores in the database, so any verdict on its performance must rely on architectural specifications alone. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration, the 5.00 GHz boost clock, the 32 MB L3 cache, and the 273.1 GB/s memory bandwidth all indicate a processor designed for parallel throughput and high-bandwidth tasks. The 4 nm process and TSMC foundry suggest efficiency advantages. The Radeon 8050S integrated graphics provide a stronger GPU option than Intel’s UHD Graphics 730. For a mobile platform, the AMD part appears built for workloads that scale with core count and memory speed.

The Intel Core 3 201E is the safer choice based on available data. It has proven scores across Cinebench R15, R20, R23, and Passmark tests. The AMD part offers a more compelling specification sheet but lacks recorded results in this database. The Intel part also has a longer production history, with a release date in January 2025, while the AMD chip releases in May 2026. The Intel part’s 60 W TDP and desktop socket make it a straightforward drop-in for Socket 1700 systems, while the AMD part targets mobile with its FP11 socket.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database lists no head-to-head benchmark results between these two processors, so the comparison relies on the Intel Core 3 201E’s standalone scores and the AMD part’s lack of recorded measurements. The Intel chip’s Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 12,613 and single-core score of 1,780 represent its peak recorded performance. In Cinebench R20, the Intel part scores 5,297 multi-core and 747 single-core. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1,271 multi-core and 179 single-core. Those numbers show consistent scaling across Cinebench versions.

Passmark results for the Intel part cover a wider range of workloads. The multithread score of 14,839 and single-thread score of 3,482 show a balanced profile. Integer math at 43,894 and floating point math at 33,260 indicate strong arithmetic throughput. Data compression at 164,160 and data encryption at 8,931 highlight specific strengths. Extended instructions score 11,035, and physics scores 1,141. Random string sorting scores 17,783, and finding prime numbers scores 57. The average benchmark score for the Intel part is 19,056, with a percentile of 73.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has no benchmark entries in the database, so its wins are architectural only. The 8-core, 16-thread count versus 4 cores and 8 threads gives it a theoretical multi-thread advantage. The 5.00 GHz boost versus 4.80 GHz gives it a clock advantage. The 32 MB L3 cache versus 12 MB gives it a cache advantage. The 273.1 GB/s memory bandwidth versus 76.8 GB/s gives it a memory advantage. The Radeon 8050S versus UHD Graphics 730 gives it a graphics advantage. Each of these specifications points to superior raw capability, but none carries a recorded benchmark score.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core 3 201E has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 boosts to 5.00 GHz. The Intel Core 3 201E boosts to 4.80 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a higher benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core 3 201E ranks in the 73rd percentile versus all CPUs. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 supports quad-channel LPDDR5X with 273.1 GB/s. The Intel Core 3 201E supports dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5 with 76.8 GB/s.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 has 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core 3 201E has 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What are the integrated graphics on each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 uses a Radeon 8050S. The Intel Core 3 201E uses UHD Graphics 730.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 485 uses the Gorgon Halo codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Max PRO (Zen 5) generation. The Intel Core 3 201E uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 3 (Bartlett Lake) generation. The AMD part is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel part uses a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD die size is 70.6 mm², while the Intel die size is 163 mm². The AMD part has an L1 cache of 80 KB per core, the Intel part also has 80 KB per core. The AMD L2 cache is 1 MB per core, while the Intel L2 cache is 1.25 MB per core. The AMD L3 cache is 32 MB shared, the Intel L3 cache is 12 MB shared.

The AMD part supports LPDDR5X memory with a quad-channel bus. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus. The AMD memory bandwidth is 273.1 GB/s, the Intel bandwidth is 76.8 GB/s. Both support ECC memory. The AMD part uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD part uses AMD Socket FP11, the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part is a mobile segment processor, the Intel part is a desktop segment processor. Both have locked multipliers.

The AMD part has a 55 W TDP, the Intel part has a 60 W TDP. The AMD part releases on 2026-05-19, the Intel part on 2025-01-12. The AMD part number is 100-000002144, the Intel part number is SRVTR. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $134. The AMD part has no launch MSRP in the database. The AMD part uses a Radeon 8050S integrated GPU, the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 730. The AMD part’s production status is Active, as is the Intel part’s. The AMD part has a 50th percentile placement, the Intel part a 73rd. The average benchmark score for the Intel part is 19,056; the AMD part has an average score of 0 in the database. The nearest rivals for the Intel part are the AMD Ryzen 5 7535HS, Intel Core i5-12400F, Intel Core i5-1335U, and AMD EPYC 7773X, with delta percentages from 0% to 0.4%.