AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 vs Intel Core 3 305 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data presents a strikingly one-sided comparison. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 wins all 15 head-to-head tests recorded in the database, with margins that range from narrow to overwhelming.

The closest contest is in single-threaded performance. In PassMark single-thread testing, the AMD part scores 4078 against the Intel Core 3 305's 3977, a lead of just 2.5%. Cinebench R23 single-core shows a similar pattern, with the AMD chip at 2012.5 versus 1852 for Intel, an 8.7% advantage. These results indicate that while the Intel Core 3 305 holds its own in lightly threaded workloads, the Zen 5 architecture still delivers superior per-core throughput.

The gap widens dramatically when all cores are engaged. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 scores 35061, which is 167.2% higher than the Intel Core 3 305's 13123. The older Cinebench R15 multi-core test shows an even larger disparity: AMD scores 5247 versus Intel's 1322, a 296.9% difference.

PassMark's integer math test delivers the single biggest margin in the entire comparison. The AMD processor achieves 190720, while the Intel chip manages only 32295, meaning the AMD part is 490.6% ahead. This result highlights the massive thread-count and core-count advantage of the AMD design in pure arithmetic throughput.

Data compression follows a similar trajectory, with AMD scoring 639356 versus 146857 for Intel, a 335.4% lead. Extended instructions show AMD at 52067 against Intel's 13543, a 284.5% gap. Random string sorting favors AMD by 298.1%, with scores of 70150 and 17623 respectively.

Other PassMark workloads reinforce the pattern. Floating-point math shows AMD at 120533 versus 42284, a 185.1% advantage. Data encryption results show AMD at 32840, which is 198% ahead of Intel's 11019. The find prime numbers test gives AMD 284 versus 115, a 147% lead. Physics simulation scores 3189 for AMD and 1233 for Intel, a 158.6% difference.

The PassMark multithread score, which aggregates many threaded operations, shows AMD at 51502 against Intel's 15439, a 233.6% lead. This comprehensive metric confirms that the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 operates in a different performance class entirely.

The average benchmark score for the AMD part is 80762, placing it at the 95th percentile of all CPUs in the database. The Intel Core 3 305 averages 18302, landing at the 72nd percentile. These percentile positions contextualize the head-to-head results: the AMD chip competes with workstation-class Xeon processors, while the Intel part sits near budget and mainstream mobile offerings.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two processors is substantial and explains the benchmark outcomes. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 uses the Zen 5 architecture on TSMC's 4 nm process node, with the codename Strix Halo. The Intel Core 3 305, codenamed Wildcat Lake, uses Intel's own 3 nm process node. Both are mobile-segment parts, but their design philosophies diverge sharply.

Core configuration tells most of the story. The AMD processor provides 16 cores and 32 threads, enabling simultaneous multithreading on every core. The Intel Core 3 305 offers 6 cores and 6 threads, with no hyperthreading support. This 10-core and 26-thread deficit fundamentally limits the Intel part in parallel workloads.

Clock speeds favor AMD as well. The Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and boosts to 5.10 GHz. The Intel Core 3 305 starts at 1.50 GHz and boosts to 4.30 GHz. While boost clocks are closer, the base clock difference of 1.5 GHz indicates the AMD part sustains higher frequencies under load.

Cache hierarchies differ in both capacity and organization. AMD's L1 cache is 80 KB per core, with 1 MB of L2 per core and a 64 MB shared L3 cache. Intel's L1 is listed as 192 KB, L2 as 2.5 MB, and L3 as 6 MB shared. The AMD L3 cache is more than ten times larger, which helps keep frequently accessed data closer to the cores.

Memory subsystems are another major differentiator. The AMD processor supports LPDDR5X over a quad-channel memory bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part also supports LPDDR5X and DDR5, but uses a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth. That is a 196.3 GB/s gap in memory throughput, which directly impacts multi-core workloads that saturate memory bandwidth.

ECC memory support also separates the two. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 supports ECC memory, while the Intel Core 3 305 does not. This makes the AMD part more suitable for error-sensitive compute tasks.

PCIe connectivity differs as well. The AMD chip provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the Intel chip offers Gen 4 with 6 lanes. Both are CPU-only lane counts. The AMD platform can support more expansion devices or higher-bandwidth storage configurations.

Integrated graphics take different approaches. The AMD processor includes the Radeon 8060S, while the Intel part has Intel Xe3 Graphics with 1 Xe core. The database does not include GPU benchmark scores, so a performance comparison cannot be made from recorded data.

Power envelopes are distinctly different. The AMD part has a TDP of 55 watts, while the Intel Core 3 305 draws only 15 watts. This 40-watt difference reflects the AMD chip's higher core count and memory bandwidth ambitions, but also means it requires more robust cooling and power delivery.

Socket and packaging hardware differs completely. AMD uses Socket FP11, while Intel uses BGA 1516. Neither is user-upgradable in a traditional sense, but the socket types indicate entirely different motherboard designs.

Release dates are separated by over a year. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 launched on January 5, 2025, while the Intel Core 3 305 arrived on April 15, 2026. Both parts remain in active production.

The Verdict

The recorded data makes the performance hierarchy unambiguous. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 wins every single benchmark in the comparison, and most wins are by enormous margins. The smallest advantage, 2.5% in PassMark single-thread, still favors AMD. The largest, 490.6% in integer math, is a generational gap.

The Intel Core 3 305's nearest rivals in the database are the Intel Core i3-14100, Intel Core 5 330, Intel Core 7 360, and AMD Ryzen 5 2600E, with average scores within 0.4% of its 18302. This places the Intel part firmly in the entry-level mobile segment. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395, by contrast, sits alongside Intel Xeon 638, Xeon w5-2565X, AMD Ryzen 9 8940HX, and Xeon w5-3535X, all within 0.4% of its 80762 average. These are workstation and high-end mobile processors.

The verdict from the data is clear: the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 is a high-performance mobile processor designed for heavy multi-threaded workloads, while the Intel Core 3 305 is a low-power entry-level chip. The 55-watt TDP of the AMD part enables its 16-core design and 256 GB/s memory bandwidth. The 15-watt TDP of the Intel part prioritizes efficiency and battery life over throughput.

For single-threaded tasks, the AMD advantage is modest but consistent. For any workload that scales across cores, the AMD processor is multiple times faster. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35061 versus 13123 means the AMD chip completes rendering tasks roughly 2.7 times faster. The PassMark multithread score of 51502 versus 15439 indicates a similar ratio.

The database does not list a launch MSRP for the AMD part. The Intel Core 3 305 has a launch MSRP of $309. The absence of pricing data for AMD prevents any cost comparison, but the performance differential is so large that the two chips clearly target different market tiers.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 has 16 cores and 32 threads. The Intel Core 3 305 has 6 cores and 6 threads. AMD leads by 10 cores and 26 threads.

Q: How large is the single-threaded performance gap?

A: The AMD processor leads by 2.5% in PassMark single-thread (4078 versus 3977) and by 8.7% in Cinebench R23 single-core (2012.5 versus 1852). These are the smallest margins in the comparison.

Q: What is the biggest benchmark margin between the two?

A: The PassMark integer math test shows the largest gap. AMD scores 190720, which is 490.6% higher than Intel's 32295.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 3 305 does not.

Q: What memory bandwidth does each processor provide?

A: The AMD processor delivers 256.0 GB/s over a quad-channel LPDDR5X bus. The Intel processor provides 59.7 GB/s over a single-channel bus supporting DDR5 and LPDDR5X.

Q: How do their power requirements differ?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 has a TDP of 55 watts. The Intel Core 3 305 has a TDP of 15 watts. The AMD part requires substantially more power and cooling.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 wins in every recorded benchmark category. Its advantages are most pronounced in multi-threaded workloads: integer math (490.6% lead), data compression (335.4%), random string sorting (298.1%), and extended instructions (284.5%). These results indicate superiority in video rendering, scientific computing, data analysis, code compilation, and any task that can utilize 16 cores and 32 threads.

The AMD part also excels in memory-intensive operations due to its 256.0 GB/s quad-channel memory bandwidth. The 64 MB shared L3 cache further reduces memory latency for working sets that fit within it. The ECC memory support adds reliability for long-running compute jobs.

The Intel Core 3 305 has no benchmark wins, but its profile suggests specific use cases. Its 15-watt TDP makes it suitable for fanless or passively cooled designs, ultra-portable laptops, and devices where battery life is a priority. The single-channel memory bus reduces power consumption and board complexity. The 6-core, 6-thread configuration is sufficient for basic productivity, web browsing, and light content consumption.

In single-threaded tasks, the Intel part is not far behind. The 2.5% PassMark single-thread deficit and 8.7% Cinebench R23 single-core deficit mean day-to-day application responsiveness would feel similar. For users who rarely push multi-core utilization, the Intel Core 3 305 could deliver adequate performance at a fraction of the power draw.

The Intel Xe3 Graphics with 1 Xe core handles integrated display output and basic GPU acceleration. The AMD Radeon 8060S is a more substantial integrated GPU, but no benchmark scores exist in the database to quantify the difference.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Max+ PRO 395 | Intel Core 3 305 |

|---------------|---------------------------|-------------------|

| Cores | 16 | 6 |

| Threads | 32 | 6 |

| Base Clock | 3.00 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.10 GHz | 4.30 GHz |

| TDP | 55 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP11 | Intel BGA 1516 |

| Codename | Strix Halo | Wildcat Lake |

| Process Node | 4 nm (TSMC) | 3 nm (Intel) |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2.5 MB |

| L3 Cache | 64 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | LPDDR5X | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus | Quad-channel | Single-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 59.7 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes | Gen 4, 6 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 8060S | Intel Xe3 Graphics (1 Xe) |

| Release Date | 2025-01-05 | 2026-04-15 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $309 |

The process node difference is notable: Intel uses a 3 nm process while AMD uses TSMC's 4 nm node. The Intel process is technically more advanced, yet the AMD chip achieves far higher performance. This reflects the different design goals. Intel optimized for low power at 15 watts, while AMD allocated up to 55 watts to feed 16 Zen 5 cores.

The cache layout shows AMD's per-core L1 and L2 design versus Intel's lumped totals. AMD's 64 MB L3 dwarfs Intel's 6 MB, a 58 MB difference that matters for data-heavy workloads. The memory bandwidth gap of 196.3 GB/s is even more decisive for multi-threaded performance.

Both processors have locked multipliers, meaning no user overclocking. Both are mobile parts in active production. The AMD part number is 100-000001243, while the Intel part number is SAE3L. Neither processor lists a series designation in the database.