AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 vs Intel Core i7-13700KF Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 and the Intel Core i7-13700KF represent two very different approaches to computing. One is a mobile-first, power-efficient processor built on a modern 4 nm process, while the other is a desktop flagship from Intel's 13th generation, designed for maximum multi-threaded throughput. The benchmark data in the database shows a decisive performance gap, but the context of each chip's intended environment is crucial for interpretation.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results are unambiguous. Across all eleven recorded PassMark comparisons, the Intel Core i7-13700KF takes the win. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 wins zero tests. The size of the margin varies significantly by workload, but the trend is consistent.

The largest deficit for the AMD chip appears in the prime number search test. Here, the Intel processor scores 186 against AMD's 75, a difference of 59.7 percent. This is a pure computational race that heavily favors the Intel part's 16 cores and 24 threads compared to the AMD's 6 cores and 12 threads. The physics simulation test is nearly as lopsided. Intel scores 2650 while AMD manages 1120, a 57.7 percent advantage for the Intel chip. This workload scales well with core count and raw frequency, both of which favor the desktop part.

Data encryption is another significant win for Intel. The Intel Core i7-13700KF posts 33314, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 reaches only 14502. That is a 56.5 percent gap. Floating point math tells a similar story. Intel's score of 114997 is 53.8 percent higher than AMD's 53084. The extended instructions test, which often reflects modern SIMD and cryptographic workloads, shows Intel ahead by 33.7 percent, with scores of 36700 versus 24333.

The margin narrows somewhat in integer math. Intel leads with 154507 against 79789, a 48.4 percent advantage. Data compression, a test that benefits from both high core counts and capable memory subsystems, shows Intel at 596493 versus 293595, a 50.8 percent gap. Random string sorting follows the same pattern, with Intel at 62726 and AMD at 31153, a 50.3 percent difference.

The overall multithreaded PassMark score reflects these individual results. Intel scores 45817, while AMD records 24244, a 47.1 percent difference. This is the headline number for most users evaluating heavy workloads.

The single-thread results are the only area where the AMD chip comes close. Intel scores 4336 while AMD scores 3995. The delta is just 7.9 percent. This suggests that AMD's Zen 5 architecture, despite having far fewer cores, is competitive on a per-thread basis. The boost clock difference is small on paper, but the IPC improvements in Zen 5 appear to narrow the gap. Still, even here, Intel holds the lead.

Looking at the broader database context, the Intel part sits at the 89th percentile among all CPUs, while the AMD chip sits at the 90th percentile. Their average benchmark scores are also close overall: 47330 for Intel and 48171 for AMD. This seems contradictory given the head-to-head sweep, but it reflects the different benchmark suites recorded for each processor. The Intel chip has extensive Cinebench and Geekbench entries in the database, while the AMD chip only lists PassMark tests. The percentile ranking places the AMD part slightly higher overall, despite losing every direct comparison.

The nearest rivals for each chip further illustrate their positioning. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 sits within 0.5 percent of the AMD Ryzen 9 3900 and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D. The Intel Core i7-13700KF trades places with the Intel Core Ultra X9 378H and the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945, with deltas of 0.3 to 0.4 percent. These figures show that each processor is competitive within its own ecosystem tier, but the direct comparison between these two specific parts is one-sided.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher single-thread score?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700KF records a PassMark single-thread score of 4336, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 scores 3995. Intel leads by 7.9 percent in this test.

Q: What is the multithreaded performance difference?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700KF scores 45817 in the PassMark multithread test, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 scores 24244. That gives Intel a 47.1 percent advantage.

Q: Does the AMD chip win any benchmark comparisons?

A: No. Across the eleven recorded head-to-head PassMark tests, the Intel Core i7-13700KF wins all of them. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 records zero wins.

Q: How do their overall database percentiles compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 sits at the 90th percentile among all CPUs, while the Intel Core i7-13700KF sits at the 89th percentile. The AMD chip has a slightly higher average benchmark score of 48171 versus 47330 for Intel.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core i7-13700KF has 16 cores and 24 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference?

A: The Intel Core i7-13700KF boosts to 5.40 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 boosts to 4.90 GHz. The base clocks are 3.40 GHz for Intel and 3.60 GHz for AMD.

The Verdict

The data directs different users to different processors. Anyone prioritizing raw multi-threaded performance should choose the Intel Core i7-13700KF. Its 47.1 percent lead in the multithread PassMark score and its 59.7 percent advantage in prime number search represent the kind of margin that matters for rendering, compilation, and heavy simulation work. The Intel chip also leads in every single recorded test, including single-thread, although that gap is much smaller at 7.9 percent.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is not a competitive alternative in direct performance terms. The database shows it trailing by roughly half in most compute-heavy workloads. However, its positioning is different. It is a mobile processor with a 55 watt TDP, integrated Radeon 8040S graphics, and LPDDR5X memory support. The Intel part is a desktop processor with a 125 watt TDP and no integrated graphics. For a system builder focused on a compact, power-limited mobile platform, the AMD chip is the only one of the two that fits that physical and thermal envelope.

The choice comes down to the use case. For a desktop workstation where power draw is not a constraint and performance is the sole metric, the Intel Core i7-13700KF is the clear pick. For a mobile or space-constrained system where the processor must include graphics and operate within a 55 watt limit, the AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is the relevant option. The benchmark results do not favor AMD in any direct comparison, but the recorded data also shows that the AMD chip holds the 90th percentile overall ranking, indicating it performs well against the broader CPU landscape rather than against this specific desktop rival.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every fundamental specification. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 uses 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core i7-13700KF uses 16 cores and 24 threads. Base clocks are close, 3.60 GHz for AMD and 3.40 GHz for Intel, but the boost clocks diverge: 4.90 GHz for AMD and 5.40 GHz for Intel.

Power draw is a major differentiator. The AMD chip has a TDP of 55 watts, while the Intel chip has a TDP of 125 watts. This reflects their different market segments, mobile versus desktop. The sockets are incompatible: AMD uses Socket FP11, while Intel uses Socket 1700.

Memory support also differs. The AMD part supports LPDDR5X with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 128.0 GB/s. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, but the database does not list a bandwidth figure for it. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity is different. The AMD chip provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the Intel chip provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes. The AMD processor includes integrated Radeon 8040S graphics. The Intel processor has no integrated graphics.

The cache layout differs as well. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 per core for AMD versus 2 MB per core for Intel. The L3 cache is 16 MB shared on the AMD chip and 30 MB shared on the Intel chip.

The Intel part is multiplier unlocked, allowing overclocking. The AMD part is locked. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $384. The AMD chip has no listed launch MSRP. The Intel part was released in September 2022, while the AMD part was released in January 2025. The Intel chip has a die size of 257 mm², while the AMD chip has no recorded die size. The Intel part number is SRMB9, and the AMD part number is 100-000001425.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide is substantial. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is built on Zen 5 architecture with the codename Strix Halo. It uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Core i7-13700KF is built on Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-S. It uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

The generation labels reflect this gap. AMD lists its generation as "Ryzen AI Max PRO (Zen 5)", while Intel lists "Core i7 (Raptor Lake)". The process node difference is significant: 4 nm versus 10 nm. This explains how AMD can deliver a competitive single-thread score of 3995 against Intel's 4336 while consuming 55 watts compared to Intel's 125 watts.

The core design philosophies differ. The AMD chip uses a unified 6-core Zen 5 configuration, while the Intel chip uses a 16-core Raptor Lake design that relies on a hybrid architecture of performance and efficiency cores. The database does not break out the hybrid core counts, but the total is 16 cores and 24 threads.

Cache architecture also separates the two. Both use 80 KB of L1 per core, but Intel doubles the L2 allocation to 2 MB per core. The shared L3 is 30 MB on Intel versus 16 MB on AMD. This larger cache pool, combined with the higher core count, contributes to Intel's dominance in data compression and encryption tests.

The memory architecture reflects the mobile versus desktop split. AMD uses LPDDR5X, a low-power memory standard, and records 128.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Intel supports the broader DDR4 and DDR5 standards, which offers flexibility for system builders but the database does not record a bandwidth number for it. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe generation is another differentiator. Intel provides Gen 5 with 20 lanes, while AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes. This gives the Intel platform more headroom for high-speed storage and expansion cards. AMD compensates with an integrated Radeon 8040S GPU, which is a major feature for a mobile part. The Intel chip has no integrated graphics, meaning a discrete GPU is mandatory for any visual output.

The manufacturing foundry also differs. TSMC produces the AMD chip at 4 nm, while Intel produces its own chip at 10 nm. The die size is recorded only for Intel at 257 mm². The AMD chip has no recorded die size in the database.

The production status for both is active. Both are currently in production. The AMD part is a mobile processor, while the Intel part is a desktop processor. This single distinction explains much of the specification gap. The Intel chip is designed to run at high power with a 5.40 GHz boost and a 125 watt TDP. The AMD chip is designed to operate within 55 watts while still delivering integrated graphics and competitive per-thread performance.

The benchmark data shows that the Intel Core i7-13700KF is the stronger processor in every direct comparison. The architecture differences, particularly core count, cache size, and power envelope, define the performance gap. The AMD Ryzen AI Max PRO 380 is a modern, efficient mobile chip, but it cannot match the desktop part's throughput in the recorded tests.