AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 vs Intel Core i3-14100T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive sweep: the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 wins all 11 head-to-head benchmark comparisons against the Intel Core i3-14100T. The largest margin appears in passmark_find_prime_numbers, where the AMD part scores 320 against Intel's 56, a 471.4% advantage. This test measures pure integer iteration performance, and the gap reflects the fundamental difference in core count and architecture between the two processors.

The second-largest delta is in passmark_extended_instructions, with the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 scoring 45,666 versus 10,414 for the Intel Core i3-14100T, a 338.5% lead. Extended instruction workloads, which include SIMD and specialized operations, clearly favor the Zen 5 design. The AMD processor also dominates passmark_integer_math at 152,414 against 40,292, a 278.3% difference, and passmark_random_string_sorting at 59,487 versus 15,579, a 281.8% gap.

Memory-sensitive workloads show a similar pattern. passmark_data_compression sees the AMD part score 554,760 against 152,636, a 263.5% advantage, while passmark_data_encryption shows 27,784 versus 7,881, a 252.5% lead. These results align with the memory subsystem differences detailed later in this analysis.

Floating-point performance follows suit. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 scores 99,548 in passmark_floating_point_math versus 31,379 for the Intel Core i3-14100T, a 217.2% margin. In passmark_physics, the AMD part reaches 2,887 against 973, a 196.7% difference. The multithread score of 45,231 versus 13,662 represents a 231.1% lead, confirming that the AMD processor scales far better with parallel workloads.

The narrowest margin is in single-thread performance. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 scores 3,927 in passmark_single_thread, while the Intel Core i3-14100T scores 3,498, a 12.3% advantage. This is the only benchmark where the two processors are remotely close, though the AMD part still wins. The Intel chip's higher boost clock cannot fully close the gap against the newer Zen 5 core design.

Looking at the broader database context, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 sits at the 96th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 90,541. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon 654 at 90,717 (0.2% behind), the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX at 91,199 (0.7% behind), the Intel Xeon w7-2575X at 88,172 (2.7% ahead of that rival), and the Intel Xeon 6736P at 87,864 (3.0% ahead). The Intel Core i3-14100T, by contrast, sits at the 71st percentile with an average score of 17,648, placing it near the Intel Core i3-13100F at 17,653 (0.0% delta), the Intel Core i7-1255U at 17,656 (0.0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE at 17,614 (0.2% ahead), and the AMD EPYC 9374F at 17,693 (0.3% behind). The average score gap between the two reviewed processors is roughly 5.1x, which is consistent with the head-to-head deltas.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Strix Halo codename, fabricated by TSMC on a 4 nm process. The Intel Core i3-14100T uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-R codename, fabricated by Intel on a 10 nm process. This process difference contributes substantially to the performance and efficiency characteristics observed in the benchmarks.

Core configurations differ sharply. The AMD processor provides 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel processor provides 4 cores and 8 threads. This 3x core and thread advantage explains much of the multithreaded performance delta. The AMD part's base clock is 3.20 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz; the Intel part runs at 2.70 GHz base and 4.40 GHz boost. Despite the Intel chip's lower clocks, the AMD chip still wins single-thread tests, indicating the Zen 5 core is more efficient per clock.

Cache hierarchies also diverge significantly. Both processors share an 80 KB L1 cache per core. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 has 1 MB L2 per core and 64 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core i3-14100T has 1.25 MB L2 per core and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD processor's 64 MB L3 is more than 5x larger than Intel's 12 MB, which benefits workloads with large working sets.

Memory support is another major differentiator. The AMD part uses LPDDR5X memory over a quad-channel bus with 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, with no bandwidth figure recorded in the database. Both processors support ECC memory. The AMD part's memory bandwidth advantage is a key factor in its data compression and encryption results.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 carries a Radeon 8060S GPU, while the Intel Core i3-14100T uses UHD Graphics 730. The AMD part is also built for the mobile segment with an AMD Socket FP11, whereas the Intel part targets desktops with Intel Socket 1700. The AMD processor's die size is listed as 2x 70.6 mm², while the Intel processor's die is 163 mm². PCIe support differs: the AMD part offers Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, while the Intel part offers Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

Release timing also separates the two. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 launched on 2026-01-05, while the Intel Core i3-14100T launched on 2024-01-07. The AMD processor is a newer design by roughly two years.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 wins every recorded benchmark category, but the magnitude of its advantage varies by workload type. The largest wins come in integer-heavy and memory-intensive tasks. Prime number finding shows a 471.4% lead, extended instructions show a 338.5% lead, and integer math shows a 278.3% lead. These results indicate the AMD part excels at computational throughput, particularly where multiple cores can be engaged simultaneously.

Data compression and encryption workloads, which depend heavily on memory bandwidth and cache capacity, also strongly favor the AMD processor. The 263.5% compression advantage and 252.5% encryption advantage align with its quad-channel LPDDR5X memory configuration and 64 MB L3 cache. Random string sorting, another memory-bound task, shows a 281.8% margin.

Floating-point workloads follow the same pattern. The 217.2% lead in floating-point math and 196.7% lead in physics indicate strong SIMD and vector processing capabilities. The multithread score of 45,231 versus 13,662 confirms that the AMD processor scales effectively across its 24 threads.

The Intel Core i3-14100T's closest relative performance is in single-thread tasks, where it trails by only 12.3%. This suggests that for lightly threaded applications, the two processors are more comparable, though the AMD part still holds the advantage. The Intel chip's modest 35 W TDP and 4-core design make it suited for basic desktop workloads where the AMD processor's full capability is unnecessary. However, based strictly on the recorded data, there is no benchmark category where the Intel part wins.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear hierarchy. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 outperforms the Intel Core i3-14100T across every measured benchmark, with margins ranging from 12.3% in single-thread performance to 471.4% in prime number finding. The AMD processor's 96th percentile ranking places it among high-end workstation and server-class parts, while the Intel chip's 71st percentile ranking puts it in the mainstream desktop range.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is the appropriate choice for workloads that demand high multithreaded throughput, large cache capacity, and substantial memory bandwidth. Its 12 cores, 24 threads, 64 MB L3 cache, and 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth make it suited for data compression, encryption, scientific computing, and other parallel tasks. The Intel Core i3-14100T, with its 4 cores, 8 threads, 12 MB L3 cache, and 35 W TDP, fits scenarios where power draw is the primary constraint and peak performance is secondary. The Intel chip's launch MSRP is $134.

For users prioritizing raw performance in the recorded benchmarks, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is the clear winner. For users constrained by platform compatibility or power limits, the Intel Core i3-14100T remains a functional option, but the performance gap is substantial in every measured category.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has the higher single-thread score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 scores 3,927 in passmark_single_thread, while the Intel Core i3-14100T scores 3,498, a 12.3% advantage for AMD.

Q: How large is the multithread performance gap?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 scores 45,231 in passmark_multithread versus 13,662 for the Intel Core i3-14100T, a 231.1% difference.

Q: What memory bandwidth does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 uses quad-channel LPDDR5X with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core i3-14100T uses dual-channel DDR4 or DDR5, with no bandwidth figure recorded in the database.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 and the Intel Core i3-14100T support ECC memory.

Q: What are the core and thread counts?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core i3-14100T has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: Which processor has the larger L3 cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 has 64 MB of shared L3 cache, while the Intel Core i3-14100T has 12 MB of shared L3 cache.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 | Intel Core i3-14100T |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 12 | 4 |

| Threads | 24 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 3.20 GHz | 2.70 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.40 GHz |

| TDP | 55 W | 35 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP11 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Strix Halo | Raptor Lake-R |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 2x 70.6 mm² | 163 mm² |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 64 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Quad-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 8060S | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2026-01-05 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $134 |