AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 vs Intel Core 3 201TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 and Intel Core 3 201TE represent two very different points in the performance spectrum, and the benchmark data reflects that clearly. The AMD part, with an average benchmark score of 90,541, sits in the 96th percentile of all CPUs tracked in the database. The Intel Core 3 201TE, by contrast, holds a 50th percentile position, and its average benchmark score is recorded as zero due to a lack of benchmark entries in the database. That absence of recorded measurements for the Intel part means the head-to-head comparison must rely on the AMD processor’s individual PassMark scores and the rival comparisons available for it.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 delivers a multithread score of 45,231 in the PassMark suite. That figure positions it firmly in high-end territory, as the database shows it trading places with workstation-class Xeon parts. The Intel Core 3 201TE has no comparable multithread measurement recorded, so the data does not permit a direct numeric comparison. However, the Intel part’s 4 cores and 8 threads, alongside its 45-watt TDP, indicate a far more modest level of parallel throughput.

Single-thread performance tells a similar story. The AMD processor records a PassMark single-thread score of 3,927, a strong result for a mobile chip with a 5.00 GHz boost clock. The Intel Core 3 201TE, with its 4.60 GHz boost clock, lacks any recorded single-thread benchmark in the database, so no exact delta can be calculated. What the data does show is that the AMD part’s single-thread score of 3,927 is itself a high-water mark, placing it above many desktop processors in the database’s distribution.

In the specific PassMark sub-tests, the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 shows its strengths clearly. It posts 152,414 in integer math, 99,548 in floating-point math, and 45,666 in extended instructions. The data compression test yields 554,760, while random string sorting reaches 59,487. The prime number search score of 320 and physics score of 2,887 round out the suite. Each of these figures stands alone in the database for this comparison, as the Intel part has no corresponding entries. The encryption score of 27,784 further underscores the AMD chip’s capability in cryptographic workloads.

When the database compares the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 to its nearest rivals, the picture becomes more nuanced. The Intel Xeon 654 averages 90,717, which is 0.2 percent higher than the AMD part’s 90,541 average, a negligible difference. The AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX averages 91,199, putting it 0.7 percent ahead. The Intel Xeon w7-2575X averages 88,172, which is 2.7 percent behind the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392. The Intel Xeon 6736P averages 87,864, trailing by 3.0 percent. These deltas place the Ryzen AI Max+ 392 in a tight cluster with high-end Xeon and Ryzen 9 processors, despite its mobile designation.

FAQ

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 compare to its closest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The AMD part scores 90,541 on average. The Intel Xeon 654 is 0.2 percent higher, the AMD Ryzen 9 9955HX is 0.7 percent higher, the Intel Xeon w7-2575X is 2.7 percent lower, and the Intel Xeon 6736P is 3.0 percent lower.

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core 3 201TE has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What are the clock speeds for both chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 has a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Core 3 201TE has a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: Both the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 and the Intel Core 3 201TE support ECC memory according to the database.

Q: What memory types do the two processors support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 supports LPDDR5X memory with a quad-channel bus and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel Core 3 201TE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus and 76.8 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What is the production status of each chip?

A: Both the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 and the Intel Core 3 201TE are listed as Active in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge sharply in architecture. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Strix Halo codename, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 3 201TE uses the Bartlett Lake codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel’s own foundry. The process node difference is substantial: 4 nm versus 10 nm, which contributes to the AMD chip’s ability to pack 12 cores into a mobile platform while the Intel part manages 4 cores in a desktop socket.

The AMD chip’s die is composed of two 70.6 mm² chiplets, whereas the Intel part uses a single 163 mm² die. Cache configurations also differ. Both processors use 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD part uses 1 MB of L2 cache per core, while the Intel part uses 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache is a decisive difference: the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 has 64 MB of shared L3, while the Intel Core 3 201TE has 12 MB of shared L3. That 64 MB pool on the AMD side is a key factor in its high benchmark scores.

Memory support is another major architectural split. The AMD processor uses LPDDR5X with a quad-channel bus and 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is typical for a high-end mobile APU. The Intel part uses DDR4 or DDR5 with a dual-channel bus and 76.8 GB/s of bandwidth. The AMD chip’s memory bandwidth is more than three times the Intel part’s, a direct consequence of the channel count and memory type. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel Core 3 201TE provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part offers a newer PCIe generation, but the AMD part counters with its integrated Radeon 8060S graphics, while the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 730. The AMD part’s integrated GPU is a substantial component for a mobile processor, whereas the Intel UHD 730 is a basic desktop graphics solution.

The sockets are entirely different: AMD Socket FP11 for the Ryzen AI Max+ 392, and Intel Socket 1700 for the Core 3 201TE. The market segments also differ: the AMD chip is designed for Mobile, while the Intel part is a Desktop processor. Release dates place the Intel chip earlier at January 2025, with the AMD part following in January 2026. Both processors are unlocked, and both are currently Active in production.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear performance hierarchy. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 sits in the 96th percentile of all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 90,541 and a multithread score of 45,231. Its nearest rivals are high-end Xeon parts and the Ryzen 9 9955HX, all within a 3 percent band. This is a processor that competes with workstation silicon despite its mobile designation. The Intel Core 3 201TE, on the other hand, holds a 50th percentile position with no recorded benchmark scores, placing it at the midpoint of the database’s distribution.

For workloads that demand parallel throughput, the AMD part’s 12 cores, 24 threads, and 64 MB of L3 cache give it a structural advantage that the Intel part cannot match on paper. The Intel chip’s 4 cores and 8 threads, with 12 MB of L3, target a fundamentally different use case. The AMD processor’s 256.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, enabled by quad-channel LPDDR5X, further widens the gap in memory-intensive tasks.

The Intel Core 3 201TE does offer a Gen 5 PCIe interface and a 45-watt TDP, which is lower than the AMD part’s 55 watts. It also supports both DDR4 and DDR5, which provides memory flexibility for desktop builds. However, the absence of benchmark data for the Intel part means the database cannot quantify its real-world performance, and its 50th percentile rank does not suggest high-end capability.

The choice depends on the workload. The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 is the pick for users who need maximum compute throughput, large cache, and high memory bandwidth in a mobile package. The Intel Core 3 201TE serves a more basic desktop role, where lower power and older memory support may be acceptable. The recorded data favors the AMD part decisively, but the Intel chip occupies a distinct niche at the lower end of the performance curve.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 392 | Intel Core 3 201TE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 12 | 4 |

| Threads | 24 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 3.20 GHz | 2.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.60 GHz |

| TDP | 55 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP11 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Strix Halo | Bartlett Lake |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 2x 70.6 mm² | 163 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 64 MB (shared) | 12 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Quad-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes | Gen 5, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 8060S | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Production Status | Active | Active |

| Release Date | 2026-01-05 | 2025-01-12 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | $134 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

| Part Number | 100-000001979 | SRPKDQ5CK |