AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i vs Intel Core i7-14700F Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no overlapping benchmark records for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i and the Intel Core i7-14700F. The AMD processor has no recorded benchmark scores, while the Intel processor has a full suite of 19 measurements across Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark tests. With zero head-to-head entries, the comparison relies entirely on the Intel side's absolute scores and the architectural context provided for both parts.

The Intel Core i7-14700F delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35122 and a single-core score of 4958. In Cinebench R20, the multi-core result is 14751, with single-core at 2082. The older Cinebench R15 test shows a multi-core score of 3540 and single-core of 499. These figures place the i7-14700F at the 91st percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 53620.

The Intel processor's nearest rivals in the database are tightly clustered. The Intel Xeon 6505P posts an average score of 53701, which is 0.2 percent higher than the i7-14700F. The Intel Xeon Phi 7290 scores 53469, putting it 0.3 percent lower. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X records 53288, a 0.6 percent deficit, and the AMD EPYC 7313P scores 53206, 0.8 percent behind. This grouping indicates the i7-14700F sits within a narrow performance band at the top end of the database, with no rival in its immediate vicinity exceeding it by more than a fraction of a percent.

Passmark results for the Intel part show a multi-thread score of 41317 and a single-thread score of 4257. Integer math reaches 155808, while floating point math posts 107005. Data compression scores 505885, and data encryption records 30144. Extended instructions produce 28564, find prime numbers yields 176, and random string sorting reaches 55918. Physics testing delivers 2455.

Geekbench results for the Intel processor show a multi-core score of 19620 and a single-core score of 2429. These benchmarks collectively describe a processor that dominates the mid-range of the database and competes at the upper tier, as its 91st percentile rank confirms. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i, by contrast, has no scores recorded, placing it at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of zero. The data cannot quantify its performance relative to the Intel part, so any direct numerical comparison between the two is impossible from the current records.

FAQ

Q: Why does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i have no benchmark scores in the database?

A: The database records no benchmark entries for the AMD processor. Its percentile vs all CPUs is 50, and its average benchmark score is 0, meaning no measurements have been logged. The Intel Core i7-14700F, in contrast, has 19 recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 91st percentile.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14700F compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The i7-14700F has an average benchmark score of 53620. The Intel Xeon 6505P is 0.2 percent ahead, the Intel Xeon Phi 7290 is 0.3 percent behind, the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X is 0.6 percent behind, and the AMD EPYC 7313P is 0.8 percent behind. All four processors fall within a one percent band.

Q: What is the highest recorded score for the Intel Core i7-14700F?

A: The highest individual score is Passmark data compression at 505885. The next highest is Geekbench multi-core at 19620, followed by Cinebench R23 multi-core at 35122.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i and the Intel Core i7-14700F list ECC memory support as true in the database.

Q: What sockets do the two processors use?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel Core i7-14700F uses Intel Socket 1700.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel part also has a slightly higher base clock at 2.10 GHz compared to 2.00 GHz.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 / Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core i7-14700F uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, and belongs to the Core 14th Gen family as a Raptor Lake Refresh. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². The process node difference is substantial, with the AMD part using a more advanced lithography from a different foundry.

Cache layouts differ significantly between the two. The AMD processor has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel processor also has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but doubles the L2 to 2 MB per core and provides 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part's larger total cache reflects its higher core count and desktop positioning.

The AMD processor integrates a Radeon 880M graphics solution, while the Intel Core i7-14700F has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A. This is a meaningful architectural difference for systems that rely on the processor's built-in display output. The AMD part also uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, while the Intel part uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, giving the Intel processor a newer and faster interface for connected devices.

The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory across a dual-channel bus, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, but the database does not list a memory bandwidth figure for it. The AMD part is classified as a mobile segment processor, while the Intel part is classified as desktop. The AMD processor's production status is active, and the Intel processor's production status is also active.

The Intel processor has a release date in January 2024, while the AMD processor has a release date in March 2026. The Intel part carries a launch MSRP of $359, while the AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded. Both processors have locked multipliers, meaning neither supports unlocked overclocking. The Intel part has a known part number, SRN3Z, while the AMD part's part number is listed as unknown.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts differ sharply. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core i7-14700F has 20 cores and 28 threads. The Intel processor provides 12 additional cores and 12 additional threads.

Clock speeds differ modestly. The AMD processor has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel processor has a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The Intel part is faster in both measures.

Thermal design power differs by more than double. The AMD processor has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel processor has a TDP of 65 watts. The AMD part consumes far less power by specification, consistent with its mobile classification.

Memory support differs in scope. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5, with no bandwidth figure recorded. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

PCIe support differs by generation. The AMD processor uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes. The Intel processor uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Both provide the same lane count, but the Intel part's interface is a generation newer.

Integrated graphics differ categorically. The AMD processor includes Radeon 880M. The Intel processor has no integrated graphics. The AMD processor also has its market segment listed as mobile, while the Intel processor is listed as desktop.

Cache specifications differ in L2 and L3. Both have 80 KB of L1 per core, but the AMD processor has 1 MB of L2 per core and 8 MB of L3, while the Intel processor has 2 MB of L2 per core and 33 MB of shared L3.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14700F wins on every measurable benchmark criterion in the database, because it is the only one of the two with recorded scores. Its 20 cores and 28 threads give it a structural advantage in multi-threaded workloads, as reflected in the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35122 and the Passmark multi-thread score of 41317. Its 5.40 GHz boost clock and 33 MB of shared L3 cache support strong single-thread performance, evidenced by the Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4958 and the Geekbench single-core score of 2429. The data shows the Intel part excels in both throughput-heavy and latency-sensitive tasks.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i wins on power efficiency by specification. Its 28 watt TDP is less than half of the Intel part's 65 watt TDP. For systems where thermal envelope and energy draw are primary constraints, the AMD processor's specification is favorable. Its integrated Radeon 880M graphics provide a display output solution that the Intel part entirely lacks, so the AMD processor wins in scenarios requiring a processor with built-in graphics capability.

The AMD processor also wins on memory bandwidth per the recorded data, with 89.6 GB/s listed, while the Intel processor has no bandwidth figure in the database. The AMD part's support for LPDDR5X memory adds a low-power memory option that the Intel part does not offer. Its 4 nm process node at TSMC indicates a more modern fabrication approach, while the Intel part uses a 10 nm process at Intel.

The Intel processor wins on platform connectivity with PCIe Gen 5 support, while the AMD part uses PCIe Gen 4. The Intel processor also wins on cache capacity, with 33 MB of shared L3 versus 8 MB, and on L2 capacity per core, with 2 MB versus 1 MB. The Intel processor's higher base and boost clocks give it a clock-speed advantage across all workloads.

The Verdict

The database records no benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i, so the Intel Core i7-14700F is the only one of the two with measurable performance data. The Intel processor's 91st percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 53620 place it among the top CPUs in the database, with nearest rivals all within one percent of its score. Its 20 cores, 28 threads, 5.40 GHz boost clock, and 33 MB of L3 cache provide a comprehensive performance profile.

The AMD processor, with its 8 cores, 16 threads, 5.00 GHz boost clock, and 8 MB of L3 cache, cannot be compared numerically because no measurements exist. Its 50th percentile ranking and zero average benchmark score reflect the absence of data, not a performance verdict. What the specifications do show is a processor designed for a different role: a 28 watt TDP, mobile segment classification, integrated Radeon 880M graphics, and LPDDR5X memory support point to embedded and low-power systems.

For users selecting between these two based on recorded data, the Intel Core i7-14700F is the only choice with demonstrated performance. Its benchmark suite covers rendering, general computation, and specialized instruction workloads, all with strong results. For users constrained by power draw and requiring integrated graphics, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i presents a compelling specification sheet, but the database offers no measured confirmation of its capabilities. The launch MSRP of $359 for the Intel part provides a reference point, while the AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded. The decision rests on whether the workload demands the Intel part's proven throughput or the AMD part's efficiency-oriented design, with the caveat that only one of the two has data to support it.