AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i vs Intel Core i7-14650HX Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i and the Intel Core i7-14650HX. The AMD processor lists zero benchmark entries, while the Intel processor has an extensive set of recorded scores across Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark workloads. This absence of data for the AMD side means no direct numerical comparison can be drawn from the measurements.

The Intel Core i7-14650HX delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20454 and a single-core score of 1969. In Cinebench R20, it records 11946 multi-core and 1686 single-core. The older R15 test shows 3470.5 multi-core and 285.5 single-core. Geekbench results place it at 14249 multi-core and 2173 single-core.

Passmark workloads reveal the Intel chip's character. Integer math scores 116661, floating point math hits 84999, and extended instructions reach 24150. Data compression records 398418, data encryption scores 22917, and random string sorting achieves 43035. Prime number finding produces a score of 152, physics reaches 2202, and multithread performance scores 33495. Single-thread performance records 3841.

The Intel part holds an average benchmark score of 41576, placing it in the 88th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 7 265H at 41621, which is 0.1% behind, the Intel Core 7 251TE at 41650, 0.2% behind, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X at 41376, 0.5% ahead, and the Intel Core i7-12850HX at 41779, 0.5% behind.

Since the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has no benchmark scores and no nearest rivals listed, the only comparative statements the database supports are about the Intel chip's position relative to its own rival group. The Intel Core i7-14650HX sits within a tight cluster where the largest gap among these four rivals is 0.5%, indicating that its performance is closely matched with those alternative processors.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists zero benchmark entries for the AMD processor, while the Intel Core i7-14650HX has 19 recorded scores across Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark tests.

Q: What is the Intel Core i7-14650HX's most notable multi-core result?

A: Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 20454, and Geekbench multi-core is 14249. The Passmark multithread score is 33495, with integer math at 116661 and floating point math at 84999.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14650HX compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 265H scores 41621, 0.1% behind. The Intel Core 7 251TE scores 41650, 0.2% behind. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X scores 41376, 0.5% ahead. The Intel Core i7-12850HX scores 41779, 0.5% behind. The Intel part's average benchmark score is 41576.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core i7-14650HX ranks in the 88th percentile. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i ranks in the 50th percentile, though this is based on no recorded benchmark scores for the AMD part.

Q: Do either processor support ECC memory?

A: Both do. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i lists ECC memory as true, and the Intel Core i7-14650HX also lists ECC memory as true.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a dual-channel memory bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel memory bus, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded in the database.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core i7-14650HX uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-HX codename, belonging to the Core 14th Gen generation as a Raptor Lake-HX Refresh. It is built on a 10 nm process by Intel, with a die size of 257 mm².

The AMD processor contains 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel processor contains 16 cores and 24 threads. Both processors use a dual-channel memory bus. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The AMD processor records a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel processor has no memory bandwidth figure in the database.

Cache configurations differ significantly. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD processor has 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel processor has 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 30 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part carries substantially more L3 cache, which typically benefits workloads with large working sets.

The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor uses Intel BGA 1964. PCIe support differs: the AMD part provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics also differ, with the AMD processor featuring Radeon 880M and the Intel processor featuring UHD Graphics 710.

Process node and foundry choices separate the two designs. AMD uses TSMC's 4 nm process, while Intel uses its own 10 nm process. The smaller process node for AMD allows for different transistor density characteristics, though the database does not list transistor counts for either part.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several recorded specification fields. Core count shows 8 cores for AMD versus 16 cores for Intel. Thread count shows 16 threads for AMD versus 24 threads for Intel. Base clock speeds are 2.00 GHz for AMD and 2.20 GHz for Intel. Boost clock speeds are 5.00 GHz for AMD and 5.20 GHz for Intel.

TDP values differ substantially: the AMD processor is rated at 28 watts, while the Intel processor is rated at 55 watts. Socket types differ: AMD Socket FP8 versus Intel BGA 1964. The multiplier is locked on the AMD part, while the Intel part has an unlocked multiplier.

Process node differs: 4 nm for AMD versus 10 nm for Intel. Foundry differs: TSMC for AMD versus Intel for Intel. Die size differs: 233 mm² for AMD versus 257 mm² for Intel. Codename differs: Gorgon Point versus Raptor Lake-HX. Generation differs: Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) versus Core i7 (Raptor Lake-HX Refresh).

L2 cache per core differs: 1 MB for AMD versus 2 MB for Intel. L3 cache differs: 8 MB for AMD versus 30 MB shared for Intel. Memory support differs: DDR5 and LPDDR5X for AMD versus DDR4 and DDR5 for Intel. Memory bandwidth is recorded only for AMD at 89.6 GB/s.

PCIe generation differs: Gen 4 for AMD versus Gen 5 for Intel. Integrated graphics differ: Radeon 880M for AMD versus UHD Graphics 710 for Intel. Release dates differ: the AMD part released on 2026-03-08, while the Intel part released on 2024-01-07. Part numbers differ: unknown for AMD versus SRMXH for Intel.

The AMD processor has no recorded benchmark scores, no average benchmark score, and no nearest rivals. The Intel processor has an average benchmark score of 41576, a percentile rank of 88, and four nearest rivals with delta percentages ranging from -0.5% to 0.5%. The AMD processor sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of 0.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports only limited conclusions because the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has no benchmark entries. The Intel Core i7-14650HX demonstrates strong measured performance across all recorded workloads, with its highest scores appearing in Cinebench R23 multi-core at 20454 and Passmark integer math at 116661. Its 88th percentile ranking among all CPUs places it well above the AMD part's 50th percentile, though that AMD percentile is based on an average score of 0.

The Intel processor's 16 cores and 24 threads, combined with 30 MB of shared L3 cache, give it a structural advantage for multi-threaded tasks. Its 5.20 GHz boost clock and unlocked multiplier provide headroom for performance tuning. The AMD processor's 28 watt TDP suggests a fundamentally different design target, one oriented toward lower power envelopes rather than peak throughput.

Users requiring measured, verified performance data should select the Intel Core i7-14650HX. The database contains no comparable evidence for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i, so any performance claim for that part remains unsupported by recorded measurements. The Intel part's nearest rivals show that it performs within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, a desktop-class processor, indicating that the mobile Intel chip holds its own against stronger desktop competition.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14650HX wins in every category where recorded data exists. Its Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3470.5, R20 multi-core of 11946, and R23 multi-core of 20454 demonstrate consistent strength across render workloads. Geekbench multi-core at 14249 confirms broad CPU throughput. Passmark results show particular strength in integer math at 116661, floating point at 84999, and data compression at 398418.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i wins in power efficiency based on the recorded TDP of 28 watts versus 55 watts for the Intel part. The AMD processor also supports LPDDR5X memory, which is not listed for the Intel part, and records a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s where the Intel part has no recorded figure. The AMD part's 4 nm process node from TSMC suggests a more advanced manufacturing technology, though the database does not list transistor counts to confirm density advantages.

For workloads that depend on large shared caches, the Intel processor's 30 MB of L3 cache exceeds the AMD processor's 8 MB by a wide margin. The Intel part also supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, which the AMD part does not, making the Intel platform potentially better suited for high-bandwidth peripheral connectivity. The AMD part supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, which remains capable but one generation behind.

The Intel processor's unlocked multiplier provides overclocking flexibility that the locked AMD multiplier does not permit. The AMD processor's lower TDP of 28 watts versus 55 watts suggests it may fit into thermally constrained designs, but the database provides no temperature or power consumption measurements beyond the TDP figures to confirm real-world behavior. The Intel part's release date of 2024-01-07 predates the AMD part's release date of 2026-03-08, meaning the AMD design is newer by roughly two years in release timing terms.