AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i vs Intel Core i5-14600T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i and the Intel Core i5-14600T. The AMD processor carries no benchmark scores in the database, while the Intel Core i5-14600T has a comprehensive set of recorded measurements across Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark tests.

For the Intel Core i5-14600T, the benchmark results indicate strong multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 22447 places it well above typical desktop processors, while the single-core score of 3169 shows capable per-thread performance. Geekbench results follow a similar pattern, with a multi-core score of 12840 and a single-core score of 2559.

Passmark data for the Intel chip shows specific strengths. The integer math score of 95112 and floating point math score of 64726 both indicate robust computational throughput. Data compression scores reach 301827, while data encryption measures 18226. The extended instructions score of 16985 and random string sorting score of 34310 round out the Passmark suite.

The Intel Core i5-14600T achieves a 83rd percentile ranking versus all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 32707. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H with an average score of 32697 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F at 32750 (-0.1% delta), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 at 32662 (0.1% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H at 32812 (-0.3% delta). These margins are extremely tight, indicating the i5-14600T sits in a crowded performance band.

Since the AMD part lacks benchmark entries, the comparison relies on architectural and specification differences rather than measured performance. The absence of AMD scores means the database cannot quantify any performance advantage for the P164i. The Intel part's recorded measurements provide the only empirical data available for analysis.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14600T compare to its nearest rivals in average benchmark score?

A: The i5-14600T averages 32707, which is nearly identical to the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H at 32697 (0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F at 32750 (-0.1% delta), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 at 32662 (0.1% delta), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H at 32812 (-0.3% delta). All four rivals are within 0.3% of the Intel part's score.

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core i5-14600T has 14 cores and 20 threads.

Q: What are the clock speeds for both processors?

A: The AMD chip has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel chip has a base clock of 1.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: What process nodes do the two processors use?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14600T uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: Both processors support ECC memory. The AMD part lists ECC memory as true, and the Intel part also lists ECC memory as true.

Q: What is the market segment for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i is classified as a Mobile processor. The Intel Core i5-14600T is classified as a Desktop processor.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i and Intel Core i5-14600T represent fundamentally different design approaches. The AMD processor uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel processor uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename, belonging to the Core 14th Gen series. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel with a die size of 257 mm².

Cache hierarchies differ substantially. Both processors have an 80 KB L1 cache per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 2 MB of L2 cache per core and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The larger L3 on the Intel chip provides more shared cache capacity for the 14-core configuration.

The AMD processor integrates a Radeon 880M graphics unit, while the Intel processor uses UHD Graphics 770. Memory support also diverges: the AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD part has a memory bandwidth rating of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part has no recorded memory bandwidth figure.

PCIe capabilities differ by generation. The AMD processor uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes for the CPU. The Intel processor uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes for the CPU. This gives the Intel part a newer PCIe standard, though the AMD part's embedded positioning may not require the additional bandwidth.

The AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part has a TDP of 28, and the Intel part has a TDP of 35. Both processors have locked multipliers, meaning they cannot be overclocked. The AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP, while the Intel part has a launch MSRP of $255.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Intel Core i5-14600T is the only processor in this comparison with recorded benchmark results. Its 83rd percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 32707 place it in the upper tier of CPUs in the database. The tight margins against its nearest rivals, all within 0.3%, confirm that this performance level is well established across multiple competing designs.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has no benchmark scores in the database, meaning its performance characteristics cannot be quantified from recorded measurements. The specifications show a lower core count (8 versus 14), fewer threads (16 versus 20), and a smaller L3 cache (8 MB versus 24 MB). However, the AMD part uses a more advanced 4 nm process compared to Intel's 10 nm process, and it has a higher base clock (2.00 GHz versus 1.80 GHz) despite a slightly lower boost clock (5.00 GHz versus 5.10 GHz).

For workloads measured by the database, the Intel Core i5-14600T has demonstrated capability across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, Geekbench, and multiple Passmark tests. The AMD processor's embedded mobile positioning and lack of recorded scores means no performance conclusions can be drawn from the data.

The Intel part's higher core count and larger cache likely contribute to its multi-threaded scores, while the AMD part's smaller footprint and lower TDP suggest a different use case. The recorded data supports the Intel part as the measured performer, while the AMD part remains an unquantified entry in the database.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several key specification fields:

• Cores: AMD has 8 cores, Intel has 14 cores.
• Threads: AMD has 16 threads, Intel has 20 threads.
• Base clock: AMD at 2.00 GHz, Intel at 1.80 GHz.
• Boost clock: AMD at 5.00 GHz, Intel at 5.10 GHz.
• TDP: AMD at 28, Intel at 35.
• Socket: AMD Socket FP8 versus Intel Socket 1700.
• Codename: Gorgon Point versus Raptor Lake-R.
• Generation: Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) versus Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh).
• Process node: 4 nm (TSMC) versus 10 nm (Intel).
• Foundry: TSMC versus Intel.
• Die size: 233 mm² versus 257 mm².
• L2 cache: 1 MB per core versus 2 MB per core.
• L3 cache: 8 MB versus 24 MB shared.
• Memory support: DDR5, LPDDR5X versus DDR4, DDR5.
• Memory bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s versus not recorded.
• PCIe: Gen 4, 16 lanes versus Gen 5, 16 lanes.
• Integrated graphics: Radeon 880M versus UHD Graphics 770.
• Market segment: Mobile versus Desktop.
• Release date: 2026-03-08 versus 2024-01-07.
• Launch MSRP: not recorded versus $255.
• Part number: unknown versus SRN46.

Where Each One Wins

From the recorded data, the Intel Core i5-14600T wins in every measurable benchmark category because the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has no benchmark entries. The Intel part shows particular strength in multi-threaded workloads, with Cinebench R23 multi-core at 22447 and Passmark multithread at 26409. Single-threaded performance is also solid, with Passmark single-thread at 3744 and Geekbench single-core at 2559.

The AMD processor's advantages lie in its physical characteristics. The 4 nm process node represents a newer manufacturing technology compared to Intel's 10 nm process. The lower TDP of 28 versus 35 suggests lower power consumption. The smaller die size of 233 mm² versus 257 mm² indicates a more compact implementation. The mobile market segment classification points toward embedded or portable applications.

The Intel processor's desktop classification and Socket 1700 compatibility align with traditional desktop builds. The support for DDR4 memory provides an upgrade path for existing systems, while DDR5 support offers newer memory technology. The PCIe Gen 5 interface provides a newer standard for connected devices.

The database records no wins for the AMD processor in head-to-head benchmarks. The Intel processor has established scores across all recorded test suites. The AMD part's specifications indicate a modern, efficient design, but without benchmark data, its performance position cannot be established. The Intel Core i5-14600T is the only processor in this comparison with empirically validated performance in the database.