AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i vs Intel Core i5-14500T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i5-14500T enters the comparison with a full set of recorded benchmark results, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has no benchmark scores listed in the database at this time. This asymmetry shapes the entire analysis: every performance figure available comes from the Intel side, and the absence of AMD results means no direct head-to-head percentage deltas can be computed.

The Intel Core i5-14500T delivers its strongest showing in Cinebench R23 multicore, scoring 11790 points. That result places it well above the single-core score of 1838 in the same test, a ratio that reflects the processor's 14 cores and 20 threads working together under full load. The Cinebench R20 run mirrors this pattern, with the multicore score of 8177 dwarfing the single-core result of 1154. In the older Cinebench R15 test, the multicore score of 2022 stands against a single-core score of 252.

Geekbench results follow a similar shape. The multicore score of 11894 compares with a single-core score of 2229, a gap that points to strong scaling across the core count. PassMark's multithread benchmark records 22910, while the single-thread score sits at 3736. The database also lists a duplicate PassMark single-thread entry with the same score of 3736, confirming consistency across that measurement.

The Intel part's average benchmark score of 28065 places it at the 80th percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals cluster tightly around that mark. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE sits at 28054 with a delta of 0 percent. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655G scores 28032, a 0.1 percent gap. The Intel Core i9-12900H reaches 28003, also 0.2 percent behind. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 scores 28128, which is 0.2 percent ahead of the i5-14500T. These deltas are small enough to place all four rivals within a narrow performance band, meaning the i5-14500T neither dominates nor trails its immediate competition by any meaningful margin in aggregate scoring.

Specialized PassMark workloads reveal where the Intel chip concentrates its throughput. The data compression test records 262417, by far the highest absolute number among its PassMark results. Integer math reaches 80922, floating point math hits 58869, and random string sorting lands at 28462. Extended instructions score 16043, data encryption scores 15410, and physics scores 1288. The find prime numbers test returns 81, a low figure that reflects the nature of that workload rather than any general weakness.

Without AMD benchmark data, no wins can be assigned to either processor. The wins count for both parts stands at zero. The database records no head-to-head benchmark entries for this pairing, so any claim of superiority in a specific workload would have no measured basis.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from opposite design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on the Zen 5 and Zen 5c core architecture. The Intel Core i5-14500T uses the Raptor Lake codename, specifically Raptor Lake-R, and belongs to the Core 14th Gen family under the Raptor Lake Refresh generation.

Manufacturing processes differ sharply. AMD builds its chip on a 4 nm process at TSMC. Intel fabricates the i5-14500T on a 10 nm process at its own foundry. The die sizes are close, with the AMD part measuring 233 mm² versus 215 mm² for Intel, but the process gap means the AMD design packs its transistors into a smaller feature size.

Core counts favor Intel on raw numbers. The i5-14500T provides 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD part offers 8 cores and 16 threads. Clock speeds tell a different story. The AMD chip has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel chip starts at 1.70 GHz and boosts to 4.80 GHz. The AMD part holds the advantage in both base and boost frequencies.

Cache hierarchies differ in structure. Both use 80 KB of L1 cache per core and 1 MB of L2 cache per core on the AMD side, but the Intel chip carries 1.25 MB of L2 per core. The L3 cache shows the largest gap: AMD provides 8 MB total, while Intel offers 24 MB shared. That extra L3 capacity gives the Intel processor more room for frequently accessed data across its larger core count.

Power envelopes move in opposite directions. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Core i5-14500T draws up to 35 watts. The AMD part targets the mobile market segment, whereas the Intel chip is a desktop part. Sockets reflect that split: AMD uses the FP8 socket, and Intel uses Socket 1700.

Memory support overlaps but does not match. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X over a dual-channel bus with a measured bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but the database lists no bandwidth figure for it. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe generations diverge significantly. AMD provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Intel provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The newer PCIe standard on the Intel side offers higher potential transfer rates for compatible devices.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD part uses the Radeon 880M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 770. No benchmark data exists in the database for either iGPU, so relative graphics performance cannot be quantified.

Release timing separates the pair by just over two years. The Intel chip entered production with a release date of 2024-01-08, while the AMD chip followed with a release date of 2026-03-09. Both remain in active production status.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T has 14 cores and 20 threads. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: How do the boost clocks compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i boosts to 5.00 GHz, which is 0.20 GHz higher than the Intel Core i5-14500T's 4.80 GHz boost. The AMD chip also starts higher, at 2.00 GHz base versus 1.70 GHz.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: Both processors support ECC memory. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: What is the Intel Core i5-14500T's average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T has an average benchmark score of 28065, placing it at the 80th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: Which processor uses a smaller manufacturing process?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i uses a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14500T uses a 10 nm process at Intel.

Q: Is there any benchmark data for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i?

A: The database lists no benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i. Its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile rank is 50.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports only a one-sided verdict. The Intel Core i5-14500T has an extensive benchmark profile, an average score of 28065, and an 80th percentile rank. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has no benchmark scores, an average score of 0, and a 50th percentile rank. In terms of measurable performance, the Intel part is the only one with evidence of capability.

The Intel chip also leads in core count, thread count, L3 cache size, and PCIe generation. It offers 14 cores versus 8, 20 threads versus 16, 24 MB of shared L3 versus 8 MB, and PCIe Gen 5 versus Gen 4. Those advantages matter for workloads that scale with parallelism and memory bandwidth.

The AMD part counters with a higher boost clock, a lower TDP, a smaller process node, and a newer release date. The 5.00 GHz boost versus 4.80 GHz gives it a single-core clock advantage on paper, and the 28 watt TDP versus 35 watts suggests greater efficiency per watt, though no power efficiency benchmarks exist in the database to confirm that. The 4 nm process versus 10 nm indicates a more modern fabrication approach.

For users interpreting the database strictly, the Intel Core i5-14500T is the only processor with demonstrated performance. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i remains an unmeasured quantity. Its architectural advantages in clock speed and process node are real but unverified in actual workloads.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every recorded specification field.

• Cores: AMD 8, Intel 14
• Threads: AMD 16, Intel 20
• Base clock: AMD 2.00 GHz, Intel 1.70 GHz
• Boost clock: AMD 5.00 GHz, Intel 4.80 GHz
• TDP: AMD 28 watts, Intel 35 watts
• Socket: AMD FP8, Intel Socket 1700
• Codename: AMD Gorgon Point, Intel Raptor Lake-R
• Generation: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c), Intel Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
• Process node: AMD 4 nm, Intel 10 nm
• Foundry: AMD TSMC, Intel Intel
• Die size: AMD 233 mm², Intel 215 mm²
• L2 cache per core: AMD 1 MB, Intel 1.25 MB
• L3 cache: AMD 8 MB, Intel 24 MB shared
• Memory support: AMD DDR5, LPDDR5X; Intel DDR4, DDR5
• Memory bandwidth: AMD 89.6 GB/s, Intel not listed
• PCIe: AMD Gen 4, 16 lanes; Intel Gen 5, 16 lanes
• Integrated graphics: AMD Radeon 880M, Intel UHD Graphics 770
• Market segment: AMD Mobile, Intel Desktop
• Release date: AMD 2026-03-09, Intel 2024-01-08
• Part number: AMD unknown, Intel SRN3P
• Launch MSRP: AMD not listed, Intel $232

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14500T wins in every measured category because it is the only processor with benchmark data. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 11790, Geekbench multicore score of 11894, and PassMark multithread score of 22910 all demonstrate strong parallel throughput. The 80th percentile ranking confirms its position above the median CPU in the database. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache and 20 threads give it a structural advantage in multi-threaded rendering, compilation, and content creation workloads.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i wins on specification-based grounds without measured confirmation. Its 5.00 GHz boost clock exceeds the Intel part by 0.20 GHz, which could translate to faster single-thread responsiveness if the architecture scales accordingly. Its 28 watt TDP sits 7 watts below the Intel chip, making it the more power-conscious option for thermally constrained systems. The 4 nm process node suggests a denser, more modern implementation. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth figure gives it a quantified memory throughput edge that the Intel part lacks in the database. The Radeon 880M integrated graphics may offer different media capabilities than the UHD Graphics 770, though no benchmarks confirm either way.

The use-case split follows the market segments. The Intel Core i5-14500T is a desktop processor with verified performance across a broad range of tests, suited to any workload where measured throughput matters. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i is a mobile processor with architectural promise but zero recorded results, suited only to scenarios where clock speed, power draw, and process technology take priority over demonstrated performance.