AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i vs Intel Core i3-14100F Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i and the Intel Core i3-14100F. The AMD processor has no recorded benchmark scores, no average benchmark score, and no nearest rivals listed. The Intel Core i3-14100F, by contrast, has a complete benchmark profile with nineteen recorded test scores and an average benchmark score of 18519.

The Intel Core i3-14100F places in the 72nd percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals, according to the recorded data, are the Intel Core i5-13420H with an average score of 18511 and a delta of 0%, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE with an average score of 18505 and a delta of 0.1%, the Intel Core i3-13100 with an average score of 18380 and a delta of 0.8%, and the Intel Core 7 360 with an average score of 18374 and a delta of 0.8%. These deltas indicate that the Core i3-14100F is effectively at parity with the Core i5-13420H, slightly ahead of the Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE, and marginally ahead of both the Core i3-13100 and Core 7 360.

Looking at the Core i3-14100F's individual test results, the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 13084 and single-core score of 1847 show a roughly 7.1 to 1 ratio between multicore and single-core throughput. The Geekbench multicore score of 7598 and single-core score of 2105 produce a ratio of approximately 3.6 to 1. The PassMark multithread score of 15420 versus the PassMark single-thread score of 3778 yields a ratio of about 4.1 to 1.

The PassMark sub-tests reveal where the Core i3-14100F concentrates its compute capabilities. Integer math scores 45357, floating-point math scores 35370, and extended instructions score 11984. Data compression scores 176106, while data encryption scores 8922. Random string sorting scores 17596, and find prime numbers scores 61. Physics scores 1077. These figures establish the Core i3-14100F as a capable desktop processor, but without any recorded benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i, no direct performance comparison can be made from the database.

Where Each One Wins

Because the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has no benchmark entries in the database, there are no measured wins for either processor in a head-to-head sense. The Intel Core i3-14100F holds every recorded benchmark score in this comparison by default, since it is the only one of the two with test data.

The Core i3-14100F's benchmark profile shows particular strength in data compression, where the PassMark score of 176106 is roughly 19.7 times its data encryption score of 8922. This suggests the processor handles compression workloads with far greater efficiency than encryption tasks. Integer math at 45357 outperforms floating-point math at 35370 by about 28%, indicating that integer-heavy workloads extract more throughput from the architecture. The extended instructions score of 11984 sits between the two math scores, reflecting moderate SIMD capability.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i's specifications suggest its intended deployment differs substantially. Its 8 cores and 16 threads, combined with a 28 watt TDP and mobile market segment, point toward power-constrained embedded applications. Its integrated Radeon 880M graphics provide a display output capability that the Core i3-14100F lacks entirely, as the Intel part has no integrated graphics. The AMD processor's memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s with DDR5 and LPDDR5X support, alongside ECC memory capability, indicates a focus on reliability and sustained throughput in embedded scenarios.

The Core i3-14100F, with its 4 cores and 8 threads, 58 watt TDP, and desktop market segment, targets conventional desktop builds. Its PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 CPU lanes offers newer interconnect bandwidth compared to the AMD part's PCIe Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes. The absence of integrated graphics on the Intel part means a discrete GPU is mandatory, whereas the AMD part can operate with its integrated Radeon 880M.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The processor employs a hybrid core arrangement combining Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, though the database does not specify how many of each type are present within the 8-core, 16-thread configuration. Its base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

The Intel Core i3-14100F belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename, and is part of the Core i3 generation described as Raptor Lake Refresh. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel, with a die size of 163 mm². The processor runs a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. It uses a conventional monolithic design without hybrid core types, as the database lists no core type differentiation for this part.

Cache configurations differ between the two processors. The AMD part provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor therefore offers 25% more L2 cache per core and 4 MB more L3 cache overall, while the AMD processor's additional cores give it a larger aggregate L2 capacity across the full chip.

Memory support diverges significantly. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory across a dual-channel bus, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory across a dual-channel bus, but the database records no memory bandwidth figure for it. Both processors support ECC memory. The AMD part's inclusion of LPDDR5X support reflects its mobile and embedded positioning, while the Intel part's DDR4 compatibility serves desktop upgraders.

PCIe capabilities differ by generation. The AMD processor provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, while the Intel processor provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The Intel part's newer PCIe standard offers greater potential interconnect bandwidth, though the database does not record realized throughput figures for either.

The AMD processor integrates Radeon 880M graphics, while the Intel processor has no integrated graphics. The AMD part's socket is AMD Socket FP8, a mobile and embedded form factor. The Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop socket. Both processors have locked multipliers, and neither offers overclocking.

The process node gap is substantial. The AMD part's 4 nm TSMC process is considerably more advanced than the Intel part's 10 nm process, which likely contributes to the AMD processor's 28 watt TDP versus the Intel processor's 58 watt TDP. The AMD part draws less than half the power of the Intel part while offering double the core and thread count. The die size difference, 233 mm² for AMD versus 163 mm² for Intel, is notable given the AMD part's smaller process node, which suggests the AMD die accommodates the integrated GPU and additional cores.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Core i3-14100F has 4 cores and 8 threads. The AMD processor offers double the core and thread count.

Q: Does either processor include integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i includes Radeon 880M integrated graphics. The Intel Core i3-14100F has no integrated graphics, meaning it requires a discrete GPU.

Q: Which processor supports faster PCIe?

A: The Intel Core i3-14100F supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory. The Intel Core i3-14100F supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. Both use dual-channel memory buses, and both support ECC memory.

Q: What is the power draw difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has a 28 watt TDP, while the Intel Core i3-14100F has a 58 watt TDP. The AMD processor consumes less than half the power of the Intel processor.

Q: What benchmark scores exist for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i3-14100F has recorded scores including Cinebench R23 multicore at 13084, Cinebench R23 single-core at 1847, Geekbench multicore at 7598, Geekbench single-core at 2105, and an average benchmark score of 18519. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i | Intel Core i3-14100F |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 4 |

| Threads | 16 | 8 |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 3.50 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.70 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 58 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i3 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | 233 mm² | 163 mm² |

| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 8 MB | 12 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 880M | N/A |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release date | 2026-03-08 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $109 |

| Part number | Unknown | SRMX2 |

| Percentile vs all CPUs | 50 | 72 |

| Average benchmark score | 0 | 18519 |

The Verdict

The database contains no benchmark measurements for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i, so any selection between these two processors must rest on specifications rather than measured performance. The Intel Core i3-14100F carries the only recorded performance data in this comparison, with an average benchmark score of 18519 and a 72nd percentile placement among all CPUs. Its nearest rivals, the Core i5-13420H at 18511 and Ryzen 3 PRO 8300GE at 18505, confirm that it sits in a well-established performance tier for its class.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i presents a fundamentally different design philosophy. Its 8 cores and 16 threads, 28 watt TDP, integrated Radeon 880M graphics, LPDDR5X memory support, and mobile socket point toward embedded and compact systems where power efficiency and integration matter more than peak benchmark scores. Its 5.00 GHz boost clock exceeds the Intel part's 4.70 GHz, and its 4 nm TSMC process gives it a significant manufacturing advantage over Intel's 10 nm node. The doubled core count and thread count suggest strong multi-threaded potential, but without recorded benchmark scores, that potential remains unverified in the database.

The Intel Core i3-14100F suits conventional desktop builds where a discrete GPU is already planned. Its 12 MB of shared L3 cache, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, DDR4 and DDR5 support, and PCIe Gen 5 connectivity provide a flexible foundation for mainstream systems. Its 58 watt TDP is more than double the AMD part's 28 watt TDP, but desktop platforms typically accommodate that power draw without difficulty. Its launch MSRP is $109, and its 72nd percentile ranking places it above the AMD part's 50th percentile standing, though that percentile figure for the AMD part exists without supporting benchmark data.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i targets scenarios requiring low power consumption, integrated graphics, ECC memory, and compact form factors. Its mobile market segment and FP8 socket limit its use to embedded platforms and specialized motherboards. The Intel Core i3-14100F targets standard desktop environments with its Socket 1700 platform and broad memory compatibility. The recorded data supports the Intel part for users who need verified performance metrics, while the AMD part remains a specification-only proposition until benchmark results populate the database.