AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i vs Intel Core 5 223PE Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i and the Intel Core 5 223PE?

A: Both processors feature 8 cores and 16 threads, making them equivalent in raw thread availability.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Core 5 223PE has a TDP of 65 watts. The AMD part is rated for a lower power envelope.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PE has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i's boost clock of 5.00 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i and the Intel Core 5 223PE support ECC memory.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core 5 223PE?

A: The Intel Core 5 223PE has an average benchmark score of 40585, and it sits at the 87th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: What is the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i's percentile ranking?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has a percentile rank of 50 among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 0 in the recorded data.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i belongs to the Gorgon Point generation, built on the Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core 5 223PE is part of the Bartlett Lake generation, built on a 10 nm process at Intel, with no die size recorded in the database.

Cache layouts differ significantly. The AMD processor allocates 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, with 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel processor also has 80 KB of L1 per core, but its L2 is 2 MB per core, and its L3 is 24 MB shared. This gives the Intel part a substantially larger total cache, which can benefit workloads that repeatedly access large data sets.

Memory support also diverges. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus and have a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is supported on both.

PCIe capabilities differ by generation. The AMD part uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), whereas the Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The newer PCIe standard on the Intel side offers higher transfer rates for compatible devices.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i includes a Radeon 880M iGPU, while the Intel Core 5 223PE uses UHD Graphics 730. The two solutions target different graphics performance levels, with the Radeon 880M generally positioned as a more capable integrated solution in the database's product hierarchy.

The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8, a mobile-oriented socket, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop socket. The market segments reflect this: the AMD part is classified as Mobile, and the Intel part is classified as Desktop. The AMD processor has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the Intel processor has a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

The production status for both is Active, and both were released on the same date: 2026-03-08.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i and the Intel Core 5 223PE. The AMD processor has no recorded benchmark scores, and its average benchmark score is 0. The Intel processor, by contrast, has a full suite of Cinebench and PassMark results.

The Intel Core 5 223PE delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 26455 and a single-core score of 3734. In Cinebench R20, it scores 11111 multi-core and 1568 single-core. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2666 multi-core and 376 single-core. These results indicate strong multi-threaded throughput for a desktop 8-core part.

PassMark results for the Intel processor cover a range of workloads. Integer math scores 99819, floating point math scores 76468, and extended instructions score 24672. Data compression scores 346623, data encryption scores 18448, and random string sorting scores 35798. Find prime numbers scores 159, physics scores 2493, and multithread scores 31124. Single-thread performance is recorded at 4219 in both PassMark fields.

The Intel Core 5 223PE sits at the 87th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 40585. Its nearest rivals in the database are the Intel Core 7 253PE with an average score of 40557 and a delta of 0.1%, the Intel Xeon 6357P with an average score of 40630 and a delta of -0.1%, the Intel Core Ultra X7 368H with an average score of 40518 and a delta of 0.2%, and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435G with an average score of 40718 and a delta of -0.3%. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, meaning the Intel Core 5 223PE trades places with a tight cluster of similarly scored processors.

Because the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has no benchmark entries, its performance cannot be quantified relative to the Intel part from the recorded data. The only ranking signal is its 50th percentile position, which places it far below the Intel Core 5 223PE's 87th percentile in the database's overall CPU distribution. However, that percentile is based on an average score of 0, so the comparison is not a direct measure of the AMD chip's capability; it reflects the absence of benchmark data.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i | Intel Core 5 223PE |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Bartlett Lake |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core 5 (Bartlett Lake) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | Not recorded |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 880M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Part Number | unknown | SA4QF |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $232 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | false | false |

The two processors share the same core count, thread count, L1 cache per core, memory bus width, memory bandwidth, ECC support, and production status. Both are locked parts. The differences are concentrated in clock speeds, power, cache, memory types, PCIe generation, graphics, socket, process node, and market segment.

The Verdict

The Intel Core 5 223PE is the only one of the two with recorded performance data. It shows strong multi-core and single-core results across Cinebench R15, R20, and R23, plus a broad set of PassMark workload scores. Its 87th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 40585 place it within a tight cluster of comparable processors, all within 0.3% of its score.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has no benchmark data in the database, so no measured performance can be attributed to it. Its 50th percentile ranking and average score of 0 reflect missing measurements rather than a validated performance level. The specification sheet shows a 28 W TDP, a 4 nm TSMC process, a 233 mm² die, 8 MB of L3 cache, and a Radeon 880M iGPU. These characteristics point to a mobile-embedded design where power efficiency and integration are priorities, but the data does not support a quantitative comparison.

For workloads where measured performance matters, the Intel Core 5 223PE is the only part with evidence of capability. It offers higher base and boost clocks, double the L2 cache per core, triple the L3 cache, PCIe Gen 5, and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. Its launch MSRP is $232, and it is a desktop processor.

The AMD part targets a different design point: a mobile-embedded socket, a lower TDP, and a smaller process node. Those are meaningful architectural distinctions, but without benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm how they translate into application performance. Users seeking a desktop processor with verified results should look to the Intel Core 5 223PE. Users prioritizing a lower power envelope and a mobile-embedded form factor may find the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i more aligned with those constraints, but its performance remains unmeasured in the current data.