AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i vs Intel Core 5 210H Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core 5 210H is the only processor in this comparison with recorded benchmark data. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has no benchmark entries in the database, so all quantitative performance comparisons must draw exclusively from the Intel part's measurements. The Core 5 210H shows a strong multi-core showing in Cinebench R23 with a score of 11830, while its single-core result in the same test reaches 1771. In Cinebench R20, the same processor delivers 6504 in multi-core and 918 in single-core. The older Cinebench R15 test records 1757 multi-core and 247 single-core for the Intel chip.

PassMark results for the Core 5 210H are extensive. The processor scores 3539 in both the PassMark single thread and singlethread tests, indicating these are the same measurement. Multi-thread performance reaches 18252. Integer math workloads produce a score of 61503, while floating point math lands at 45057. Extended instructions score 13370, data compression scores 217805, and data encryption scores 12187. The processor finds prime numbers at a rate of 53, random string sorting completes at 23451, and physics workloads score 1040.

The absence of benchmark data for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i means the database cannot compute head-to-head deltas between the two parts. The wins counter shows 0 for both processors, reflecting the lack of direct comparative measurements rather than parity in performance. The Intel Core 5 210H holds a percentile rank of 77 among all CPUs in the database, placing it above the majority of recorded processors. The AMD part sits at the 50th percentile, though this is based on its average benchmark score of 0, which again reflects missing data rather than measured performance.

The nearest rivals to the Intel Core 5 210H provide context for its positioning. The Intel Core i7-13620H records an average score of 24911, which is 0.2% lower than the Core 5 210H's average of 24872. The AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX scores 24822, putting it 0.2% ahead of the Core 5 210H. The Intel Core i7-11850H averages 24935, a 0.3% deficit relative to the Core 5 210H. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500F averages 24964, which is 0.4% lower. These narrow deltas indicate the Core 5 210H sits in a tightly contested performance band, with all four rivals within 0.4% of its average score.

Where Each One Wins

Given the available data, the Intel Core 5 210H is the only processor with measurable wins. It records positive scores across every benchmark category in the database, from Cinebench render tests to PassMark math and encryption workloads. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has no recorded wins because no benchmark results exist for it.

The Core 5 210H's strengths are most pronounced in integer math, where the score of 61503 represents a substantial portion of its overall workload capability. Floating point math at 45057 indicates solid numerical processing, while data compression at 217805 shows efficiency in memory-heavy operations. The multi-thread score of 18252 aligns with its 8-core, 12-thread configuration, and the single-thread score of 3539 reflects its 4.80 GHz boost capability.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i's architecture suggests different priorities. Its 8 cores and 16 threads indicate symmetric multi-threading, while the Intel part uses a hybrid configuration with fewer threads. The AMD processor's 4 nm process node, compared to Intel's 10 nm node, implies potential efficiency advantages in power draw, though no wattage measurements are available to confirm this. The AMD part's Radeon 880M integrated graphics likely outperforms the Intel Iris Xe Graphics 48EU in GPU-heavy tasks, though no benchmark scores exist to validate this claim.

For users selecting between these two mobile processors, the Intel Core 5 210H has the advantage of verified performance data. The AMD part's claims must remain qualitative, based on architectural features rather than measured results. The Intel processor's 77th percentile rank among all CPUs provides a concrete reference point, while the AMD part's 50th percentile is an artifact of its zero average score.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core 5 210H uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-H, and belongs to the Core 5 generation built on Raptor Lake Refresh. Intel fabricates this chip on a 10 nm process at its own foundry, and no die size is recorded.

Both processors have 8 cores, but thread counts differ. The AMD part supports 16 threads, indicating simultaneous multi-threading on all cores. The Intel part supports 12 threads, which suggests a hybrid arrangement where some cores lack hyper-threading. The AMD processor's base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel processor's base clock is 2.20 GHz with a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Cache hierarchies differ notably. Both parts have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD processor has 1 MB of L2 cache per core, while the Intel part has 2 MB per core. For L3 cache, the AMD processor has 8 MB, while the Intel part has 12 MB shared across the chip. The Intel part's larger L2 and L3 caches likely contribute to its measured performance in cache-sensitive workloads.

Memory support diverges. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with dual-channel configuration and a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration, but no bandwidth figure is recorded. The AMD part supports ECC memory, while the Intel part does not. PCIe capabilities also differ: the AMD processor uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes for the CPU, while the Intel processor uses Gen 5 with 8 lanes for the CPU.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD processor includes Radeon 880M graphics, while the Intel part includes Iris Xe Graphics 48EU. The AMD processor's socket is AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel part uses Intel BGA 1744. Both processors target the mobile market segment and are currently in active production.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several recorded specification fields. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has 16 threads, while the Intel Core 5 210H has 12 threads. Base clocks differ: 2.00 GHz for AMD versus 2.20 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks differ: 5.00 GHz for AMD versus 4.80 GHz for Intel. Thermal design power differs: 28 watts for AMD versus 45 watts for Intel. The AMD part uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel part uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Die size is recorded only for the AMD processor at 233 mm². L2 cache per core is 1 MB for AMD and 2 MB for Intel. L3 cache is 8 MB for AMD and 12 MB for Intel. Memory support includes LPDDR5X for AMD but not for Intel, and DDR4 for Intel but not for AMD. Memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is recorded only for AMD. ECC memory support is true for AMD and false for Intel. PCIe generation differs: Gen 4 for AMD versus Gen 5 for Intel. PCIe lane count differs: 16 lanes for AMD versus 8 lanes for Intel.

Integrated graphics differ: Radeon 880M for AMD versus Iris Xe Graphics 48EU for Intel. Release dates differ: the AMD processor was released in March 2026, while the Intel processor was released in December 2024. The Intel part has a recorded launch MSRP of $342, while the AMD part has no launch price recorded. The Intel part has a part number of SRQ6RQ5MN, while the AMD part's part number is unknown. Both processors have locked multipliers and are not overclockable.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has 16 threads, while the Intel Core 5 210H has 12 threads. Both have 8 cores.

Q: What is the performance ranking of the Intel Core 5 210H?

A: The Intel Core 5 210H holds a 77th percentile ranking among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 24872. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX, scores 24822, which is 0.2% higher.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i have any benchmark scores?

A: No. The database contains no benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i, so its average benchmark score is recorded as 0 and its percentile rank is 50.

Q: What are the clock speeds of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel Core 5 210H has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 5 210H does not support ECC memory.

Q: How much L3 cache does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Core 5 210H has 12 MB of shared L3 cache.