AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i vs Intel Core 5 130HL Comparison

The database records no benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i or the Intel Core 5 130HL. Both processors are listed at the 50th percentile among all CPUs, the average benchmark score for each is 0, and the recorded head-to-head win count is 0 for both. The comparison that follows therefore uses the architectural and specification fields in the database instead of measured performance samples.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark list is empty. There are no recorded multi-core, single-core, or integrated graphics benchmark scores for either part. With 0 wins recorded for each processor, the database does not show either chip outperforming the other in any benchmark category. Both sit at the 50th percentile among all CPUs, and the average benchmark score is 0 for both, which reinforces that no sample data is attached to these records.

The closest performance-related numbers are the clock rates. AMD lists a 2.00 GHz base clock and a 5.00 GHz boost clock, while Intel lists a 2.60 GHz base clock and a 4.80 GHz boost clock. AMD's boost clock is higher, and Intel's base clock is higher. Those are the only clock figures in the database, and they cannot be treated as benchmark wins.

The remaining quantitative differences are in specifications. AMD has 8 cores, 16 threads, 8 MB L3 cache, and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth. Intel has 12 cores, 16 threads, 18 MB L3 cache, and no recorded memory bandwidth. Because the benchmark fields are empty, the largest concrete differences between the two records are core count, cache capacity, TDP, PCIe lane count, and memory support.

Architecture Differences

The AMD processor's codename is Gorgon Point. Its generation is listed as Ryzen AI Embedded with Zen 5 / Zen 5c cores. The Intel processor's codename is Raptor Lake-PS, its architecture is Raptor Lake, and its generation is Core 5. AMD is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while Intel is built on a 10 nm process at Intel. AMD's die size is 233 mm²; Intel's die size is not recorded.

Core counts differ. AMD has 8 cores and 16 threads, Intel has 12 cores and 16 threads. Both parts use 80 KB L1 per core. L2 cache is 1 MB per core on AMD and 2 MB per core on Intel. L3 cache is 8 MB on AMD and 18 MB shared on Intel.

Memory support also differs. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. AMD records 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, while Intel has no recorded memory bandwidth value. AMD lists ECC memory as true, Intel lists ECC memory as false. Both use Gen 4 PCIe, but AMD provides 16 CPU lanes and Intel provides 8.

AMD uses AMD Socket FP8, Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. Integrated graphics are Radeon 880M on AMD and Iris Xe Graphics 80EU on Intel. AMD is in the mobile market segment, Intel in the desktop market segment. TDP is 28 W for AMD and 45 W for Intel. Release dates are 2026-03-08T17:00:00.000Z for AMD and 2024-04-07T17:00:00.000Z for Intel. Both parts are active, and both have locked multipliers.

Where Each One Wins

The database records 0 benchmark wins for both processors, so no measured workload victory separates them. The specification fields, however, create clear use-case splits.

AMD is the only part with ECC memory support, a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, 16 PCIe lanes, and a 5.00 GHz boost clock. It also has the lower TDP at 28 W versus Intel's 45 W, and it is the only one with LPDDR5X support. Those features point to bandwidth-sensitive or power-constrained mobile and embedded designs.

Intel is the only part with DDR4 support, 12 cores, 18 MB shared L3, 2 MB per-core L2, a 2.60 GHz base clock, and a desktop Socket 1700 platform. Those features point to desktop designs where core count and cache capacity matter more than ECC or memory bandwidth.

The integrated graphics also differ. AMD has Radeon 880M, Intel has Iris Xe Graphics 80EU, so the choice of integrated graphics depends on the recorded graphics block rather than benchmark scores. The release dates also split the platforms. AMD is dated 2026-03-08T17:00:00.000Z, Intel is dated 2024-04-07T17:00:00.000Z, meaning Intel has the earlier recorded release date. With no benchmark data, these specification advantages are the only basis for a use-case split.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: Intel Core 5 130HL has 12 cores, while AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has 8 cores. Both have 16 threads.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has a 5.00 GHz boost clock. Intel Core 5 130HL has a 4.80 GHz boost clock. Intel has the higher base clock at 2.60 GHz versus AMD's 2.00 GHz.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i lists ECC memory as true. Intel Core 5 130HL lists ECC memory as false.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus. AMD records 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, while Intel has no recorded memory bandwidth figure.

Q: What sockets do these processors use?

A: AMD uses AMD Socket FP8. Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. AMD is in the mobile market segment, while Intel is in the desktop market segment.

Q: Are both processors active?

A: Yes, both are listed as Active. AMD's release date is 2026-03-08T17:00:00.000Z, and Intel's release date is 2024-04-07T17:00:00.000Z.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports selecting the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i for systems that need ECC memory, 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, 16 PCIe lanes, a 5.00 GHz boost clock, and a 28 W TDP. The recorded data supports selecting the Intel Core 5 130HL for systems that need 12 cores, 18 MB shared L3 cache, 2 MB per-core L2, DDR4 memory support, a 2.60 GHz base clock, and a desktop Socket 1700 platform.

Since neither processor has benchmark wins or an average benchmark score above 0, the verdict rests entirely on specification and platform fit. AMD addresses mobile and embedded use cases with lower power and ECC. Intel addresses desktop use cases with more cores and cache.

Specification Differences

The fields where the two records differ are shown below.

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i | Intel Core 5 130HL |

| Architecture | Not recorded | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-PS |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core 5 (Raptor Lake-PS) |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | 233 mm² | Not recorded |

| Cores | 8 | 12 |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.60 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.80 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |

| L3 cache | 8 MB | 18 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC memory | True | False |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 880M | Iris Xe Graphics 80EU |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release date | 2026-03-08T17:00:00.000Z | 2024-04-07T17:00:00.000Z |