AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i vs Intel Core 3 100UL Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i and the Intel Core 3 100UL. Both processors hold a percentile rank of 50 against all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 0. This means the two chips land at the exact midpoint of the performance distribution, but there are no direct comparison scores to establish a margin of victory in any specific workload.

Without measured scores, the wins column remains empty: winsA is 0 and winsB is 0. The absence of data prevents any claim about which part leads in multi-threaded rendering, single-thread responsiveness, or power-limited tasks. What the database does show is a structural difference in resource allocation: the AMD chip provides 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel chip provides 6 cores and 8 threads. That raw thread advantage of 8 additional threads for the AMD part suggests a theoretical edge in heavily parallel workloads, but the benchmark suite has not yet validated that expectation.

The Intel part counters with a higher per-core L2 cache allocation: 1.25 MB per core versus 1 MB per core for AMD. That 25% larger per-core L2 could benefit latency-sensitive loops that fit within that cache level, yet no recorded measurement confirms this in practice. Both parts share a 4 nm (AMD, TSMC) versus 10 nm (Intel, Intel foundry) process split, which typically favors the smaller node for efficiency, but again, no benchmark data exists to translate that into a performance delta.

The closest available reference points remain the percentile fields, which are identical at 50. This parity is unusual given the divergent core counts and clock speeds. The AMD processor boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the Intel part boosts to 4.50 GHz, a 500 MHz advantage for AMD. The base clocks differ even more starkly: 2.00 GHz for AMD versus 1.20 GHz for Intel. Higher base and boost clocks usually correlate with faster single-thread execution, but without benchmark scores, that correlation stays theoretical.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i wins on paper in core count, thread count, and clock frequency. Its 8 cores and 16 threads double the thread count of the Intel Core 3 100UL. The 5.00 GHz boost clock exceeds the Intel part's 4.50 GHz by 500 MHz. The base clock of 2.00 GHz is 800 MHz higher than the Intel part's 1.20 GHz. These specifications point toward AMD leading in CPU-bound workloads that scale with thread count, such as compilation, video encoding, or scientific simulation. The larger L3 cache (8 MB for AMD versus 10 MB shared for Intel) is actually smaller on AMD, but the per-core L1 is identical at 80 KB per core.

The Intel Core 3 100UL wins on power draw and platform flexibility. Its TDP of 15 W is 13 W lower than the AMD part's 28 W. That difference matters for passively cooled systems or fanless industrial designs where heat dissipation is the limiting factor. The Intel chip also supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD part supports only DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Systems with existing DDR4 inventory or cost-sensitive memory layouts favor Intel. The Intel part uses Socket 1700, a widespread desktop socket, whereas AMD uses Socket FP8, a mobile-focused package. For embedded deployments that reuse existing Socket 1700 carrier boards, Intel offers an easier integration path.

Memory bandwidth favors AMD: 89.6 GB/s is recorded for the AMD part, while the Intel part has no bandwidth figure in the database. The AMD chip also supports ECC memory, a critical feature for reliability in embedded computing, while the Intel part does not. The integrated graphics differ as well: AMD pairs with Radeon 880M, Intel with UHD Graphics 64EU. No graphics benchmarks exist in the database, so the comparison ends at the name and feature level.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design eras and foundry processes. AMD uses a 4 nm process from TSMC with the Gorgon Point codename, belonging to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. Intel uses a 10 nm process from its own fabs with the Raptor Lake-PS codename, belonging to the Core 3 generation built on Raptor Lake architecture. The process node difference of 4 nm versus 10 nm typically implies denser transistors and lower power per operation for AMD, but the database does not list transistor counts for either chip.

The AMD die size is 233 mm², while the Intel die size is not recorded. The cache hierarchies diverge beyond the total L3: AMD allocates 1 MB of L2 per core, Intel allocates 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache is 8 MB for AMD and 10 MB shared for Intel. Per-core L1 cache is identical at 80 KB. These cache layouts suggest Intel favors a slightly larger shared pool for cross-core data sharing, while AMD provides a consistent per-core L2.

Memory support differences are significant for embedded use. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, both dual-channel, with ECC enabled. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, without ECC. The AMD memory bandwidth is recorded at 89.6 GB/s; no equivalent figure exists for Intel. PCIe connectivity also differs: AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), Intel provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). That doubles the available CPU-attached PCIe lanes for AMD, which matters for add-in cards, NVMe storage, or FPGA accelerators.

The market segments differ as well: AMD is classified as Mobile, Intel as Desktop. Despite the desktop classification, the Intel TDP of 15 W is lower than the AMD TDP of 28 W. Release dates show Intel launched on 2024-04-07, while AMD launched on 2026-03-08, nearly two years later. Both are listed as Active in production status. Neither supports an unlocked multiplier.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core 3 100UL has 6 cores and 8 threads. AMD leads by 2 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What are the clock speed differences?

A: The AMD part has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 1.20 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. AMD holds a 800 MHz base clock advantage and a 500 MHz boost clock advantage.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 3 100UL does not list ECC support.

Q: What memory types does each support?

A: The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The AMD memory bandwidth is recorded at 89.6 GB/s; Intel has no recorded bandwidth figure.

Q: How do the process nodes compare?

A: AMD uses a 4 nm process from TSMC. Intel uses a 10 nm process from its own foundry. The AMD die size is 233 mm²; the Intel die size is not recorded.

Q: What are the market segments and sockets?

A: AMD is classified as Mobile with an AMD Socket FP8. Intel is classified as Desktop with an Intel Socket 1700. AMD has 16 PCIe Gen 4 lanes (CPU only), Intel has 8 PCIe Gen 4 lanes (CPU only).

The Verdict

The data supports two distinct deployment profiles. For workloads that demand high thread counts, high clock speeds, ECC reliability, and expansive PCIe connectivity, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i is the stronger choice on specifications alone. Its 8-core, 16-thread configuration with a 5.00 GHz boost clock and 16 PCIe lanes positions it for compute-heavy embedded tasks such as real-time data processing, virtualization hosts, or AI inference at the edge. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and LPDDR5X support further reinforce this role.

For power-constrained designs or those reusing existing infrastructure, the Intel Core 3 100UL offers a lower 15 W TDP, DDR4 compatibility, and a common Socket 1700 desktop platform. The 10 MB shared L3 cache exceeds AMD's 8 MB, and the per-core L2 of 1.25 MB is larger than AMD's 1 MB. These attributes favor latency-sensitive single-threaded workloads or systems where the total power envelope must stay minimal.

The lack of benchmark scores in the database means neither part can be declared a performance winner. The percentile ranks are identical at 50, and the average benchmark scores are both 0. The decision rests on the structural specifications: AMD wins on cores, threads, clocks, memory bandwidth, ECC, and PCIe lanes. Intel wins on TDP, memory type flexibility (DDR4 support), and L3 cache capacity. The release dates also differ, with Intel available since 2024-04-07 and AMD since 2026-03-08, which could affect platform availability.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i | Intel Core 3 100UL |

|----------------|-----------------------------|--------------------|

| Cores | 8 | 6 |

| Threads | 16 | 8 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.50 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Process Node | 4 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | Not recorded |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 10 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 880M | UHD Graphics 64EU |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | 2026-03-08 | 2024-04-07 |