AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i vs Intel Core 3 100U Comparison

The Verdict

The recorded data for these two mobile processors tells a clear story, but it is not a simple one. The Intel Core 3 100U has a complete set of benchmark results, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has none recorded in the database at the time of analysis. This means the Intel part holds the only measurable performance position, sitting at the 70th percentile among all CPUs tracked, with an average benchmark score of 16148. The AMD part is listed at the 50th percentile with a score of zero, which reflects missing data rather than a literal performance result.

For a buyer choosing strictly from the data, the Intel Core 3 100U is the only option with verified performance numbers. It delivers a multicore Cinebench R23 score of 10624 and a single-core score of 1499. Those are the figures that can be compared against anything else in the database. The AMD part cannot be positioned without its own scores, so any decision involving it must account for that gap. The Intel chip also carries a launch MSRP of $426, which is the only price information available for either unit.

The AMD processor is the newer design, with a release date in March 2026 versus January 2024 for the Intel. It uses a 4 nm TSMC process, has 8 cores and 16 threads, and boosts to 5.00 GHz. The Intel part uses a 10 nm Intel process, has 6 cores and 8 threads, and boosts to 4.70 GHz. On paper, the AMD chip has structural advantages, but the database does not yet contain the benchmark evidence to confirm how those translate into real-world results.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core 3 100U uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-U, and is built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. No die size is recorded for the Intel chip.

Core counts and threading differ significantly. The AMD part has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel part has 6 cores and 8 threads. The AMD base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost of 5.00 GHz, whereas the Intel base clock is 1.20 GHz with a boost of 4.70 GHz. The AMD chip has a 28 W TDP, and the Intel chip has a 15 W TDP. That power difference suggests the AMD part is designed for higher sustained performance, while the Intel part targets lower power envelopes.

Cache architecture also differs. Both use 80 KB of L1 per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 per core and 8 MB of L3. The Intel part has 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 10 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip has more aggregate L3, though it serves fewer cores. Memory support overlaps on DDR5, but the AMD chip also supports LPDDR5X, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 as well as DDR5. The AMD memory bandwidth is recorded at 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel figure is not listed. ECC memory is supported on the AMD part only. PCIe connectivity also differs: the AMD chip provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel chip provides Gen 4 with 8 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are Radeon 880M on the AMD side and UHD Graphics 64EU on the Intel side.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

There are no head-to-head benchmark entries recorded for these two processors, so no direct comparison scores exist in the database. The Intel Core 3 100U does have a full benchmark suite, and those results can be examined on their own merits. In Cinebench R23, the Intel chip scores 10624 multicore and 1499 single-core. In Cinebench R20, it scores 4462 multicore and 629 single-core. In Cinebench R15, it scores 1070 multicore and 150 single-core. All of these are recorded results for the Intel part only.

PassMark results for the Intel chip show a multithread score of 12522 and a single-thread score of 3506. The integer math score is 39580, floating point math is 28322, and extended instructions score 7894. Data compression scores 136497, while data encryption scores 8128. Random string sorting reaches 15191, physics scores 876, and find prime numbers scores 52. These numbers are the only benchmark values in the database for either processor.

The Intel part's nearest rivals in the database all have average scores close to its own. The Intel Core i7-10850H scores 16204, which is 0.3% lower than the Core 3 100U's average of 16148. The Intel Core i5-10600KF scores 16228, 0.5% lower. The Intel Core i7-1260U scores 16320, 1.1% lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 4600H scores 16341, 1.2% lower. These deltas indicate the Core 3 100U sits in a competitive band where small percentage differences separate it from several older mainstream processors. The percentile ranking of 70 reinforces that it lands above the median of all tracked CPUs, but it is not near the top of the distribution.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core 3 100U has 6 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?

A: The AMD part boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the Intel part boosts to 4.70 GHz. The AMD base clock is 2.00 GHz, and the Intel base clock is 1.20 GHz.

Q: Does the Intel Core 3 100U support ECC memory?

A: No. ECC memory support is listed only for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i. The Intel part does not have ECC support recorded.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

Q: What is the recorded average benchmark score for the Intel Core 3 100U?

A: The Intel Core 3 100U has an average benchmark score of 16148, placing it at the 70th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: Does the AMD processor have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: The database lists no benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i. Its average benchmark score is recorded as zero, and it has no nearest rivals listed.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 3 100U wins every category where measured results exist. It has a complete benchmark suite, a 70th percentile ranking, and an average score of 16148. It also has a smaller 15 W TDP, which makes it the better fit for power-constrained mobile designs. Its nearest rivals all score within 1.2% of its average, so it sits in a well-established performance tier among existing laptops. The recorded Cinebench and PassMark figures give it a concrete performance profile that can be matched against real workloads.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164i wins on specifications that do not require benchmark confirmation. It has more cores, more threads, a higher boost clock, a smaller 4 nm process node, a larger 233 mm² die, and support for LPDDR5X and ECC memory. It also has double the PCIe lanes from the CPU (16 versus 8) and a higher memory bandwidth figure of 89.6 GB/s. Its 28 W TDP suggests it is built for higher sustained performance than the 15 W Intel part, though the database does not yet show the scores to prove it.

Specification Differences

The socket types differ: the AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8, and the Intel part uses Intel BGA 1744. The AMD processor is from the Gorgon Point codename with Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, while the Intel processor is Raptor Lake-U. Process nodes are 4 nm at TSMC for AMD and 10 nm at Intel for the Intel chip. The AMD die size is 233 mm², while the Intel die size is not recorded.

Core and thread counts differ: 8 cores and 16 threads for AMD, 6 cores and 8 threads for Intel. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for AMD and 1.20 GHz for Intel. Boost clocks are 5.00 GHz for AMD and 4.70 GHz for Intel. TDP is 28 W for AMD and 15 W for Intel.

Cache configurations differ. L1 is 80 KB per core for both. L2 is 1 MB per core for AMD and 1.25 MB per core for Intel. L3 is 8 MB for AMD and 10 MB shared for Intel.

Memory support differs: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for AMD, with no figure recorded for Intel. ECC memory is supported on AMD only. PCIe is Gen 4 with 16 lanes for AMD and Gen 4 with 8 lanes for Intel. Integrated graphics are Radeon 880M for AMD and UHD Graphics 64EU for Intel.

Release dates differ: the AMD part is dated March 2026, and the Intel part is dated January 2024. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $426; no MSRP is recorded for the AMD part. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The Intel part number is SRMYL, while the AMD part number is listed as unknown. The Intel part has a 70th percentile ranking and an average score of 16148; the AMD part has a 50th percentile ranking and an average score of zero, with no recorded benchmarks or rivals.