AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 vs Intel Processor U302L Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 has recorded benchmark scores across eleven PassMark tests, while the Intel Processor U302L has no benchmark entries in the database. This means every head-to-head comparison must be framed as the P164's absolute results, with the U302L serving as a reference point only through its specification profile.

The P164's strongest single-thread result is 4029 in both the passmark_single_thread and passmark_singlethread tests. Its multithread score is 25889, which is roughly 6.4 times the single-thread figure, indicating strong scaling across its 8 cores and 16 threads. The integer math score of 87940 and floating point math score of 55799 show a heavy workload advantage in computation-heavy tasks. Data compression scores 327891, while data encryption hits 16055. Extended instructions reach 24193, and random string sorting completes at 34801. Physics simulation posts 1210, and find prime numbers records 71.

The average benchmark score for the P164 is 52901, placing it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F with an average score of 52873 (a delta of 0.1 percent, meaning the P164 is marginally ahead), the Intel Xeon 634 at 52974 (delta of -0.1 percent, marginally behind), the AMD EPYC 7313P at 53206 (delta of -0.6 percent), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X at 53288 (delta of -0.7 percent). These deltas are all within one percent, so the P164 sits in a tightly packed performance cluster. The P164 is essentially tied with the Ryzen 5 9500F and Xeon 634, while trailing the EPYC 7313P and Ryzen 9 7900X by less than one percent.

Because the U302L has no recorded benchmark scores, its average benchmark score is zero, and its percentile is 50. The database provides no nearest rivals for the U302L. The data cannot confirm any benchmark wins for either processor, as the head-to-head benchmark array is empty. The P164's scores stand alone as the only quantitative performance evidence.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Processor U302L uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-PS codename, and belongs to the Intel Processor generation built on Raptor Lake cores. It uses a 10 nm process manufactured by Intel, with no die size recorded.

The P164 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the U302L has 5 cores and 6 threads. The P164's L1 cache is 80 KB per core, matching the U302L's 80 KB per core. The L2 cache differs: the P164 has 1 MB per core, while the U302L has 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache also differs: the P164 has 8 MB total, while the U302L has 10 MB shared.

The P164 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the U302L supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The P164 has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the U302L has no memory bandwidth figure recorded. The P164 supports ECC memory, while the U302L does not.

The P164's integrated graphics is the Radeon 880M, while the U302L uses UHD Graphics 80EU. The P164 provides PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the U302L provides PCIe Gen 4 with 8 lanes (CPU only). The P164 is unlocked no multiplier, as is the U302L.

The P164 uses AMD Socket FP8, while the U302L uses Intel Socket 1700. The P164 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The U302L has a base clock of 1.20 GHz and a boost clock of 2.40 GHz. The P164 has a TDP of 28 watts, while the U302L has a TDP of 15 watts. Both are mobile market segments and both are in active production. The P164 has no recorded launch MSRP, while the U302L has a launch MSRP of $285.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 wins decisively in every measurable performance category because it is the only processor with recorded benchmark scores. Its single-thread score of 4029 indicates strong per-core performance, which is relevant for lightly threaded applications. Its multithread score of 25889, combined with 8 cores and 16 threads, positions it for heavily parallel workloads such as rendering, compilation, or scientific computation.

The P164's data compression score of 327891 and random string sorting score of 34801 suggest strong performance in data processing and database workloads. Its encryption score of 16055 and extended instructions score of 24193 indicate capability in cryptographic and SIMD-heavy tasks. The integer math score of 87940 and floating point math score of 55799 point to solid general compute performance. The physics score of 1210 and find prime numbers score of 71 round out the suite.

The Intel Processor U302L has no benchmark scores, so the database does not record any wins for it. Its lower core count (5 cores, 6 threads), lower base clock (1.20 GHz), and lower boost clock (2.40 GHz) suggest it is positioned for lower-power operation with its 15 watt TDP. It also has a smaller PCIe lane count (8 lanes vs 16 lanes) and no ECC support. The U302L does have a larger L2 cache per core (1.25 MB vs 1 MB) and a larger L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB), which could benefit certain cache-sensitive workloads, but no benchmark data confirms this advantage.

In practical terms, the P164 is the clear choice for any task that requires computational throughput. The U302L's strengths, if any, would have to come from its lower power envelope and potentially lower thermal output, but the database provides no performance measurements to substantiate a win in any specific workload.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specification fields:

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 | Intel Processor U302L |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 8 | 5 |

| Threads | 16 | 6 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 2.40 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-PS |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | Not recorded |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB | 10 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe Lanes | 16 (CPU only) | 8 (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 880M | UHD Graphics 80EU |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $285 |

| Part Number | Unknown | SRPKGQ5CX |

Both processors share the same L1 cache size (80 KB per core), dual-channel memory bus, Gen 4 PCIe, mobile market segment, active production status, and locked multiplier.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Processor U302L has 5 cores and 6 threads.

Q: What are the clock speed differences?

A: The P164 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The U302L has a base clock of 1.20 GHz and a boost clock of 2.40 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor U302L does not support ECC memory.

Q: How do the integrated graphics compare?

A: The P164 uses Radeon 880M integrated graphics, while the U302L uses UHD Graphics 80EU.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of each processor?

A: The P164 has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The U302L has no memory bandwidth figure recorded in the database.

Q: Which processor has a higher TDP?

A: The P164 has a TDP of 28 watts, which is higher than the U302L's TDP of 15 watts.

Q: What is the process node difference?

A: The P164 is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The U302L is manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Processor U302L?

A: The U302L has a launch MSRP of $285. The P164 has no recorded launch MSRP.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 as the only processor with benchmark scores, and those scores place it at the 91st percentile among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 52901 is effectively tied with several high-end desktop processors, including the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F, Intel Xeon 634, AMD EPYC 7313P, and AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, all within a 0.7 percent delta.

The Intel Processor U302L has no benchmark scores, a 50th percentile ranking, an average score of zero, and no nearest rivals. Its specification profile shows fewer cores, lower clocks, lower TDP, and a smaller PCIe lane count. The only advantages recorded for the U302L are a larger L2 cache per core (1.25 MB vs 1 MB), a larger L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB), and support for DDR4 memory in addition to DDR5.

For any user selecting between these two based on database measurements, the P164 is the only option with demonstrated performance. Its 8-core, 16-thread configuration, 5.00 GHz boost clock, and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth provide a strong foundation for multithreaded and single-threaded workloads alike. The U302L may appeal to scenarios requiring lower power consumption (15 watts vs 28 watts) or a specific socket compatibility, but the database records no performance evidence to support such a choice. The P164 leads in every measurable category, and the data does not indicate any benchmark where the U302L competes.