AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 vs Intel Processor U300L Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a substantial performance gap between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 and the Intel Processor U300L. The AMD chip posts an average benchmark score of 52901 across the PassMark suite, while the Intel part has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, leaving its average at zero. This makes a direct score-by-score comparison impossible for most workloads, but the available data still provides a clear picture for the AMD side.

The Ryzen AI Embedded P164 delivers a PassMark single-thread score of 4029. Its multithread score reaches 25889. Integer math completes at 87940, floating point math at 55799, and extended instructions at 24193. Data compression scores 327891, data encryption 16055, prime number finding 71, physics 1210, and random string sorting 34801.

Because the Intel Processor U300L has no entries in the benchmark database, the head-to-head comparison relies on the AMD chip's percentile and rival positioning. The Ryzen AI Embedded P164 sits at the 91st percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F with an average score of 52873, a delta of 0.1 percent ahead of the P164. The Intel Xeon 634 scores 52974, which is 0.1 percent above the P164. The AMD EPYC 7313P reaches 53206, 0.6 percent higher, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X scores 53288, 0.7 percent higher. This cluster of rivals, all within one percentage point, places the P164 in strong company for both desktop and server-class workloads.

The Intel Processor U300L, by contrast, sits at the 50th percentile with no average score recorded. That percentile places it at the median of the database, but without benchmark numbers, the database cannot quantify its absolute performance. The absence of scores for the U300L means the data cannot confirm any specific workload advantage for the Intel part. The analysis must therefore center on the AMD chip's measured results and architectural positioning.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 shows its strengths across every benchmark category where data exists. The multithread score of 25889 indicates strong parallel workload performance, consistent with its 8 cores and 16 threads. The integer math score of 87940 and floating point math score of 55799 point to solid general-purpose compute capability. Data compression at 327891 is the highest raw score in the recorded set, suggesting the P164 handles compression workloads particularly well. Extended instructions at 24193 reflect capable SIMD and encryption-adjacent processing. Data encryption at 16055 shows moderate throughput for cryptographic tasks. Random string sorting at 34801 indicates good memory-bound sorting performance. Physics at 1210 is a lower score relative to the other categories but still represents a usable result for simulation-style tasks.

The single-thread score of 4029, paired with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, gives the P164 a strong foundation for lightly threaded applications. The 91st percentile ranking confirms that the chip outperforms the vast majority of CPUs in the database on average. Its rival cluster, including the Ryzen 9 7900X and EPYC 7313P, shows that the P164 trades blows with high-end desktop and server parts within a narrow 0.7 percent band.

The Intel Processor U300L has no recorded wins because no benchmark data exists for it. The database lists its specifications, including 5 cores, 6 threads, a base clock of 1.20 GHz, and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, but no performance measurements accompany those specs. The 50th percentile ranking is a positional figure, not a measured result. Without scores, the data cannot assign any workload victory to the U300L.

The Verdict

The data directs a clear conclusion: the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 is the measured performer in this pairing. It holds a 91st percentile position, an average score of 52901, and a full suite of benchmark results across single-thread, multithread, integer, floating point, compression, encryption, physics, and sorting tests. Its nearest rivals, all within 0.7 percent, include the Ryzen 9 7900X, EPYC 7313P, Intel Xeon 634, and Ryzen 5 9500F. That company indicates the P164 performs at a level comparable to established high-end desktop and workstation processors.

The Intel Processor U300L presents no benchmark data, so the database cannot verify its performance. Its 50th percentile places it at the median, but that figure carries no measured weight. The U300L does offer a lower 15 W TDP compared to the P164's 28 W, which may matter for power-constrained designs, but the data provides no performance evidence to weigh against that power difference.

From the recorded numbers, the Ryzen AI Embedded P164 is the choice for anyone prioritizing measured compute performance. The U300L's role in the database remains unverified until benchmark results populate its entry.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 has an average benchmark score of 52901. The Intel Processor U300L has an average benchmark score of 0 because no benchmark results are recorded for it.

Q: How does the Ryzen AI Embedded P164 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The P164 scores 0.1 percent above the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F, 0.1 percent below the Intel Xeon 634, 0.6 percent below the AMD EPYC 7313P, and 0.7 percent below the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X.

Q: What percentile does each processor hold?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 sits at the 91st percentile among all CPUs. The Intel Processor U300L sits at the 50th percentile.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Processor U300L has 5 cores and 6 threads.

Q: Does the Intel Processor U300L have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the Intel Processor U300L, which is why its average score is 0 and its nearest rivals list is empty.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 boosts to 5.00 GHz. The Intel Processor U300L boosts to 4.40 GHz.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on the Zen 5 and Zen 5c microarchitectures. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Processor U300L uses the Raptor Lake architecture, codenamed Raptor Lake-PS, and belongs to the Intel Processor generation built on Raptor Lake. It uses a 10 nm process at Intel. The two designs therefore represent different process generations, different foundries, and different core designs.

The AMD chip offers 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel chip offers 5 cores and 6 threads. Both use 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD chip uses 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel chip uses 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The L3 capacities match at 8 MB, but the per-core L2 allocation differs, with the Intel part providing a slightly larger L2 per core.

Memory support also differs. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with no memory bandwidth figure recorded. ECC memory is supported on the AMD chip but not on the Intel chip.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD chip uses the Radeon 880M, while the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 48EU. PCIe support is Gen 4 for both, but the AMD chip provides 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel chip provides 8 lanes from the CPU.

Production status is active for both processors. The AMD chip has no part number listed, while the Intel chip has the part number SRPEKSRPEM. The AMD chip has no launch MSRP recorded, while the Intel chip lists a launch MSRP of $107.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several recorded specifications. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Processor U300L has 5 cores and 6 threads. Base clocks differ at 2.00 GHz for the AMD chip and 1.20 GHz for the Intel chip. Boost clocks differ at 5.00 GHz for the AMD chip and 4.40 GHz for the Intel chip. Thermal design power differs at 28 W for the AMD chip and 15 W for the Intel chip.

Sockets differ. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700. The process nodes differ at 4 nm for the AMD chip and 10 nm for the Intel chip. Foundries differ at TSMC for AMD and Intel for the Intel part. Die size is recorded only for the AMD chip at 233 mm², with no die size listed for the Intel chip.

Cache configurations differ in L2 allocation. The AMD chip uses 1 MB of L2 per core, while the Intel chip uses 1.25 MB of L2 per core. Both have 8 MB of L3 cache, but the AMD chip lists it as 8 MB without specifying shared or per-core, while the Intel chip lists it as 8 MB shared. Memory support differs, with the AMD chip supporting DDR5 and LPDDR5X and the Intel chip supporting DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is recorded only for the AMD chip at 89.6 GB/s. ECC support differs, with the AMD chip supporting ECC and the Intel chip not supporting it.

PCIe lane counts differ, with the AMD chip offering 16 CPU lanes and the Intel chip offering 8 CPU lanes, both at Gen 4. Integrated graphics differ, with the AMD chip using Radeon 880M and the Intel chip using UHD Graphics 48EU. Release dates differ, with the AMD chip dated 2026-03-08 and the Intel chip dated 2024-04-07. The launch MSRP is recorded only for the Intel chip at $107. Both processors have locked multipliers. The market segment is mobile for both. The Intel chip has a recorded part number, SRPEKSRPEM, while the AMD chip does not have a part number listed.