AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 vs Intel Processor 300T Comparison

The Verdict

The data presents a stark performance separation between these two processors. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 sits at the 91st percentile among all CPUs in the database, while the Intel Processor 300T sits at the 50th percentile. The AMD part delivers 8 cores and 16 threads with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, whereas the Intel part provides 2 cores and 4 threads with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and no listed boost clock. The AMD chip is the clear choice for any workload that scales with thread count or benefits from high single-thread frequency. The Intel Processor 300T, with its 35 W TDP and desktop Socket 1700 mount, targets basic computing tasks where the AMD part's characteristics are unnecessary. The database shows the AMD part has a substantial multi-core advantage, while the Intel part offers a simpler dual-core configuration for lighter duties.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 / Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Processor 300T uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-S codename and is built on a 10 nm process at Intel with a die size of 163 mm². The AMD part has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel part has 2 cores and 4 threads. Cache configurations also differ: the AMD chip has 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, matching the Intel chip's L1 but the Intel chip has 1.25 MB of L2 per core. The AMD part has 8 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel part has 6 MB of shared L3.

Memory support diverges as well. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with dual-channel access and a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. It also supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor 300T supports DDR4 and DDR5 with dual-channel access, but the database lists no memory bandwidth figure and no ECC support. The AMD part uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, while the Intel part uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. Integrated graphics differ: the AMD part uses the Radeon 880M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 710. The AMD chip is classified as a Mobile segment part with an AMD Socket FP8, whereas the Intel chip is a Desktop segment part with Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part's release date is 2026-03-08, while the Intel part's release date is 2024-01-07. The Intel part has a known part number, SRN3K, while the AMD part's part number is listed as unknown.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What are the clock speed differences?

A: The AMD part has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 3.40 GHz, and the database lists no boost clock for it.

Q: How do their process nodes compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Processor 300T is built on a 10 nm process at Intel.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor 300T does not list ECC support in the database.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The AMD part has a listed memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part has no memory bandwidth figure in the database.

Q: What are their market segments?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 is classified as a Mobile segment processor with an AMD Socket FP8. The Intel Processor 300T is classified as a Desktop segment processor with Intel Socket 1700.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every specification field. Core count: AMD has 8, Intel has 2. Thread count: AMD has 16, Intel has 4. Base clock: AMD is 2.00 GHz, Intel is 3.40 GHz. Boost clock: AMD has 5.00 GHz, Intel has none listed. TDP: AMD is 28 W, Intel is 35 W. Socket: AMD uses AMD Socket FP8, Intel uses Intel Socket 1700. Codename: AMD is Gorgon Point, Intel is Raptor Lake-S. Generation: AMD is Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c), Intel is Intel Processor (Raptor Lake). Process node: AMD is 4 nm, Intel is 10 nm. Foundry: AMD uses TSMC, Intel uses Intel. Die size: AMD is 233 mm², Intel is 163 mm². L2 cache per core: AMD has 1 MB, Intel has 1.25 MB. L3 cache: AMD has 8 MB, Intel has 6 MB shared. Memory support: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth: AMD has 89.6 GB/s, Intel has none listed. ECC memory: AMD supports it, Intel does not. PCIe: AMD has Gen 4 with 16 lanes, Intel has Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics: AMD uses Radeon 880M, Intel uses UHD Graphics 710. Market segment: AMD is Mobile, Intel is Desktop. Release date: AMD is 2026-03-08, Intel is 2024-01-07. Part number: AMD is unknown, Intel is SRN3K. The Intel part also has a launch MSRP of $82, which is not listed for the AMD part.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 but no individual benchmark scores for the Intel Processor 300T. The AMD part's average benchmark score is 52901, and its percentile rank is 91. The Intel part's average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its percentile rank is 50. Direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons are not available in the database, so the analysis relies on the AMD part's recorded scores and the Intel part's percentile position.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 shows strong results across the recorded PassMark tests. Its multithread score is 25889, which aligns with its 8-core, 16-thread configuration. The single-thread score is 4029, reflecting the 5.00 GHz boost clock. Integer math scores reach 87940, floating-point math scores reach 55799, and extended instructions score 24193. Data encryption scores 16055, data compression scores 327891, and random string sorting scores 34801. The physics score is 1210, and the find prime numbers score is 71.

The nearest rivals for the AMD part provide context for its average score. The AMD Ryzen 5 9500F has an average score of 52873, which is 0.1% lower. The Intel Xeon 634 has an average score of 52974, which is 0.1% higher. The AMD EPYC 7313P has an average score of 53206, which is 0.6% higher. The AMD Ryzen 9 7900X has an average score of 53288, which is 0.7% higher. These small deltas place the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 within a tight cluster of capable processors, all within 0.7% of each other in average score.

The Intel Processor 300T's lack of recorded benchmark scores means the database cannot quantify its performance against the AMD part directly. Its 50th percentile rank indicates it sits at the median of all CPUs, while the AMD part at the 91st percentile sits well above it. The Intel part has no nearest rivals listed, which further limits direct comparison.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 wins in every measured performance category. Its 8 cores and 16 threads give it a decisive advantage in multi-threaded workloads, as reflected in its multithread score of 25889. The 5.00 GHz boost clock supports strong single-thread performance with a score of 4029. The AMD part also wins in memory-related features: it supports ECC memory, has a listed memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, and supports LPDDR5X in addition to DDR5. Its 4 nm process at TSMC suggests a more advanced manufacturing approach than the Intel part's 10 nm process. The AMD part's 28 W TDP is lower than the Intel part's 35 W TDP, which may indicate higher efficiency per watt, though the database does not provide direct power efficiency measurements.

The Intel Processor 300T wins in certain specification areas. It has a higher base clock at 3.40 GHz compared to the AMD part's 2.00 GHz, which may benefit lightly threaded workloads that rely on base frequency. It supports DDR4 memory in addition to DDR5, which could be relevant for systems using older memory modules. It uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, a newer PCIe generation than the AMD part's Gen 4. Its die size is smaller at 163 mm² versus 233 mm². The Intel part is also listed with a launch MSRP of $82, and its socket is Intel Socket 1700, which is a desktop platform. The Intel part's 2-core, 4-thread configuration with a 35 W TDP may suit basic desktop tasks where the AMD part's mobile-oriented design is not needed.

The data does not record any head-to-head benchmark wins for either processor, and neither has a wins count above zero. The performance gap between the two is best summarized by their percentile ranks: 91 for the AMD part versus 50 for the Intel part. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 is positioned for demanding workloads that benefit from 16 threads, high boost clocks, and broad memory features. The Intel Processor 300T is positioned for entry-level desktop use where its dual-core design and DDR4 compatibility may be sufficient. The database shows no benchmark results for the Intel part, so its actual performance cannot be compared numerically with the AMD part's recorded scores.