AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 vs Intel Core i5-14500T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a clear, though not total, victory for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164. Across the eleven shared benchmark tests, the AMD part claims eight wins, while the Intel Core i5-14500T takes three. The size of those wins, however, tells a more nuanced story about where each processor is strong.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 delivers its most decisive performance in the extended instruction test, scoring 24193 against Intel's 16043, a margin of 50.8%. This is the single largest gap in the entire comparison, indicating a substantial advantage in workloads that use advanced instruction sets such as AVX-512 or similar. The AMD chip also dominates data compression, scoring 327891 to Intel's 262417, a 25% lead. This suggests the AMD processor is significantly better at handling compressed data streams or archive operations. Random string sorting, another latency-sensitive workload, also favors AMD by a wide margin: 34801 versus 28462, a difference of 22.3%.

The AMD part also wins the headline multi-threaded benchmark, scoring 25889 against Intel's 22910, a 13% advantage. This is an important result because the Intel chip has more physical cores and threads, yet the AMD processor still manages to pull ahead in overall parallel performance. The single-thread score also favors AMD, with 4029 against 3736, a 7.8% lead. This indicates better per-core efficiency, likely stemming from the newer microarchitecture. Integer math is another AMD win, 87940 versus 80922, an 8.7% margin. The data encryption test is closer, with AMD winning at 16055 versus 15410, a modest 4.2% advantage.

The Intel Core i5-14500T, despite losing the overall benchmark count, holds its ground in specific computational tasks. Its best result comes in the prime number search test, scoring 81 against AMD's 71, a 12.3% lead. This is a notable reversal, as prime number generation tends to be sensitive to cache behavior and branch prediction. The Intel chip also wins floating point math, scoring 58869 versus AMD's 55799, a 5.2% margin. This indicates that for certain scientific or simulation workloads, the Intel part retains a measurable edge. The physics test also goes to Intel, 1288 against 1210, a 6.1% difference.

The overall average benchmark scores reflect these discrete results. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 posts an average benchmark score of 52901, placing it in the 91st percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F (52873, 0.1% slower) and the Intel Xeon 634 (52974, 0.1% faster), showing it sits in a highly competitive performance band. The Intel Core i5-14500T, by contrast, has an average benchmark score of 28065, which places it in the 80th percentile. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE (28054, 0.0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 435 (28128, 0.2% faster), indicating it is competitive within a much lower performance tier.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies and manufacturing processes. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Core i5-14500T uses a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. This process advantage helps explain AMD's higher single-thread performance and better power efficiency, as the smaller node allows for tighter transistor packing and lower switching losses.

The core configurations differ substantially. AMD uses 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Gorgon Point codename, which belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation featuring a mix of Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. Intel counters with 14 cores and 20 threads on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. The Intel part uses a hybrid design, though the database does not specify the exact P-core and E-core split. What matters for comparison is that Intel has six more cores and four more threads, yet still loses the multi-threaded benchmark.

The cache hierarchy also diverges. Both processors share an identical L1 cache of 80 KB per core. However, the L2 cache differs: AMD uses 1 MB per core, while Intel uses 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache is where the biggest difference appears. AMD has a relatively small 8 MB of L3 cache, while Intel has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This threefold difference in last-level cache could explain why Intel wins the prime number and floating point tests, as those workloads often benefit from larger cache residency. The AMD chip's smaller L3 is apparently compensated by its faster core architecture and higher boost clock.

Clock speeds favor AMD. The base clock is 2.00 GHz versus Intel's 1.70 GHz, and the boost clock is 5.00 GHz versus 4.80 GHz. The AMD part also has a lower TDP of 28 watts compared to Intel's 35 watts, which is remarkable given that AMD still manages higher performance in most tests. The die size is similar, with AMD at 233 mm² and Intel at 215 mm², though the different process nodes make direct comparison of transistor density difficult.

Memory support shows a generational split. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The memory bus is dual-channel for both. AMD lists a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the database does not record a bandwidth figure for Intel. Both support ECC memory, which is important for embedded and workstation reliability. PCIe connectivity also differs: AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes, giving the Intel platform a theoretical advantage for future expansion cards or storage devices.

The integrated graphics differ as well. AMD uses the Radeon 880M, while Intel uses the UHD Graphics 770. The database does not include graphics benchmarks, so no direct comparison is possible, but the Radeon 880M is generally a more capable integrated solution for the AMD platform.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 is the stronger processor for most general-purpose and data-heavy workloads. Its 50.8% lead in extended instructions makes it the clear choice for applications that compile code with modern instruction sets, run cryptographic algorithms, or process multimedia filters. The 25% advantage in data compression means file archiving, database compression, and backup software will run noticeably faster. The 22.3% lead in random string sorting suggests the AMD chip excels at sorting large datasets, a common operation in database management and data analytics. The 8.7% win in integer math covers a broad swath of business applications, while the 13% multi-thread advantage and 7.8% single-thread lead make it the better all-around processor for mixed workloads.

The Intel Core i5-14500T wins in three specific areas. The 12.3% lead in prime number search indicates a strength in recursive or branching workloads that fit within its larger 24 MB L3 cache. The 5.2% win in floating point math makes it the better option for scientific simulations, 3D rendering calculations, or any task that relies heavily on non-integer arithmetic. The 6.1% physics test win, which typically involves rigid body or particle simulations, reinforces this pattern. These are not trivial workloads, but they are more specialized than the general tasks where AMD dominates.

The percentile rankings provide additional context. The AMD part sits at the 91st percentile, which is a high-performance tier shared with desktop-class processors like the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, which is only 0.7% faster. The Intel part sits at the 80th percentile, which is a solid mid-range position but clearly a step below the AMD part's performance class. This explains why the average benchmark score gap is so large: 52901 versus 28065. The Intel chip is competitive within its own tier, but the AMD chip competes with much faster hardware.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification field.

• Cores: AMD has 8 cores, Intel has 14 cores.
• Threads: AMD has 16 threads, Intel has 20 threads.
• Base clock: AMD runs at 2.00 GHz, Intel at 1.70 GHz.
• Boost clock: AMD boosts to 5.00 GHz, Intel to 4.80 GHz.
• TDP: AMD is rated at 28 watts, Intel at 35 watts.
• Process node: AMD uses 4 nm, Intel uses 10 nm.
• Foundry: AMD is built at TSMC, Intel at Intel.
• Die size: AMD measures 233 mm², Intel measures 215 mm².
• L2 cache: AMD has 1 MB per core, Intel has 1.25 MB per core.
• L3 cache: AMD has 8 MB total, Intel has 24 MB shared.
• Memory support: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5.
• Memory bandwidth: AMD lists 89.6 GB/s, Intel has no recorded figure.
• PCIe: AMD uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes, Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes.
• Integrated graphics: AMD uses Radeon 880M, Intel uses UHD Graphics 770.
• Market segment: AMD targets Mobile, Intel targets Desktop.
• Socket: AMD uses AMD Socket FP8, Intel uses Intel Socket 1700.
• Codename: AMD is Gorgon Point, Intel is Raptor Lake-R.
• Generation: AMD is Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c), Intel is Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh).
• Release date: AMD launched on 2026-03-08, Intel on 2024-01-07.
• Launch MSRP: Intel is listed at $232, AMD has no MSRP recorded.
• Part number: Intel is SRN3P, AMD is unknown.

FAQ

Q: Which processor is faster in single-threaded workloads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 scores 4029 in the single-thread Passmark test, which is 7.8% higher than the Intel Core i5-14500T's score of 3736.

Q: Does the Intel chip's higher core count translate to better multi-threaded performance?

A: No. Despite having 14 cores and 20 threads versus AMD's 8 cores and 16 threads, the Intel chip scores 22910 in the multithread test, which is 13% lower than AMD's score of 25889.

Q: Why does the Intel processor win the prime number test?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500T scores 81 in the prime number search test versus AMD's 71, a 12.3% advantage. This likely relates to its larger 24 MB shared L3 cache, which can hold more working data for recursive and branching workloads.

Q: What is the biggest performance gap between the two processors?

A: The extended instructions test shows the largest difference. The AMD processor scores 24193, which is 50.8% higher than Intel's score of 16043.

Q: Which processor has better memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 lists a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The database does not record a memory bandwidth figure for the Intel Core i5-14500T.

Q: How do their overall performance percentiles compare?

A: The AMD processor is in the 91st percentile of all CPUs with an average score of 52901. The Intel processor is in the 80th percentile with an average score of 28065.

The Verdict

The benchmark data indicates that the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 is the stronger processor in most measurable ways. It wins eight of the eleven head-to-head tests, including the most important ones for general computing: single-thread performance, multi-threaded performance, integer math, data compression, and extended instructions. Its 91st percentile ranking places it in the same performance band as processors like the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, which is only 0.7% faster. The fact that it achieves this with a 28 watt TDP, lower than Intel's 35 watts, makes it an exceptionally efficient design. The mobile market segment and FP8 socket indicate it is intended for embedded or laptop systems where power and space are constrained, but the performance data shows it does not sacrifice capability for efficiency.

The Intel Core i5-14500T, on the other hand, is a desktop processor with a broader core layout and a larger L3 cache. It wins the floating point, physics, and prime number tests, making it a viable option for scientific computing or simulation workloads that rely on those specific operations. Its 80th percentile ranking and average score of 28065 place it in a significantly lower performance tier, comparable to the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 8500GE and Intel Core i9-12900H. The 24 MB L3 cache and Gen 5 PCIe support are meaningful for certain use cases, and the launch MSRP of $232 makes it a known quantity in the desktop market. The AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP.

For a user prioritizing raw performance across the majority of workloads, especially those involving data processing, encryption, or compilation, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 is the clear choice based on the recorded measurements. For a user whose primary tasks involve floating point math, physical simulations, or prime number generation, the Intel Core i5-14500T provides a measurable advantage in those specific tests, despite losing the overall performance battle. The data does not support a recommendation for the Intel chip as a general-purpose alternative, but it does confirm that the Intel part holds distinct advantages in its three winning benchmark categories.