AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 vs Intel Core 3 100UL Comparison

The database compares the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 and the Intel Core 3 100UL from an asymmetric starting point: the AMD part has recorded benchmark scores, while the Intel part has none. The AMD part carries an average benchmark score of 52901 and a 91st percentile overall standing. The Intel part carries an average benchmark score of 0 and a 50th percentile overall standing. That asymmetry defines the entire comparison.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core 3 100UL has 6 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What are the process nodes?

A: The AMD part uses TSMC's 4 nm process. The Intel part uses Intel's 10 nm process.

Q: Does the Intel Core 3 100UL have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the Intel part, its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile is 50. The AMD part has a 91st percentile overall standing.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 supports ECC memory. The Intel Core 3 100UL does not.

Q: How does the AMD part compare with its closest competitor records?

A: Its average benchmark score is 52901. It is 0.1% above the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F, 0.1% below the Intel Xeon 634, 0.6% below the AMD EPYC 7313P, and 0.7% below the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X.

Architecture Differences

The two processors use different designs, different process nodes, and different core arrangements. The AMD part is from the Gorgon Point generation with Zen 5 / Zen 5c cores. The Intel part is from the Raptor Lake-PS generation with Raptor Lake architecture. AMD's process is 4 nm at TSMC; Intel's process is 10 nm at Intel. The AMD part supplies 8 cores and 16 threads, while the Intel part supplies 6 cores and 8 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 and 1.20, boost clocks are 5.00 and 4.50, and TDPs are 28 and 15.

The cache hierarchy also diverges. Both parts list 80 KB of L1 per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 per core and 8 MB of L3. The Intel part has 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 10 MB of shared L3.

Memory support differs as well. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory, but the AMD part lists 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth and ECC support, while the Intel part lists no memory bandwidth and no ECC support. The PCIe interfaces are both Gen 4, but the AMD part has 16 lanes (CPU only) and the Intel part has 8 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics are the Radeon 880M on AMD and the UHD Graphics 64EU on Intel. AMD uses Socket FP8 and is classified as mobile; Intel uses Socket 1700 and is classified as desktop. The AMD die size is 233 mm², while the Intel die size is not recorded. Release dates are 2026-03-08 for AMD and 2024-04-07 for Intel.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database has no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for this pair. The recorded win counts are 0 for both parts. The Intel part has an empty benchmark list and an average benchmark score of 0, so there is no Intel score to place against any AMD result. The AMD part's standalone benchmark results are the only measured data in this comparison.

| Test | Score |

| --- | --- |

| passmark_data_compression | 327891 |

| passmark_data_encryption | 16055 |

| passmark_extended_instructions | 24193 |

| passmark_find_prime_numbers | 71 |

| passmark_floating_point_math | 55799 |

| passmark_integer_math | 87940 |

| passmark_multithread | 25889 |

| passmark_physics | 1210 |

| passmark_random_string_sorting | 34801 |

| passmark_single_thread | 4029 |

| passmark_singlethread | 4029 |

The AMD part's average benchmark score is 52901. Its closest competitor records in the database are the AMD Ryzen 5 9500F at 52873, the Intel Xeon 634 at 52974, the AMD EPYC 7313P at 53206, and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X at 53288. The percentage differences are 0.1, -0.1, -0.6, and -0.7, respectively. That places the AMD part in the same measured performance band as those processors, despite its mobile classification.

The Verdict

The verdict follows from the recorded data. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 has a measured average benchmark score of 52901 and a 91st percentile overall standing. The Intel Core 3 100UL has no measured scores, an average benchmark score of 0, and a 50th percentile overall standing. In a comparison based on benchmark results, the AMD part is the only processor with evidence of performance. The Intel part's lower TDP of 15, compared with AMD's 28, is a recorded specification difference, but it is not accompanied by any benchmark score. The database therefore cannot assign a performance outcome to the Intel part.

Specification Differences

| Field | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P164 | Intel Core 3 100UL |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Architecture | Not recorded | Raptor Lake |

| Codename / generation | Gorgon Point / Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Raptor Lake-PS / Core 3 (Raptor Lake-PS) |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | 233 mm² | Not recorded |

| Cores | 8 | 6 |

| Threads | 16 | 8 |

| Base clock | 2.00 | 1.20 |

| Boost clock | 5.00 | 4.50 |

| TDP | 28 | 15 |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 cache | 8 MB | 10 MB (shared) |

| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 880M | UHD Graphics 64EU |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release date | 2026-03-08 | 2024-04-07 |

| Average benchmark score | 52901 | 0 |

| Percentile standing | 91 | 50 |

Where Each One Wins

The recorded head-to-head win count is 0 for both processors because no paired benchmarks exist. In standalone benchmark categories, the AMD part is the only processor with entries, and those entries span data compression, data encryption, extended instructions, prime number finding, floating point math, integer math, multithread, physics, random string sorting, and single-thread performance. The largest AMD score is 327891 in data compression, followed by 87940 in integer math, 55799 in floating point math, 34801 in random string sorting, 25889 in multithread, 24193 in extended instructions, 16055 in data encryption, 4029 in single-thread, 1210 in physics, and 71 in prime number finding.

The Intel part has no score in any of these categories. The only field where the Intel part leads is TDP: 15 against the AMD part's 28. That is a power specification, not a benchmark win, so the use-case split from benchmark wins is entirely on the AMD side.