AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i vs Intel Core 9 273PTE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i and the Intel Core 9 273PTE. The Intel part has a full set of measured scores, while the AMD part has no recorded benchmark entries. This asymmetry means the quantitative comparison must rely entirely on the Intel processor's absolute scores, its percentile standing, and its nearest rival deltas, with the AMD chip assessed only through its specification profile.

The Intel Core 9 273PTE delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20445 and a single-core score of 2886. In Cinebench R20, it scores 8586 multi-core and 1212 single-core. The Cinebench R15 results show 2060 multi-core and 290 single-core. These numbers place the Intel processor at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 31143.

The Intel part's nearest rivals in the database are tightly clustered. The Intel Core i7-12700F scores 31081, a delta of 0.2 percent relative to the Core 9 273PTE. The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HS also sits at 31074, again a 0.2 percent delta. The Intel Core i7-13700TE records 31028, a 0.4 percent delta. Only the Intel Core i7-12650HX trails slightly, with a score of 31290 and a delta of negative 0.5 percent. These deltas are minuscule, indicating that the Core 9 273PTE performs within a narrow band of established mid-range and upper-mid-range processors.

PassMark results for the Intel chip show a multi-thread score of 24054 and a single-thread score of 3433. The data compression test yields 258704, while data encryption scores 14253. Extended instructions produce 15952, and find prime numbers returns 142. Floating point math scores 60673, and integer math scores 82411. Physics testing yields 1917, and random string sorting produces 28973.

Because the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i has no benchmark entries, the database cannot compute wins for either side. The head-to-head benchmark section is therefore necessarily one-sided: the Intel processor's measured performance stands alone, while the AMD chip's performance remains unquantified in this record.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 9 273PTE wins every category where data exists, simply because it is the only part with recorded measurements. Its multi-threaded workload performance is substantial, as shown by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20445 and the PassMark multi-thread score of 24054. Single-threaded performance is also strong, with 2886 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 3433 in PassMark single-thread.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i cannot claim any benchmark win in this database. Its only quantifiable attributes are its specifications: 6 cores, 12 threads, a 2.00 GHz base clock, a 4.50 GHz boost clock, a 28 watt TDP, and 4 MB of L3 cache. These specs suggest a lower power envelope and fewer physical cores than the Intel part, but without benchmark scores, any performance inference remains speculative.

For use-case analysis, the Intel part's data indicates strength in heavily threaded applications. The Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 8586 and the PassMark integer math score of 82411 point to productivity and compute-heavy scenarios. The data compression result of 258704 is particularly high, suggesting the processor handles compression workloads efficiently. The extended instructions score of 15952 and floating point math score of 60673 add further evidence of general-purpose computational capability.

The AMD chip, by contrast, targets a different segment. Its 28 watt TDP, mobile market segment designation, and integrated Radeon 840M graphics position it for embedded and mobile applications where power efficiency matters more than raw throughput. Its 6 cores and 12 threads, along with a 4.50 GHz boost clock, provide a plausible balance for lighter workloads, but the database contains no scores to confirm this.

FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core 9 273PTE's percentile ranking among all CPUs?

A: The Intel Core 9 273PTE sits at the 82nd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 31143.

Q: How does the Intel Core 9 273PTE compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-12700F?

A: The Intel Core i7-12700F has an average score of 31081, which is a 0.2 percent delta relative to the Core 9 273PTE, meaning the two perform nearly identically in the database's aggregate scoring.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i has an empty benchmark array in the database, with an average benchmark score of 0 and a 50th percentile ranking.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory. The Intel Core 9 273PTE supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory. Both use dual-channel memory buses with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Core 9 273PTE has a TDP of 45 watts.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i and the Intel Core 9 273PTE support ECC memory.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i and Intel Core 9 273PTE differ across nearly every core specification. The AMD chip has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel chip has 12 cores and 24 threads, doubling the thread count. Base clocks differ significantly: the AMD part runs at 2.00 GHz, while the Intel part runs at 1.40 GHz. Boost clocks reverse the order, with the AMD chip reaching 4.50 GHz and the Intel chip reaching 5.50 GHz.

TDP presents a clear separation. The AMD processor consumes 28 watts, while the Intel processor consumes 45 watts. This difference reflects their target markets: the AMD part is a mobile embedded chip, while the Intel part is a desktop chip.

Cache hierarchies diverge substantially. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache is 1 MB per core on the AMD chip and 2 MB per core on the Intel chip. The L3 cache differs even more: the AMD part has 4 MB total, while the Intel part has 36 MB shared. This gives the Intel processor nine times the L3 capacity.

Memory support differs in type. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth is identical at 89.6 GB/s for both, and both use dual-channel buses.

PCIe capabilities separate the two clearly. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i uses PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes from the CPU. The Intel Core 9 273PTE uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, offering both a newer generation and more lanes.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD chip includes a Radeon 840M, while the Intel chip includes UHD Graphics 730.

The sockets are incompatible: the AMD part uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700.

Process nodes also differ. The AMD processor is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel processor uses a 10 nm process at Intel. This gives the AMD chip a smaller process node despite its lower core count.

The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $549. The AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP in the database.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation, which the database identifies as Zen 5 / Zen 5c. The Intel Core 9 273PTE uses the Bartlett Lake codename and belongs to the Core 9 generation, identified simply as Bartlett Lake.

The manufacturing processes reflect different foundry strategies. AMD uses TSMC's 4 nm node, while Intel uses its own 10 nm node. This process gap likely contributes to the AMD chip's lower 28 watt TDP despite a higher base clock of 2.00 GHz versus Intel's 1.40 GHz.

Core architecture differs fundamentally. The AMD part's Zen 5 / Zen 5c designation implies a hybrid core arrangement, mixing full Zen 5 cores with compact Zen 5c cores. The Intel part's Bartlett Lake generation does not carry a comparable hybrid descriptor in the database, though its 24 threads across 12 cores indicate simultaneous multithreading across all cores.

Cache design highlights architectural divergence. The AMD chip allocates 1 MB of L2 per core and 4 MB of total L3, a modest pool suited to its embedded mobile role. The Intel chip allocates 2 MB of L2 per core and 36 MB of shared L3, a significantly larger cache hierarchy that supports its desktop workload ambitions.

PCIe generation separates the platforms. The AMD chip runs PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes, while the Intel chip runs PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. This affects expandability and peripheral bandwidth, with the Intel part offering newer connectivity.

Integrated graphics architectures differ. The AMD Radeon 840M represents a modern integrated GPU design, while the Intel UHD Graphics 730 is a more basic integrated solution. Neither has recorded graphics benchmarks in this database.

The AMD chip's memory support for LPDDR5X indicates a mobile-oriented architecture, while the Intel chip's support for DDR4 alongside DDR5 suggests broader compatibility with existing desktop platforms. Both support ECC memory, a feature common in embedded and workstation contexts.

The Intel part's part number is recorded as SA4QJ, and its production status is active. The AMD part's part number is listed as unknown, though its production status is also active. Both processors have a release date of 2026-03-08 in the database, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.