AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i vs Intel Core 7 350 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database currently contains no head-to-head benchmark results pairing the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i directly against the Intel Core 7 350. All recorded measurements for the Intel part appear in its benchmark profile, while the AMD part has no benchmark entries at all. This makes a direct score-for-score comparison impossible. What the data does provide is a complete picture of the Intel Core 7 350's performance profile and its position relative to other processors in the database.

The Intel Core 7 350's benchmark results span several test suites. In Cinebench R23, it records a multicore score of 8030 and a singlecore score of 2046. Cinebench R20 shows 5373 multicore and 758 singlecore. The older Cinebench R15 test produces 1220 multicore and 292 singlecore. PassMark results include a multithread score of 15170, a single thread score of 4100, integer math at 33734, floating point math at 42809, extended instructions at 12045, data compression at 143123, data encryption at 10933, find prime numbers at 107, random string sorting at 17238, and physics at 1173.

The average benchmark score for the Intel Core 7 350 is 17779, placing it in the 71st percentile of all CPUs in the database. The nearest rivals provide context for this figure. The Intel Core 5 221TE scores 17860, which is 0.5 percent higher. The AMD Ryzen 5 3600XT scores 17891, 0.6 percent higher. The Intel Core 5 120U scores 17898, 0.7 percent higher. The AMD EPYC 9374F scores 17693, which is 0.5 percent lower than the Core 7 350. These deltas are narrow, indicating the Core 7 350 sits in a tightly clustered performance band. The data suggests the Core 7 350 is essentially on par with these rivals, with no single competitor holding a decisive edge in aggregate score.

FAQ

Q: What is the Intel Core 7 350's average benchmark score and percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core 7 350 records an average benchmark score of 17779 and sits in the 71st percentile of all CPUs in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core 7 350 compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core 5 221TE?

A: The Intel Core 5 221TE has an average score of 17860, which is 0.5 percent higher than the Core 7 350's 17779. The difference is minimal.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The AMD part has an empty benchmark array, an average benchmark score of 0, and a percentile ranking of 50. No performance measurements are recorded for it.

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds for these two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i boosts to 4.50 GHz, while the Intel Core 7 350 boosts to 4.80 GHz.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core 7 350?

A: The launch MSRP is $469. No launch MSRP is listed for the AMD part.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 350 wins in every category where recorded data exists, simply because the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i has no benchmark entries. For the Intel part, the data shows strengths across both single-threaded and multi-threaded workloads. The single thread PassMark score of 4100 indicates strong per-core performance, a result consistent with its 4.80 GHz boost clock. The Cinebench R23 singlecore score of 2046 reinforces this picture.

In multithreaded tasks, the Intel part's 6 cores and 6 threads produce a PassMark multithread score of 15170 and a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 8030. The data shows the processor handles parallel workloads competently, though its thread count matches its core count with no hyperthreading. The Intel part also delivers strong results in specific computational tasks. PassMark floating point math at 42809 and integer math at 33734 show solid arithmetic throughput. Data compression at 143123 and data encryption at 10933 indicate capable performance in data-centric operations. Extended instructions at 12045 suggest the processor accelerates modern instruction sets effectively.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i, by contrast, has no recorded wins in any category. The database contains zero benchmark measurements for this processor, so no performance claims can be made from the data. The AMD part's 12 threads versus 6 threads suggest potential multithreading advantages on paper, but without recorded scores, the data cannot confirm any actual performance outcome.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several key specifications. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the Intel Core 7 350 has 6 cores and 6 threads. Base clocks differ: AMD runs at 2.00 GHz, Intel at 1.50 GHz. Boost clocks also differ: AMD reaches 4.50 GHz, Intel reaches 4.80 GHz. Thermal design power shows a gap: AMD is rated at 28 watts, Intel at 15 watts.

Memory support differs in bus configuration and bandwidth. Both processors support DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory. The AMD part uses a dual-channel memory bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel part uses a single-channel memory bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth. ECC memory support also differs: AMD supports it, Intel does not.

PCIe lanes vary significantly. The AMD processor provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only). The Intel processor provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes (CPU only). Socket types differ: AMD uses AMD Socket FP8, Intel uses Intel BGA 1516. Integrated graphics differ: AMD includes Radeon 840M, Intel includes Intel Xe3 Graphics (2 Xe).

Release dates are close but distinct. The AMD part has a release date of 2026-03-08, while the Intel part shows 2026-04-15. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $469; no MSRP is listed for the AMD part. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The production status for both is active.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core 7 350 uses the Wildcat Lake codename and belongs to the Core 5 generation based on Wildcat Lake cores. It is fabricated on a 3 nm process at Intel.

Cache layouts differ substantially. The AMD processor has an L1 cache of 80 KB per core, an L2 cache of 1 MB per core, and an L3 cache of 4 MB. The Intel processor has an L1 cache of 192 KB per core, an L2 cache of 2.5 MB per core, and an L3 cache of 6 MB shared. The Intel part therefore carries larger caches at every level, which can benefit workloads that reuse data frequently.

Market segments match: both are classified as mobile processors. The part numbers differ: AMD lists part number as unknown, Intel lists SAE3F. The Intel part's generation field reads "Core 5 (Wildcat Lake)" in the data, despite its Core 7 350 name, indicating the naming convention in the database groups it with the Core 5 series. The AMD generation field reads "Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)", reflecting its hybrid core design.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports only one clear conclusion: the Intel Core 7 350 has a complete, verifiable performance profile, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i has none. The Intel part's average benchmark score of 17779 and 71st percentile ranking place it among capable mobile processors. Its nearest rivals all score within 0.7 percent, showing the Core 7 350 delivers performance consistent with its peer group. The singlecore Cinebench R23 score of 2046 and PassMark single thread score of 4100 indicate strong per-core capability, useful for lightly threaded applications. The multicore Cinebench R23 score of 8030 and PassMark multithread score of 15170 show solid parallel throughput, even with only 6 threads.

The AMD part's specifications suggest theoretical advantages: 12 threads versus 6, dual-channel memory with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth versus single-channel 59.7 GB/s, 14 PCIe lanes versus 6, and ECC support. The higher 28 watt TDP also indicates more power headroom. But the database holds no measurements to confirm whether these specifications translate into actual performance gains. With zero benchmark scores and a 50th percentile ranking that reflects no data rather than measured performance, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i cannot be evaluated against the Intel Core 7 350 from the available records.

For any user selecting between these two processors, the data points to the Intel Core 7 350 as the only option with demonstrated performance. The AMD part remains unquantified in this database, and the recorded information provides no basis for recommending it over the Intel alternative. The Intel part's lower 15 watt TDP, higher 4.80 GHz boost clock, and larger cache hierarchy further support its position in the absence of AMD benchmark data. The verdict from the database is straightforward: the Intel Core 7 350 has the measured results to justify selection, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132i does not.