AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 vs Intel Xeon 6724P Comparison

AMD
AMD

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475

CORE STATE Gorgon Point
CORE SPECS 12 Cores / 24 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 2 Base / 5.2 GHz Turbo
CACHE 16 MB
MAX TDP 28W
ARCHITECTURE Zen 5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2026
VS
Intel
INTEL

Xeon 6724P

CORE STATE Granite Rapids
CORE SPECS 16 Cores / 32 Threads
CLOCK SPEED 3.6 Base / 4.3 GHz Turbo
CACHE 72 MB (shared)
MAX TDP 210W
ARCHITECTURE Granite Rapids
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

passmark_data_compression
461,650
627,185
passmark_data_encryption
23,132
34,332
passmark_extended_instructions
31,969
54,101
passmark_find_prime_numbers
130
372
passmark_floating_point_math
79,887
135,404
passmark_integer_math
126,829
172,216
passmark_multithread
36,487
51,345
passmark_physics
1,877
5,004
passmark_random_string_sorting
48,894
68,477
passmark_single_thread
4,301
3,279
passmark_singlethread
4,301
3,279
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore
N/A
4,399
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore
N/A
620
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore
N/A
18,330
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore
N/A
2,587
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore
N/A
43,643
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore
N/A
6,161

Analysis: AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 vs Intel Xeon 6724P

The Intel Xeon 6724P and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 are fundamentally different processors targeting opposite ends of the computing spectrum, and the benchmark data reflects this stark divide. The Xeon 6724P wins 9 of 11 head-to-head comparisons, often by massive margins in multi-threaded and server-oriented workloads, while the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 claims victory in single-thread performance with a 23.8% advantage. Despite the Xeon's dominance in raw throughput, both processors sit at the 94th percentile against all CPUs, indicating that the mobile AMD part is remarkably competitive in its own right.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Xeon 6724P's most decisive victory comes in PassMark's find prime numbers test, where it scores 372 against the AMD's 130, a 186.2% advantage. This workload heavily favors the Xeon's 16 cores and 32 threads over the AMD's 12 cores and 24 threads. Similarly, the physics test shows a 166.6% gap, with the Xeon scoring 5004 versus 1877 for the AMD part. These two tests alone demonstrate the Xeon's superiority in heavily parallel, compute-intensive tasks.

The Xeon also dominates in floating-point math, scoring 135404 against 79887, a 69.5% lead. Extended instructions show a 69.2% advantage (54101 vs 31969), indicating the Xeon's superior SIMD and vector processing capabilities. Data encryption results are closer but still favor the Xeon by 48.4% (34332 vs 23132), while data compression shows a 35.9% edge (627185 vs 461650). The multithread benchmark gives the Xeon a 40.7% win (51345 vs 36487), and random string sorting goes to Intel by 40.1% (68477 vs 48894). Even integer math, typically a more balanced test, shows a 35.8% Xeon advantage (172216 vs 126829).

However, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 wins the single-thread benchmark decisively, scoring 4301 against the Xeon's 3279, a 23.8% improvement. This is the only category where AMD leads, and it is a significant one. The Xeon's single-thread score of 3279 places it well behind, despite its high boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The AMD part's 5.20 GHz boost clock clearly translates to superior per-core performance. With 9 wins for Intel and 2 for AMD (counting the duplicate singlethread test), the overall picture is clear: the Xeon is a multi-core powerhouse, while the AMD excels at single-thread responsiveness.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on entirely different architectures and manufacturing processes. The Intel Xeon 6724P uses Granite Rapids architecture on a 5 nm process node fabricated by Intel, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 uses Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm process node from TSMC. The Intel part has a die size not listed in the data, while AMD specifies a 233 mm² die.

Core counts differ substantially: the Xeon has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the AMD has 12 cores and 24 threads. Cache configurations are also distinct. The Xeon features 112 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 72 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD part has 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. This gives the Xeon a massive 4.5x advantage in L3 cache, which contributes to its strong multi-threaded performance.

Memory support reveals the server versus mobile divide. The Xeon supports DDR5 with an eight-channel memory bus and 409.6 GB/s bandwidth, while the AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Xeon's memory bandwidth is 4.6x higher, a critical factor in server workloads. Both support ECC memory, but the Xeon's PCIe implementation is Gen 5 with 88 lanes (CPU only), while the AMD offers Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The AMD integrates Radeon 890M graphics, while the Xeon has no integrated graphics.

Clock speeds tell another story: the Xeon has a base clock of 3.60 GHz and boost of 4.30 GHz, while the AMD has a much lower 2.00 GHz base but a much higher 5.20 GHz boost. The TDP difference is enormous at 210W for the Xeon versus 28W for the AMD, reflecting their different market positions. The Xeon uses Intel Socket 4710, while the AMD uses AMD Socket FP8. The Xeon's release date is 2025-02-23, with the AMD following on 2026-01-04.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Xeon 6724P is the clear winner for server and workstation workloads that demand maximum parallel processing. Its 186.2% advantage in prime number finding and 166.6% lead in physics simulations make it ideal for scientific computing, financial modeling, and any application that can utilize all 32 threads. The 69.5% floating-point advantage suggests strong performance in engineering simulations and 3D rendering. The 48.4% encryption lead makes it suitable for database encryption, secure communications, and other cryptographic workloads. The 35.9% compression advantage benefits data warehousing and file server applications. With 88 PCIe Gen 5 lanes and 409.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, it can drive massive I/O configurations and large memory pools.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 wins where single-thread performance matters most. Its 23.8% single-thread advantage translates to snappier application launches, faster spreadsheet recalculations, and more responsive general desktop use. The 5.20 GHz boost clock and 4 nm Zen 5 architecture make it suitable for mobile workstations and laptops where battery life and portability are priorities, given its 28W TDP. While it loses every multi-threaded benchmark, its 94th percentile ranking shows it is still a capable performer for most everyday tasks. The integrated Radeon 890M graphics mean it can handle light graphics work without a discrete GPU, which the Xeon cannot do.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has higher single-thread performance?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 scores 4301 in PassMark single-thread tests, which is 23.8% higher than the Intel Xeon 6724P's 3279 score.

Q: How much faster is the Intel Xeon 6724P in multi-threaded workloads?

A: The Xeon scores 51345 in PassMark multithread tests, a 40.7% advantage over the AMD's 36487. In physics simulations, the Xeon leads by 166.6% (5004 vs 1877).

Q: What is the core and thread configuration of each processor?

A: The Intel Xeon 6724P has 16 cores and 32 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 has 12 cores and 24 threads.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Intel Xeon 6724P and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 support ECC memory, though the Xeon uses an eight-channel DDR5 configuration while the AMD uses dual-channel DDR5 or LPDDR5X.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: Only the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 has integrated graphics (Radeon 890M). The Intel Xeon 6724P has no integrated graphics.

Q: How do their average benchmark scores compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 has a slightly higher average benchmark score of 74496 compared to the Intel Xeon 6724P's 72396, despite losing most head-to-head tests.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Xeon 6724P | AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 16 | 12 |

| Threads | 32 | 24 |

| Base Clock | 3.60 GHz | 2.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.30 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 210 W | 28 W |

| Socket | Intel Socket 4710 | AMD Socket FP8 |

| Architecture | Granite Rapids | Zen 5 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |

| Foundry | Intel | TSMC |

| L1 Cache | 112 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 72 MB (shared) | 16 MB |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bus | Eight-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 409.6 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| PCIe | Gen 5, 88 Lanes | Gen 4, 16 Lanes |

| Integrated Graphics | N/A | Radeon 890M |

| Market Segment | Server/Workstation | Mobile |

| Release Date | 2025-02-23 | 2026-01-04 |

| Part Number | SRVUA | 100-000001683 |

The Verdict

The data dictates a clear split. Choose the Intel Xeon 6724P if your workloads are multi-threaded and parallel. Its 186.2% lead in prime number finding, 166.6% lead in physics, and 69.5% lead in floating-point math make it the obvious choice for servers, scientific computing, and heavy workstation tasks. The 72 MB of L3 cache, eight-channel memory with 409.6 GB/s bandwidth, and 88 PCIe Gen 5 lanes provide the infrastructure for demanding enterprise applications. Its 94th percentile ranking against all CPUs, with nearest rivals like the Intel Xeon 6517P within 0.1% and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF within 0.7%, confirms its position among top-tier processors.

Choose the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 if single-thread performance and mobility are priorities. Its 23.8% single-thread advantage over the Xeon, combined with a 28W TDP, makes it suitable for laptops and mobile workstations. Despite its lower core count, it achieves a higher average benchmark score of 74496 versus the Xeon's 72396, and its nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X and AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9745, both within 0.4%. The integrated Radeon 890M graphics add versatility. The Xeon 6724P has a launch MSRP of $3622, reflecting its enterprise positioning. For raw multi-core power, the Xeon is unmatched. For per-core efficiency and portability, the AMD part wins.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
AI 9 HX PRO 475
6724P
Core Specs
Cores
12
16 +33.3%
Threads
24
32 +33.3%
Base Clock (GHz)
2
3.6 +80.0%
Boost Clock (GHz)
5.2
4.3 -17.3%
Frequency (GHz)
2
3.6 +80.0%
Turbo Clock (GHz)
5.2
4.3 -17.3%
Multiplier
20
36 +80.0%
SMP CPUs
1
8 +700.0%
Cache
L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
112 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
2 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
16 MB
72 MB (shared)
Power
TDP (W)
28
210 +650.0%
Configurable TDP
15-54 W
—
Architecture
Architecture
Zen 5
Granite Rapids
Codename
Gorgon Point
Granite Rapids
Generation
Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c)
Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids-SP)
Process Size
4 nm
5 nm
Die Size
233 mm²
—
Foundry
TSMC
Intel
Memory
Memory Support
DDR5, LPDDR5X
DDR5
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Eight-channel
Memory Bandwidth
89.6 GB/s
409.6 GB/s
ECC Memory
Yes
Yes
Platform
Socket
AMD Socket FP8
Intel Socket 4710
PCIe
Gen 4, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Gen 5, 88 Lanes(CPU only)
Intel Hybrid
Hybrid Cores
4 + 8
—
E-Core Frequency
2000 MHz up to 3.3 GHz
—
AMD Multi-Die
IO Process Size
—
10 nm
Interconnect
UPI Links
—
3 x24 24 GT/s
CXL
—
Gen 2.0, 64 Lanes (Shared with PCI-E)
AI/NPU
NPU
Yes / 60 TOPS
—
Graphics
Integrated Graphics
Radeon 890M
—
Other
Market
Mobile
Server/Workstation
Production Status
Active
Active
Launch Price
—
$3622
Part Number
100-000001683
SRVUA
Package
FP8
FC-LGA18N
Tj Max
100°C
103°C
Bundled Cooler
—
None
View Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 Details View Xeon 6724P Details