AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 vs Intel Processor U302L Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 vs Intel Processor U302L: A Study in Contrasts

The database contains two mobile processors with vastly different design goals. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 is a high-core-count, high-frequency part aimed at demanding workloads, while the Intel Processor U302L is a low-power, efficiency-focused chip. Benchmark data shows the AMD part scoring in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, whereas the Intel part sits at the 50th percentile. The record includes a complete set of AMD benchmarks, but the Intel Processor U302L has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This analysis relies on the architectural and specification data to frame the comparison.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 is the clear winner in multi-threaded throughput. With 12 cores and 24 threads, it handles parallel workloads with far more resources than the Intel Processor U302L, which has only 5 cores and 6 threads. The AMD part's recorded PassMark multi-thread score of 36,487 reflects this capacity. Single-thread performance also favors AMD, as its boost clock of 5.20 GHz far exceeds the Intel part's 2.40 GHz boost. The AMD chip's score of 4,301 in single-thread tests indicates strong per-core speed, which is useful for lightly threaded applications like web browsing or office work.

The Intel Processor U302L wins in power efficiency. Its TDP of 15 watts is significantly lower than the AMD part's 28 watts. This makes the Intel chip more suitable for fanless or ultra-thin designs where heat dissipation is limited. The Intel part also supports DDR4 memory, which can be cheaper and more widely available in legacy systems, while the AMD part requires DDR5 or LPDDR5X. For basic tasks like document editing or video playback, the Intel chip's lower power draw is an advantage, though the database lacks direct performance measurements to quantify how much work it can complete per watt.

Architecture Differences

The two chips come from different foundries and use different process nodes. AMD uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while Intel uses a 10 nm process from its own fabs. The AMD part is built on the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Gorgon Point, part of the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation. The Intel part uses the older Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-PS. These architectural differences explain the performance gap: Zen 5 is a newer design with higher instructions per clock, and the smaller 4 nm node allows for more transistors in the same die area.

The AMD chip's die size is recorded as 233 mm², while the Intel part has no die size listed. Cache configurations also differ. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but the AMD part has 1 MB of L2 per core and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 10 MB of shared L3. The AMD chip's larger L3 cache helps with frequently accessed data, reducing memory latency. The Intel part's slightly larger L2 per core may help with some workloads, but the overall cache hierarchy favors AMD.

Memory support diverges as well. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, but no bandwidth figure is recorded. The AMD part also supports ECC memory, which is a feature for data integrity in server-like workloads. The Intel part does not support ECC. The AMD chip's integrated graphics is the Radeon 890M, while the Intel chip uses UHD Graphics 80EU. The AMD part's PCIe support is Gen 4 with 16 lanes, while the Intel part has Gen 4 with only 8 lanes, limiting expansion options.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database does not contain direct head-to-head benchmark results for these two processors. The `headToHeadBenchmarks` field is empty, and the win counters for both parts are zero. This means a direct comparison of specific test scores is not possible from the recorded data. However, the AMD part has a full set of PassMark scores, and its average benchmark score is 74,496. The Intel part has an average score of zero and no individual test results.

Looking at the AMD part's scores provides context for its performance tier. Its floating point math score is 79,887, and its integer math score is 126,829. The data compression score is 461,650, and the data encryption score is 23,132. The extended instructions score is 31,969, and the find prime numbers score is 130. The random string sorting score is 48,894, and the physics score is 1,877. These numbers show a processor that excels at mathematical and compression tasks, but the lack of Intel scores prevents a direct delta calculation.

The AMD part's nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X with an average score of 74,640 and a delta of -0.2 percent, meaning the Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 is slightly behind it. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9745 scores 74,761, a -0.4 percent delta. The AMD EPYC 4545P scores 75,373, a -1.2 percent delta. The Intel Core Ultra 9 285 scores 75,488, a -1.3 percent delta. These are all desktop or server-class parts, which puts the AMD mobile chip in a strong position. The Intel Processor U302L has no such rival data, so its standing is based solely on its 50th percentile ranking.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every core specification. The AMD part has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel part has 5 cores and 6 threads. The AMD base clock is 2.00 GHz, and the boost clock is 5.20 GHz. The Intel base clock is 1.20 GHz, and the boost clock is 2.40 GHz. The TDP is 28 watts for AMD and 15 watts for Intel. The AMD socket is AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel socket is Intel Socket 1700. The AMD process node is 4 nm from TSMC, while the Intel node is 10 nm from Intel.

The L3 cache is 16 MB for AMD and 10 MB for Intel. The L2 cache per core is 1 MB for AMD and 1.25 MB for Intel. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel value is not recorded. ECC memory support is present on AMD and absent on Intel. PCIe lanes are 16 for AMD and 8 for Intel, both Gen 4. Integrated graphics are Radeon 890M for AMD and UHD Graphics 80EU for Intel. The AMD release date is January 2026, and the Intel release date is April 2024. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $285, while the AMD part has no recorded launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Processor U302L has 5 cores and 6 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?

A: The AMD part boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the Intel part boosts to 2.40 GHz. The AMD chip has a 2.80 GHz higher boost clock.

Q: Does the Intel Processor U302L support ECC memory?

A: No, ECC memory is not supported on the Intel part. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 does support ECC memory.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD part has a TDP of 28 watts, and the Intel part has a TDP of 15 watts. The Intel chip draws less power.

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD part has an average benchmark score of 74,496, and the Intel part has an average score of 0 in the database.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear split. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 is for users who need raw performance. Its 12 cores, 24 threads, and 5.20 GHz boost clock place it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. The recorded benchmark scores for math, compression, and encryption tasks show a processor capable of heavy parallel work. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and ECC support make it suitable for professional applications where data integrity matters. The 28 watt TDP means it requires more cooling, but the performance return is substantial.

The Intel Processor U302L is for users who prioritize low power consumption. Its 15 watt TDP allows for compact, efficient systems. The 5 cores and 6 threads are enough for basic productivity, and the support for DDR4 memory provides flexibility with older components. The 50th percentile ranking indicates it is an average performer, but the lack of benchmark scores in the database means its real-world capabilities are not fully quantified. The launch MSRP of $285 positions it as a low-cost option, though the database does not include pricing details for the AMD part.

For a user choosing between these two, the decision hinges on the workload. Heavy multitasking, content creation, or data processing favors the AMD chip. Light office work, web browsing, or fanless designs favor the Intel chip. The AMD part's release date of January 2026 is newer than the Intel part's April 2024 release, so the AMD chip benefits from a more recent design. The Intel part's 10 nm node and older Raptor Lake architecture cannot match the Zen 5 performance, but the lower TDP is a genuine advantage in power-constrained scenarios.