AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 vs Intel Processor N150 Comparison

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 and the Intel Processor N150 occupy completely different tiers of the mobile processor market. The AMD part is a 12-core, 24-thread Zen 5-based flagship, while the Intel N150 is a 4-core, 4-thread Twin Lake part aimed at low-power systems. The benchmark data in the database confirms this gap, with the AMD processor scoring an average of 74,496 across its recorded tests, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. The Intel N150, by contrast, averages 1,025 points, sitting in the 28th percentile. The delta between the two is substantial, and the recorded measurements show a clear winner in every workload category.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 delivers its most dominant performance in multi-threaded and compute-intensive tasks. Its Passmark multi-thread score is 36,487, a figure that reflects the combined output of 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel N150 does not have a comparable Passmark multi-thread score in the database; its recorded benchmarks are Cinebench R15 and R23 tests. In Cinebench R23 multi-core, the Intel N150 scores 2,590.5 points. The AMD processor does not have a Cinebench R23 score in the database, so a direct comparison on that specific test is not possible. However, the Passmark data shows the AMD part’s integer math score is 126,829, floating point math is 79,887, and extended instructions score is 31,969. These figures demonstrate a very high throughput for arithmetic and SIMD workloads.

The single-thread results also favor the AMD processor, though the gap is smaller in relative terms. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 records a Passmark single-thread score of 4,301. The Intel N150 achieves a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 935 and a Cinebench R15 single-core score of 153.15. Since the two CPUs were tested with different benchmark suites, a direct numerical comparison is only possible through the average benchmark scores. The AMD part’s average score of 74,496 is roughly 73 times higher than the Intel N150’s average of 1,025. This ratio reflects the massive difference in compute resources and clock capabilities.

In terms of nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 sits just below the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X (average score 74,640, delta -0.2%), the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9745 (average 74,761, delta -0.4%), and the AMD EPYC 4545P (average 75,373, delta -1.2%). It also trails the Intel Core Ultra 9 285 (average 75,488, delta -1.3%) by a narrow margin. These deltas show that the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 is within 1.3% of some of the fastest desktop-class processors in the database, despite being a mobile part with a 28-watt TDP.

The Intel N150’s nearest rivals are all much older or lower-end processors. It matches the AMD Phenom II X6 1075T (average 1,024, delta 0.1%), the Intel Core i3-4340 (average 1,026, delta -0.1%), the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U (average 1,024, delta 0.1%), and the Intel Core i7-5650U (average 1,027, delta -0.2%). These deltas are all within 0.2%, meaning the Intel N150 delivers performance equivalent to a six-core Phenom II from the early 2010s or a dual-core Core i7 from the 2015 era.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 wins in every workload category where data exists. Its Passmark data compression score is 461,650, data encryption is 23,132, find prime numbers is 130, random string sorting is 48,894, and physics is 1,877. The Intel N150 has no Passmark scores recorded, so these tests are strictly AMD territory. The AMD part also shows strength in sustained multi-threaded loads, as indicated by its multithread score of 36,487 and its 24 threads. For software that can use many cores, such as video encoding, 3D rendering, or scientific computation, the AMD processor has a decisive advantage.

The Intel N150’s wins are limited to the specific Cinebench tests it was measured on, and even there, the absolute scores are low. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 2,590.5 and single-core score of 935 are far below what a modern 12-core processor would produce, but the AMD part was not tested with Cinebench, so the Intel N150 is the only one of the two with recorded Cinebench results. In a direct head-to-head on that suite, the Intel N150 would be the only data point, but the average benchmark scores make the overall performance hierarchy unambiguous.

The Intel N150’s advantage lies in power consumption and simplicity. Its TDP is 6 watts, compared to 28 watts for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475. The Intel part also uses a single-channel memory bus, which is simpler and cheaper to implement. Its integrated graphics, UHD Graphics 730, is paired with a low-power design. For fanless mini PCs, thin clients, or basic embedded systems, the Intel N150’s low power draw is a practical benefit, but that is not reflected in the benchmark scores themselves.

The Verdict

The data supports a straightforward conclusion: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 is a far more powerful processor. Its average benchmark score of 74,496 places it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel N150’s 1,025 average places it in the 28th percentile. The AMD part delivers 12 cores and 24 threads, a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel N150 has 4 cores and 4 threads, a boost clock of 3.60 GHz, and 6 MB of L3 cache. The architectural differences are stark, and the recorded performance numbers reflect those differences.

For workloads that are multi-threaded or require high single-thread responsiveness, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 is the only viable choice between the two. Its nearest rivals in the database are top-tier desktop processors like the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285, with deltas under 1.3%. That level of performance is exceptional for a mobile chip. The Intel N150, on the other hand, matches the performance of decade-old desktop processors, as shown by its near-identical average scores to the AMD Phenom II X6 1075T and the Intel Core i7-5650U.

The Intel N150 is only suitable for scenarios where the 6-watt TDP and low-cost platform are the primary requirements. Its benchmark results do not indicate any workload where it outperforms the AMD part. The AMD processor’s 28-watt TDP is higher, but it also enables a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz, versus the Intel part’s base clock of 0.10 GHz and boost of 3.60 GHz. The base clock difference alone explains much of the performance gap in single-threaded tasks.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 has an average benchmark score of 74,496, while the Intel Processor N150 has an average of 1,025. The AMD part scores approximately 73 times higher.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 is 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X, 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9745, 1.2% behind the AMD EPYC 4545P, and 1.3% behind the Intel Core Ultra 9 285.

Q: What are the nearest rivals of the Intel Processor N150?

A: The Intel Processor N150 is within 0.2% of the AMD Phenom II X6 1075T, the Intel Core i3-4340, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U, and the Intel Core i7-5650U, based on average scores.

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Processor N150 has 4 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 has a TDP of 28 watts. The Intel Processor N150 has a TDP of 6 watts.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor N150 does not support ECC memory.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 is built on the Zen 5 architecture with a codename of Gorgon Point and belongs to the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It uses a 4 nm process node fabricated by TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The processor is based on 12 cores and 24 threads, with an L1 cache of 80 KB per core and an L2 cache of 1 MB per core. The L3 cache is 16 MB.

The Intel Processor N150 uses the Twin Lake architecture, also known as Twin Lake, and is part of the Intel Processor generation based on Alder Lake-N. It uses a 10 nm process node fabricated by Intel. The die size is not recorded in the database. The Intel part has 4 cores and 4 threads, with an L1 cache of 96 KB per core and an L2 cache of 2 MB shared. The L3 cache is 6 MB shared.

The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 memory over a single-channel bus, with a memory bandwidth of 38.4 GB/s. The AMD part also supports ECC memory, while the Intel part does not. PCIe support differs as well: the AMD processor uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor uses Gen 3 with 9 lanes (CPU only).

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every recorded specification field. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Processor N150 has 4 cores and 4 threads. The base clock for the AMD part is 2.00 GHz, compared to 0.10 GHz for the Intel part. The boost clock is 5.20 GHz for AMD and 3.60 GHz for Intel. The TDP is 28 watts for AMD and 6 watts for Intel.

The socket differs: AMD uses AMD Socket FP8, while Intel uses Intel BGA 1264. The process node is 4 nm for AMD and 10 nm for Intel. The L1 cache is 80 KB per core for AMD and 96 KB per core for Intel. The L2 cache is 1 MB per core for AMD and 2 MB shared for Intel. The L3 cache is 16 MB for AMD and 6 MB shared for Intel. Memory support is DDR5 and LPDDR5X for AMD, versus DDR4, DDR5, and LPDDR5 for Intel. The memory bus is dual-channel for AMD and single-channel for Intel. Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for AMD and 38.4 GB/s for Intel. ECC memory support is present on AMD and absent on Intel. PCIe is Gen 4 with 16 lanes on AMD and Gen 3 with 9 lanes on Intel. Integrated graphics are Radeon 890M on AMD and UHD Graphics 730 on Intel. The release date is 2026-01-04 for AMD and 2024-11-19 for Intel. The part numbers are 100-000001683 for AMD and SRPNR for Intel. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.