AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 vs Intel Processor 300 Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 vs Intel Processor 300

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data shows a decisive performance gap between these two processors, though direct head-to-head measurements are not recorded in the database. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 delivers a multi-threaded score of 36,487 in the PassMark multithread test, while the Intel Processor 300 has no recorded benchmark results in any database category. In single-thread performance, the AMD part scores 4,301, a figure that places it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs tracked. The Intel Processor 300 sits in the 50th percentile, with an average benchmark score of zero, meaning no performance data has been captured for it.

The AMD processor's average benchmark score of 74,496 places it within 0.2% of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X, which scores 74,640, and within 0.4% of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9745 at 74,761. The Intel Processor 300 has no nearest rivals listed, no benchmark scores, and no wins recorded. The database records zero wins for the Intel part, while the AMD part also shows zero direct wins, reflecting the absence of head-to-head test data rather than a lack of competitive strength.

Looking at specific workload results for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475, the integer math test produces a score of 126,829, while floating-point math reaches 79,887. Data compression scores 461,650, data encryption scores 23,132, and extended instruction sets score 31,969. Random string sorting hits 48,894, and the physics test yields 1,877. Prime number finding scores 130. These results collectively support the 94th percentile ranking.

The Intel Processor 300's lack of recorded benchmarks means the database cannot compute any comparative deltas between the two chips. The AMD part's nearest rivals all score within 1.3% of its average, showing it competes at the level of high-end desktop and workstation processors, not entry-level dual-core parts.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 wins in every category where data exists. It uses 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Processor 300 uses 2 cores and 4 threads. The AMD part boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the Intel part has no boost clock listed, only a base clock of 3.90 GHz. In memory bandwidth, the AMD processor supports 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel processor has no memory bandwidth figure recorded.

The AMD chip is a mobile processor, while the Intel chip is a desktop processor. The AMD part features ECC memory support, while the Intel part does not. The AMD processor uses an integrated Radeon 890M graphics solution, while the Intel processor uses UHD Graphics 710. The AMD chip supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes, while the Intel chip supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

For users running multi-threaded workloads, the AMD processor's 24 threads versus the Intel processor's 4 threads represents a 6x thread count advantage. The AMD part's 16 MB of L3 cache versus the Intel part's 6 MB shared L3 cache further favors the AMD chip in cache-sensitive tasks. The AMD processor's 4 nm process node versus Intel's 10 nm node indicates a more advanced manufacturing process.

The Intel Processor 300 does hold advantages in specific areas. It has a higher base clock at 3.90 GHz versus 2.00 GHz, and it supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD part supports only DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel chip also supports PCIe Gen 5, a newer standard than the AMD chip's Gen 4. The Intel processor has a 163 mm² die size versus the AMD's 233 mm², making it physically smaller.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Gorgon Point codename, part of the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Processor 300 uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-S codename, built on a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD chip has a die size of 233 mm², while the Intel chip measures 163 mm².

Cache configurations differ substantially. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 cache per core, while the Intel part has 1.25 MB per core. The AMD processor has 16 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel processor has 6 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD chip's L3 cache is over 2.6 times larger than the Intel chip's.

Memory support diverges. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory through a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory through a dual-channel bus, though its bandwidth is not recorded in the database. The AMD part supports ECC memory, while the Intel part does not.

The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD processor's part number is 100-000001683, and it was released on January 4, 2026. The Intel processor's part number is SRN3J, and it was released on January 7, 2024. Both processors are currently active in production, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part's TDP is 28 watts, while the Intel part's TDP is 46 watts, making the AMD chip more power-efficient on paper. The Intel Processor 300 has a launch MSRP of $82.

The AMD processor integrates Radeon 890M graphics, while the Intel processor integrates UHD Graphics 710. The AMD chip targets the mobile market segment, while the Intel chip targets the desktop segment.

The Verdict

The recorded data indicates the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 is the substantially stronger processor. Its average benchmark score of 74,496 places it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Processor 300 has no recorded average score and sits in the 50th percentile. The AMD chip's 12 cores and 24 threads dwarf the Intel chip's 2 cores and 4 threads. Its 16 MB of L3 cache, 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, and 5.20 GHz boost clock all exceed the Intel part's recorded specifications.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 belongs in a performance tier near the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X, the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 9745, and the AMD EPYC 4545P, all of which score within 1.3% of its average. This is a high-end mobile processor competing with flagship desktop and workstation chips. The Intel Processor 300 is a low-end desktop part with no recorded performance data, making it impossible to quantify its capabilities relative to the AMD chip.

The Intel Processor 300 does offer a higher base clock, DDR4 compatibility, and PCIe Gen 5 support. These features may matter for specific desktop builds, but they do not compensate for the core count, cache size, and memory bandwidth gaps. The database shows no benchmark results for the Intel part, so any performance claims about it cannot be verified against the same test suite.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Processor 300 has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What are the average benchmark scores for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 has an average benchmark score of 74,496. The Intel Processor 300 has an average benchmark score of 0, with no recorded benchmark results.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 supports ECC memory. The Intel Processor 300 does not support ECC memory.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel Processor 300 supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: Which processor has the larger L3 cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 has 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel Processor 300 has 6 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What are the market segments for these processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 is a mobile processor. The Intel Processor 300 is a desktop processor.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 | Intel Processor 300 |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 12 | 2 |

| Threads | 24 | 4 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 3.90 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | None |

| TDP | 28 W | 46 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-S |

| Generation | Ryzen AI PRO 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | 163 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 6 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | None |

| ECC Memory | Yes | No |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 890M | UHD Graphics 710 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release Date | January 4, 2026 | January 7, 2024 |

| Launch MSRP | None | $82 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

| Part Number | 100-000001683 | SRN3J |

| Percentile vs All CPUs | 94 | 50 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 74,496 | 0 |