AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 vs Intel Core i7-14700KF Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive sweep: the Intel Core i7-14700KF wins all 11 head-to-head benchmark comparisons against the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475. The largest margin comes in floating point math, where Intel scores 134393 versus AMD's 79887, a 40.6% advantage. Integer math follows at 30.7% ahead (183056 vs. 126829), and prime number finding shows a 38.7% gap (212 vs. 130). These are not marginal differences; they represent a substantial performance class separation in compute-heavy workloads.

Data encryption is another major win for Intel, posting 40046 against AMD's 23132, a 42.2% delta. This is the single largest percentage gap in the entire comparison. Random string sorting also favors Intel heavily, 74723 vs. 48894, a 34.6% difference. The multithread score, often considered a holistic throughput metric, shows Intel at 52425 versus AMD's 36487, a 30.4% lead. Physics simulation, another heavily threaded workload, sees Intel at 2961 versus AMD's 1877, a 36.6% gap.

The closest contest is single-thread performance. Intel scores 4480 versus AMD's 4301, a 4% delta. While Intel still wins, this narrow margin indicates that the AMD part's Zen 5 architecture is competitive on a per-thread basis, even if it cannot match Intel's overall throughput. Extended instructions show a 21.4% gap (40660 vs. 31969), and data compression shows a 33.6% gap (694963 vs. 461650).

The average benchmark scores reinforce this hierarchy. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 posts an average score of 74496, while the Intel Core i7-14700KF averages 70163. Interestingly, the AMD part's average is pulled up by its strong single-thread results and other non-PassMark metrics in the database, but the direct head-to-head PassMark tests all favor Intel. The AMD chip's percentile ranking is 94, identical to Intel's 94, meaning both sit in the same tier relative to all CPUs, but the head-to-head deltas show Intel is consistently faster in every measured test.

FAQ

Q: Which CPU wins in single-thread performance?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700KF wins in both single-thread tests, scoring 4480 versus AMD's 4301, a 4% advantage. This is the narrowest win for Intel across all benchmarks.

Q: How large is the gap in multithreaded performance?

A: Intel leads by 30.4% in the PassMark multithread test, scoring 52425 compared to AMD's 36487. The physics test shows an even larger 36.6% gap in Intel's favor.

Q: Which CPU has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700KF has 20 cores and 28 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 has 12 cores and 24 threads. Intel also has a higher boost clock at 5.60 GHz versus 5.20 GHz.

Q: Do both CPUs support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 and the Intel Core i7-14700KF support ECC memory. However, they differ in memory types: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: What is the difference in average benchmark scores?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 has a higher average benchmark score of 74496, while the Intel Core i7-14700KF averages 70163. This is notable because Intel wins every direct head-to-head test, indicating the AMD average is buoyed by other database measurements.

Q: Which CPU has a higher process node advantage?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 is built on a 4 nm TSMC process, while the Intel Core i7-14700KF uses Intel's 10 nm process. The AMD part also has a smaller die size at 233 mm² versus Intel's 257 mm².

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous for raw performance: the Intel Core i7-14700KF is faster in every single benchmark category measured. With 11 wins out of 11 head-to-head tests, it delivers between 4% and 42.2% higher scores depending on the workload. Anyone prioritizing maximum compute throughput, particularly in encryption, floating point, or multithreaded tasks, should select the Intel part based on these results.

However, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 is not without merit. Its average benchmark score (74496) exceeds Intel's (70163), and it matches Intel's 94th percentile ranking among all CPUs. The AMD chip's single-thread performance trails by only 4%, making it nearly competitive in lightly threaded applications. Additionally, the AMD part is a mobile processor with a 28 W TDP, while Intel is a desktop chip with a 125 W TDP. The database does not include power efficiency metrics, but the TDP figures alone suggest AMD's design targets a very different use case.

For desktop enthusiasts building a high-throughput workstation, the Intel Core i7-14700KF is the clear choice. For mobile platforms where the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 475 fits the socket and power envelope, it offers competitive single-thread capability and a strong average score, despite losing every direct benchmark comparison. The decision hinges on platform and power constraints rather than performance headroom, since Intel holds that in every measured test.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every core specification. The Intel Core i7-14700KF has 20 cores and 28 threads, compared to AMD's 12 cores and 24 threads. Intel's base clock is 3.40 GHz versus AMD's 2.00 GHz, and Intel's boost clock reaches 5.60 GHz versus AMD's 5.20 GHz. Thermal design power differs dramatically: Intel is rated at 125 W, AMD at 28 W.

Cache configurations also diverge. Both have 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but Intel has 2 MB of L2 per core versus AMD's 1 MB. L3 cache is 33 MB shared on Intel, while AMD has 16 MB total. Memory support sees Intel offering DDR4 and DDR5, while AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Intel's PCIe interface is Gen 5 with 16 lanes, while AMD uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes.

The AMD part includes integrated Radeon 890M graphics, while Intel lists no integrated graphics. Intel's multiplier is unlocked, AMD's is not. The socket differs completely: AMD uses Socket FP8, Intel uses Socket 1700. Intel's launch MSRP is $384; AMD's is not listed. Release dates also differ, with Intel released in 2023 and AMD in 2026.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split is fundamental. AMD uses Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, with the codename Gorgon Point and a die size of 233 mm². Intel uses Raptor Lake architecture (specifically Raptor Lake-R) on a 10 nm Intel process, with a die size of 257 mm². The foundries are different: TSMC for AMD, Intel for Intel.

AMD's generation is Ryzen AI PRO 400, combining Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. Intel's generation is Core i7, Raptor Lake Refresh. The memory bus is dual-channel for both, but AMD lists a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s while Intel does not list this figure. Both support ECC memory.

AMD's integrated Radeon 890M graphics is a significant architectural feature absent from Intel. Intel's unlocked multiplier allows overclocking, while AMD's locked multiplier does not. The process node difference (4 nm vs. 10 nm) gives AMD a density and efficiency advantage on paper, though the benchmark data shows Intel still wins on raw performance.

Where Each One Wins

Intel wins in every direct workload category: data compression, data encryption, extended instructions, prime number finding, floating point math, integer math, multithread, physics, random string sorting, and single-thread tests. The margins range from 4% (single-thread) to 42.2% (data encryption). This makes Intel the superior choice for any application that benefits from high core counts, high clocks, or heavy parallel throughput. Workloads like video encoding, 3D rendering, scientific simulation, and large-scale data processing would all favor Intel based on these numbers.

AMD's wins are more contextual. It has a higher average benchmark score (74496 vs. 70163) and matches Intel's 94th percentile. Its 28 W TDP versus Intel's 125 W suggests it is designed for power-constrained mobile environments where Intel's desktop chip cannot operate. The integrated Radeon 890M graphics means AMD offers a complete processor package without needing a discrete GPU, which is irrelevant for Intel since it has no integrated graphics. AMD's smaller process node (4 nm) and die size (233 mm² vs. 257 mm²) point to a more modern fabrication approach.

The single-thread result is the closest call, with Intel ahead by only 4%. In applications that rely primarily on one or two threads, such as basic office work or light web browsing, the practical difference would be small. AMD also supports LPDDR5X memory, which is common in mobile platforms, while Intel's DDR4 support benefits desktop builders with existing memory. The verdict from the data: choose Intel for maximum performance, choose AMD for mobile integration, power efficiency, and a more compact, modern process node.