AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 vs Intel Core i7-14700T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 contains no individual benchmark scores, while the Intel Core i7-14700T carries a full set of Cinebench and PassMark results. This makes a direct score-by-score comparison impossible from the database. The Intel part shows a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25980 and a single-core score of 3667. In PassMark, the Intel chip records 30571 for multithread and 3905 for single-thread. The AMD processor's benchmark array is empty, which means the database has no measured outputs for the Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 at this time.

The Intel Core i7-14700T holds an average benchmark score of 41914, placing it at the 88th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals, all within a narrow band, confirm this positioning: the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS scores 41963 (0.1% higher), the AMD Ryzen 5 7400 scores 42055 (0.3% higher), the Intel Core i7-12850HX scores 41779 (0.3% lower), and the Intel Core 7 251TE scores 41650 (0.6% lower). The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475, by contrast, sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of 0. The database lists zero wins for the AMD part and zero wins for the Intel part in their head-to-head comparison, reflecting the absence of paired test data.

Because the Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 has no recorded scores, any head-to-head numeric analysis must rely solely on the Intel chip's measured performance and its percentile context. The Intel Core i7-14700T demonstrates a strong multi-threaded showing with a Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 25980, which aligns with its 20-core, 28-thread configuration. Its single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3667 indicates solid per-thread performance for a 35-watt processor. The PassMark data supports this: integer math scores 113854, floating point math scores 79042, and data compression scores 354216, all indicative of robust throughput in the desktop segment.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475, lacking benchmark entries, cannot be positioned relative to the Intel chip in any measured workload. The database shows no Cinebench or PassMark results for the AMD part, so no percentage deltas, no comparative wins, and no performance rankings exist for it. The only quantitative facts available are architectural: 12 cores, 24 threads, a 2.00 GHz base clock, a 5.20 GHz boost clock, and a 28-watt TDP.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 uses the Zen 5 architecture with the codename Gorgon Point, built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. Its generation is listed as Ryzen AI 400, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, indicating a hybrid core layout within a mobile-focused package. The die size measures 233 mm². The Intel Core i7-14700T uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-R, part of the Core 14th Gen series. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process at Intel, with a die size of 257 mm². The generation is Core i7, belonging to the Raptor Lake Refresh family.

Core counts differ markedly. The AMD part provides 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel part provides 20 cores and 28 threads. The Intel chip has a lower base clock at 1.30 GHz versus the AMD's 2.00 GHz, but both reach the same boost clock of 5.20 GHz. Cache hierarchies diverge in L2 and L3. The AMD processor has 1 MB of L2 per core and 16 MB of L3, while the Intel processor has 2 MB of L2 per core and 33 MB of shared L3. Both use 80 KB of L1 per core. The Intel chip's larger L3, nearly double the AMD's, likely contributes to its higher multi-threaded throughput in the recorded Cinebench results.

Process node and foundry differences are substantial. The AMD uses a 4 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel uses a 10 nm process at Intel. This gives the AMD part a denser transistor footprint despite a smaller die (233 mm² versus 257 mm²). However, the database does not list transistor counts for either chip, so the density advantage cannot be quantified.

Memory support differs. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with a dual-channel memory bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core i7-14700T supports DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but the database lists no memory bandwidth figure for the Intel part. The AMD chip does not support ECC memory, while the Intel chip does. PCIe generations differ: the AMD uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics also differ: the AMD uses Radeon 890M, while the Intel uses UHD Graphics 770.

Market segments distinguish the two. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 is a mobile processor, using the AMD Socket FP8. The Intel Core i7-14700T is a desktop processor, using the Intel Socket 1700. This placement affects thermal and power characteristics: the AMD has a 28-watt TDP, while the Intel has a 35-watt TDP. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part lists a part number of 100-000001859, while the Intel part lists SRN41.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear verdict for the Intel Core i7-14700T in any measured performance context, because it is the only processor with benchmark scores in the database. The Intel chip's average benchmark score of 41914 and its 88th percentile ranking place it firmly above the median. Its nearest rivals, all within 0.6% of its score, confirm that it competes near the top of the desktop CPU pool. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475, with an average benchmark score of 0 and a 50th percentile, has no recorded performance data to compare. The database cannot show any scenario where the AMD part wins a benchmark, because no benchmark results exist for it.

The Intel chip's 20 cores and 28 threads, combined with its 33 MB of shared L3, provide the structural basis for its strong multi-threaded scores. The Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 25980 and the PassMark multithread score of 30571 reflect this. The AMD's 12 cores and 24 threads, with 16 MB of L3, would likely yield lower multi-threaded results, but the database offers no numbers to substantiate that claim. Single-threaded performance is closer on paper, as both share a 5.20 GHz boost clock, but the Intel chip's measured single-core Cinebench R23 score of 3667 and PassMark single-thread score of 3905 stand as the only recorded evidence.

For a user choosing between these two, the database's recorded facts favor the Intel chip for any workload where benchmark scores matter. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $384, which can be stated once as a reference point. The AMD part has no launch MSRP in the database. The Intel chip's 88th percentile ranking versus the AMD's 50th percentile, based on average benchmark scores, is the single most decisive statistic available.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in the following recorded specifications:

• Cores: AMD 12, Intel 20
• Threads: AMD 24, Intel 28
• Base clock: AMD 2.00 GHz, Intel 1.30 GHz
• Boost clock: Both 5.20 GHz
• TDP: AMD 28 W, Intel 35 W
• Socket: AMD Socket FP8, Intel Socket 1700
• Architecture: Zen 5, Raptor Lake
• Codename: Gorgon Point, Raptor Lake-R
• Generation: Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c), Core i7 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
• Process node: 4 nm, 10 nm
• Foundry: TSMC, Intel
• Die size: 233 mm², 257 mm²
• L2 cache: 1 MB per core, 2 MB per core
• L3 cache: 16 MB, 33 MB (shared)
• Memory support: DDR5, LPDDR5X versus DDR4, DDR5
• Memory bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s (AMD), not listed (Intel)
• ECC memory: No (AMD), Yes (Intel)
• PCIe: Gen 4, 16 lanes versus Gen 5, 16 lanes
• Integrated graphics: Radeon 890M, UHD Graphics 770
• Market segment: Mobile, Desktop
• Launch MSRP: Not listed (AMD), $384 (Intel)
• Part number: 100-000001859, SRN41

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T has 20 cores and 28 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 has 12 cores and 24 threads.

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T has an average benchmark score of 41914. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 has an average benchmark score of 0.

Q: How does the Intel chip compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T is 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 8945HS, 0.3% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 7400, 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i7-12850HX, and 0.6% ahead of the Intel Core 7 251TE.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: No. The AMD chip supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: Which processor has ECC memory support?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700T supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 does not.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds for both processors?

A: Both the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 and the Intel Core i7-14700T have a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i7-14700T wins in every measured benchmark category, because it is the only processor with recorded scores. Its Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2618, R20 multi-core score of 10911, and R23 multi-core score of 25980 demonstrate sustained multi-threaded capability. PassMark results reinforce this across diverse workloads: data compression scores 354216, data encryption scores 21277, extended instructions scores 20052, find prime numbers scores 145, floating point math scores 79042, integer math scores 113854, multithread scores 30571, physics scores 1946, random string sorting scores 38546, and single-thread scores 3905. These numbers cover a broad set of computational tasks, from encryption to sorting to prime number generation, and the Intel chip delivers strong outputs in all of them.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 has no recorded wins in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 0 indicate no measured performance data exists. However, the AMD part does hold structural advantages that could matter in specific contexts, based on specifications alone. Its 4 nm process node at TSMC suggests higher transistor density compared to Intel's 10 nm process, which could translate to better power efficiency, though no efficiency benchmarks are recorded. Its 28-watt TDP is lower than Intel's 35-watt TDP, making it potentially better suited for thermally constrained mobile environments. Its memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is explicitly recorded, while the Intel chip has no listed bandwidth, so in memory-heavy mobile workloads the AMD part might have an edge, but the database provides no benchmark to confirm this.

The Intel chip's 88th percentile ranking versus the AMD's 50th percentile is the clearest differentiator. For desktop users who prioritize measured performance across Cinebench and PassMark suites, the Intel Core i7-14700T is the only chip with evidence in the database. For mobile users who prioritize lower TDP, smaller die size, and newer process technology, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 475 offers architectural advantages, but the absence of any benchmark scores means its actual performance cannot be validated from the recorded data. The verdict, strictly from the database, is that the Intel chip wins all measured comparisons, while the AMD chip's strengths remain speculative based on specifications rather than results.