AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 vs Intel Processor U301L Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare between the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 and the Intel Processor U301L?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 comes with 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Processor U301L has 5 cores and 6 threads. This gives the AMD part a 2.4x advantage in core count and a 4x advantage in thread count.

Q: What are the clock speed differences between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Intel Processor U301L operates at 1.20 GHz base and 2.20 GHz boost. The AMD chip's boost clock is more than double that of the Intel part.

Q: Which processor has a higher TDP and what socket does each use?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 has a TDP of 28 watts and uses AMD Socket FP8. The Intel Processor U301L has a TDP of 15 watts and uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD processor is rated for higher power delivery.

Q: What are the process nodes and foundries for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 is built on TSMC's 4 nm process node, while the Intel Processor U301L is fabricated on Intel's 10 nm process node. The AMD chip uses a smaller geometry, which typically allows for higher transistor density.

Q: Is there benchmark data available for both processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 has a comprehensive set of benchmark results across Cinebench and Passmark tests, with an average benchmark score of 58826 and a percentile rank of 92 among all CPUs. The Intel Processor U301L has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, with an average score of 0 and a percentile rank of 50.

Q: What integrated graphics does each processor feature?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 includes Radeon 890M graphics, while the Intel Processor U301L features UHD Graphics 64EU.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 and Intel Processor U301L represent fundamentally different architectural approaches. The AMD part is based on the Zen 5 architecture under the Gorgon Point codename, belonging to the Ryzen AI 400 generation that combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Processor U301L uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-PS codename, part of the Intel Processor generation built on Raptor Lake.

The manufacturing processes diverge significantly. AMD uses a 4 nm process node from TSMC, while Intel fabricates the U301L on a 10 nm node at its own foundry. The AMD chip's die size is listed at 233 mm², whereas no die size is recorded for the Intel part. This process advantage likely contributes to the substantial performance gap observed in benchmark data.

Cache hierarchies differ in structure. Both processors feature 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 has 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Processor U301L provides 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, which is slightly higher per core, but only 8 MB of shared L3 cache, half of what AMD offers. The larger shared L3 cache on the AMD chip can improve data locality across more cores.

Memory support also differentiates the two. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 in a dual-channel configuration, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded in the database. Neither processor supports ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity shows another difference. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel Processor U301L provides Gen 4 with only 8 lanes from the CPU. This gives the AMD chip double the PCIe lane count for connecting peripherals and expansion devices.

Both processors are unlocked multipliers, meaning their clock multipliers cannot be adjusted. The AMD chip has an active production status and was released in 2025, while the Intel part also has active production status with a release date in 2024.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark comparison heavily favors the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, though the Intel Processor U301L has no recorded scores in the database, making direct head-to-head comparisons rely on the AMD part's absolute performance and its standing among rivals.

In Cinebench R23 multi-core testing, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 scores 23491.5 points. The single-core score is 2066 points. In the older Cinebench R15 test, the AMD chip delivers 3518 points in multi-core and 317 points in single-core. These figures place the processor in the 92nd percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Passmark results for the AMD processor show strong performance across various workloads. The multi-thread score is 37010, while the single-thread score is 4124. In integer math, the chip achieves 130171, and in floating-point math it reaches 81320. Data compression scores 484584, while data encryption hits 23746. Extended instructions score 34365, and the find prime numbers test yields 125. Physics testing shows 1851 points, and random string sorting achieves 51576.

The average benchmark score of 58826 for the AMD processor places it in competitive territory. Among its nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 9645 has an average score of 58916, representing a delta of -0.2 percent, meaning the Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 trails it by a negligible margin. The Intel Xeon w5-2545 scores 58504 with a delta of 0.5 percent, indicating the Ryzen chip is 0.5 percent ahead. The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D scores 58386 with a delta of 0.8 percent, and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M scores 58323 with a delta of 0.9 percent.

This positioning shows the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 performing within a narrow band of roughly 1 percent above or below several high-end desktop and server processors. The data confirms that despite being a mobile processor with a 28-watt TDP, the AMD chip competes directly with much larger parts.

Since the Intel Processor U301L has no benchmark entries, the database cannot provide comparative scores for it. The Intel part's percentile rank of 50 among all CPUs suggests it sits at the median, but without recorded test results, a quantitative head-to-head comparison is not possible from the available data.

The Verdict

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 is the clear performance leader based on the recorded data. Its 92nd percentile ranking, combined with an average benchmark score of 58826, places it among the top processors in the database. The chip's nearest rivals all fall within 1 percent of its average score, showing that it delivers performance comparable to desktop-class Xeon and Ryzen 7 parts.

The Intel Processor U301L, with no benchmark scores and a median percentile rank of 50, cannot match the AMD processor's demonstrated capabilities. Its lower core count, thread count, and clock speeds indicate a more modest performance envelope. The Intel chip does offer a lower 15-watt TDP compared to AMD's 28 watts, which may suit power-constrained designs.

For workloads that benefit from high multi-threaded performance, the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 with 24 threads and a 5.20 GHz boost clock is the appropriate choice. Its 16 MB of L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth support demanding applications. The Intel Processor U301L, with 6 threads and a 2.20 GHz boost clock, targets basic computing tasks where power efficiency takes priority over raw throughput.

The AMD chip also provides more PCIe lanes at 16 versus 8, and its 4 nm process node from TSMC suggests newer manufacturing technology. The Intel part's support for DDR4 in addition to DDR5 offers flexibility for systems using older memory types.

Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not an option for either. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 launched without a recorded MSRP, while the Intel Processor U301L has a launch MSRP of $107.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 | Intel Processor U301L |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Cores | 12 | 5 |

| Threads | 24 | 6 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.20 GHz | 2.20 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 15 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 5 | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-PS |

| Generation | Ryzen AI 400 (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Intel Processor (Raptor Lake) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | Not recorded |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 8 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 890M | UHD Graphics 64EU |

| Release Date | 2025 | 2024 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $107 |

| Part Number | 100-000001936 | SRPKFQ5CW |