AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 vs Intel Core i5-14501TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database does not contain direct head-to-head benchmark runs between the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 and the Intel Core i5-14501TE. Instead, it provides a full benchmark profile for the AMD part and no recorded benchmark scores for the Intel part. This makes a direct per-test comparison impossible. What can be analyzed is the AMD processor's absolute performance across multiple workloads, and where the Intel processor's specifications place it based on its percentile ranking.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23491.5 and a single-core score of 2066. In Cinebench R15, it records 3518 multi-core and 317 single-core. These results indicate a high-throughput part. The PassMark suite shows a multithread score of 37010, integer math at 130171, floating point math at 81320, and extended instructions at 34365. Data compression reaches 484584, while encryption hits 23746. Random string sorting scores 51576. The single-thread PassMark score is 4124, and the find prime numbers test records 125. Physics scores 1851.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE has no benchmark entries in the database. Its percentile versus all CPUs is 50, meaning it sits at the median of recorded processors. The AMD part's percentile is 92, which places it well above the median. The average benchmark score for the AMD chip is 58826. The Intel chip's average benchmark score is 0, reflecting the absence of recorded data. Any statement about the Intel part's performance must rely on its position in the database, not on measured scores.

The AMD processor's nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 9645 with an average score of 58916 and a delta of -0.2 percent, the Intel Xeon w5-2545 with 58504 and a delta of 0.5 percent, the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D with 58386 and a delta of 0.8 percent, and the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M with 58323 and a delta of 0.9 percent. These deltas are all within one percent, indicating that the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 performs essentially on par with these four processors in aggregate benchmark averages. The AMD chip sits slightly below the Ryzen 5 PRO 9645, and slightly above the three Intel Xeon parts and the Ryzen 7 9850X3D. This clustering suggests that the AMD processor's overall performance is competitive with a broad set of workstation and server-class chips, despite its mobile market segment.

Because the Intel Core i5-14501TE has no recorded benchmarks, the head-to-head section must state plainly: the data does not support any comparative benchmark claims. The only measurable differences come from the AMD side. The AMD part's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23491.5 and single-core score of 2066 establish a performance floor for high-thread count and light-thread workloads, respectively. The PassMark multithread score of 37010 reinforces the multi-core strength. The single-thread PassMark score of 4124 shows a capable single-core result as well.

For the Intel part, the database records no scores, so no wins or losses can be assigned. The wins counter for both processors is 0. The analysis must treat the Intel part as an unmeasured entry, with its 50th percentile indicating a mid-pack standing among all CPUs, but no specific workload data to confirm or deny any particular strength.

FAQ

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14501TE have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The database lists an empty benchmark array for the Intel Core i5-14501TE. Its average benchmark score is 0, and it has no nearest rivals recorded. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470, by contrast, has 15 benchmark entries across Cinebench and PassMark tests.

Q: What is the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470's best multi-core result?

A: The highest multi-core result recorded is the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23491.5. The PassMark multithread score is 37010, and Cinebench R15 multi-core is 3518. These three tests all measure multi-threaded throughput.

Q: How does the AMD processor compare to its nearest rivals in average score?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 has an average benchmark score of 58826. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 9645, scores 58916, which is 0.2 percent higher. The Intel Xeon w5-2545 scores 58504, 0.5 percent lower. The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D scores 58386, 0.8 percent lower. The Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M scores 58323, 0.9 percent lower. All differences are under one percent.

Q: What percentile ranking does each processor hold?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 ranks at the 92nd percentile among all CPUs in the database. The Intel Core i5-14501TE ranks at the 50th percentile. This places the AMD part well above the median and the Intel part exactly at the median.

Q: Does the Intel processor support ECC memory?

A: Yes. The Intel Core i5-14501TE lists ECC memory support as true. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 lists ECC memory support as false.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel Core i5-14501TE supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use a dual-channel memory bus. The AMD part has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part has no bandwidth figure in the database.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the codename Gorgon Point. It belongs to the Ryzen AI 400 generation, which combines Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The Intel Core i5-14501TE uses Raptor Lake architecture under the codename Raptor Lake-R, part of the Core 14th Gen series and the Raptor Lake Refresh generation.

The process nodes differ significantly. The AMD chip is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel chip is built on a 10 nm process at Intel. This difference in fabrication process is a primary architectural distinction, affecting transistor density and power characteristics. The AMD die size is 233 mm², while the Intel die size is 215 mm². The AMD part has a TDP of 28, while the Intel part has a TDP of 45. The AMD part is classified as mobile, while the Intel part is classified as desktop.

Core and thread counts diverge sharply. The AMD processor has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel processor has 6 cores and 12 threads. The AMD part's base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Intel part's base clock is 2.20 GHz with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel part starts with a higher base clock but has a slightly lower boost clock.

Cache configurations differ. Both processors use 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The L2 cache differs: the AMD part has 1 MB per core, while the Intel part has 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache is notably different. The AMD chip has 16 MB of L3 cache, while the Intel chip has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. This gives the Intel part a larger total last-level cache despite having fewer cores.

Memory support differs in both type and bandwidth. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a recorded bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5, but no bandwidth figure is recorded. ECC memory is supported on the Intel part but not on the AMD part. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

PCIe support also differs. The AMD processor uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes, CPU only. The Intel processor uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, CPU only. This is a notable generational difference in interconnect speed. The integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD part uses Radeon 890M graphics, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 770.

The sockets are incompatible. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part has no unlocked multiplier, and the Intel part also has no unlocked multiplier. The release dates differ: the AMD part was released at the end of 2025, while the Intel part was released in mid-2024. The AMD part's part number is 100-000001936, and the Intel part's is Q49KSRNJN.

The Verdict

The data shows two processors with very different profiles. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 is a 12-core, 24-thread mobile processor with a 92nd percentile ranking, a 4 nm process, and a 28 TDP. It has extensive benchmark coverage, with strong multi-core and single-core results across Cinebench and PassMark. The Intel Core i5-14501TE is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor with a 50th percentile ranking, a 10 nm process, and a 45 TDP. It has no benchmark scores in the database.

For users who rely on measured performance data, the AMD processor is the only one with recorded results. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23491.5 and PassMark multithread score of 37010 indicate a high-throughput part. Its average benchmark score of 58826 places it in line with several Xeon and Ryzen workstation processors, all within one percent. The 92nd percentile confirms that it outperforms the vast majority of recorded CPUs.

The Intel processor, with its 50th percentile, sits exactly at the median. Without any benchmark scores, the database provides no evidence of its workload-specific performance. Its 6 cores and 12 threads are half the core and thread counts of the AMD part. Its 24 MB of L3 cache is larger, and its PCIe Gen 5 support is newer, but these specifications do not translate into measured scores in the database.

The verdict from the data is straightforward: the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 delivers measurable performance that places it in the top eight percent of all CPUs, with multi-core scores that rival workstation-class processors. The Intel Core i5-14501TE lacks any measured results, so its performance cannot be quantified from the database. A user requiring verified benchmark numbers would choose the AMD part. A user who needs ECC memory support, DDR4 compatibility, or PCIe Gen 5 would find those features only on the Intel part, but with no performance data to validate the trade-off.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every major specification field. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 has 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads. The AMD base clock is 2.00 GHz, and its boost clock is 5.20 GHz. The Intel base clock is 2.20 GHz, and its boost clock is 5.10 GHz. The AMD TDP is 28, while the Intel TDP is 45.

The socket differs: AMD Socket FP8 for the AMD part, Intel Socket 1700 for the Intel part. The architecture is Zen 5 for AMD and Raptor Lake for Intel. The process node is 4 nm for AMD and 10 nm for Intel. The die size is 233 mm² for AMD and 215 mm² for Intel. The L1 cache is the same at 80 KB per core. The L2 cache is 1 MB per core for AMD and 1.25 MB per core for Intel. The L3 cache is 16 MB for AMD and 24 MB shared for Intel.

Memory support differs. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s, while Intel has no recorded bandwidth. ECC memory is false for AMD and true for Intel. Both use dual-channel memory. PCIe is Gen 4 with 16 lanes for AMD and Gen 5 with 16 lanes for Intel. Integrated graphics are Radeon 890M for AMD and UHD Graphics 770 for Intel. The market segment is mobile for AMD and desktop for Intel. The release date is late 2025 for AMD and mid-2024 for Intel. Neither has a launch MSRP in the database, and neither has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 wins in every category where measured data exists. Its 12 cores and 24 threads provide a 2x advantage in core and thread counts over the Intel part. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23491.5, PassMark multithread score of 37010, and average benchmark score of 58826 are all recorded strengths. The 92nd percentile versus the Intel part's 50th percentile is a clear database ranking win. The 4 nm process and 28 TDP suggest higher efficiency in the mobile segment. The Radeon 890M integrated graphics are a different class of iGPU compared to the UHD Graphics 770, though no graphics benchmarks are recorded.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE wins in specific specification areas, but not in measured performance. It has a higher base clock at 2.20 GHz versus 2.00 GHz. It has more L2 cache per core at 1.25 MB versus 1 MB. It has more total L3 cache at 24 MB versus 16 MB. It supports ECC memory, which the AMD part does not. It supports DDR4 as well as DDR5, offering broader memory compatibility. It uses PCIe Gen 5, which is a newer standard than the AMD part's PCIe Gen 4. It has a larger TDP of 45, which may allow for sustained desktop operation under a more robust cooling solution. Its release date is earlier, meaning it has been available for a longer period.

For workload selection, the AMD processor is the choice for multi-threaded compute tasks: rendering, compilation, simulation, and data processing. Its Cinebench and PassMark multi-core scores are the only measured evidence of such capability. The Intel processor offers no benchmark evidence, so it cannot be recommended for any specific workload based on the database. Its ECC support and DDR4 compatibility point to reliability-focused desktop builds, but without scores, the database cannot confirm its performance in those roles. The AMD part wins all measured workloads by default. The Intel part wins on features like ECC and PCIe Gen 5, but those are specification wins, not performance wins.