AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 vs Intel Processor 300T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive performance gap between the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 and the Intel Processor 300T. The AMD part holds a substantial lead across every measured workload category, though direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons are not available in the database for these two specific processors. The Intel Processor 300T has no recorded benchmark scores, while the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 has a full suite of 15 benchmark results covering rendering, encryption, compression, and mathematical workloads.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 23491.5 and a single-core score of 2066. The Intel Processor 300T does not have recorded Cinebench scores in the database, making direct comparison impossible. However, the AMD part's multi-threaded PassMark score of 37010 and single-thread score of 4124 establish a strong baseline for its performance class.

In the absence of Intel benchmark data, the AMD processor can be contextualized through its nearest rivals. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 scores 0.2% below the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 9645 in average benchmark score, 0.5% above the Intel Xeon w5-2545, 0.8% above the AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D, and 0.9% above the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M. These deltas place the Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 in a tightly contested performance band around the 58500 to 59000 average score range, with its own average benchmark score of 58826.

The Intel Processor 300T has an average benchmark score of 0 and no nearest rivals recorded, indicating an absence of measured data rather than a competitive parity. Its 50th percentile ranking across all CPUs stands in contrast to the AMD part's 92nd percentile, a gap that reflects both the lack of recorded scores and the fundamentally different core configurations of the two processors.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 wins in every benchmark category where data exists. Its Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 3518 and single-core score of 317 demonstrate strong rendering capability. The R23 results reinforce this, with the multi-core score of 23491.5 indicating sustained throughput across all 24 threads.

PassMark results show specific workload strengths. The data compression score of 484584 is the highest recorded figure across the AMD part's benchmark suite, indicating exceptional performance in compression and decompression tasks. Integer math scores of 130171 and floating point math scores of 81320 show balanced arithmetic processing. Extended instructions score 34365, while data encryption reaches 23746. Random string sorting completes the workload profile at 51576.

The Intel Processor 300T, with its 2 cores and 4 threads, cannot claim any benchmark wins from the recorded data. Its lack of recorded scores means the database contains no evidence of competitive performance in any measured category. The processor's 35 W TDP and desktop market segment positioning suggest a different usage profile, but the absence of benchmark results prevents any quantitative analysis of its capabilities.

The AMD part's physics score of 1851 and find prime numbers score of 125 complete its recorded workload coverage. These figures, combined with the multi-thread score of 37010, establish the Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 as a processor that delivers consistent results across both synthetic and application-oriented benchmarks. The Intel Processor 300T's 50th percentile ranking, derived without any recorded benchmark scores, leaves its performance envelope entirely unquantified in the database.

The Verdict

The data directs a clear conclusion. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 is the only processor in this comparison with measured performance, and its 92nd percentile ranking places it in the upper tier of all CPUs tracked in the database. The Intel Processor 300T's 50th percentile ranking, based on no recorded benchmark scores, does not support any performance claims.

For workloads covered by the benchmark suite, the AMD processor's 12 cores and 24 threads provide the computational foundation for its recorded results. The Intel Processor's 2 cores and 4 threads represent a fundamentally smaller parallel processing capacity, though the database contains no measurements to quantify the practical impact of this difference.

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 targets the mobile segment with a 28 W TDP, while the Intel Processor 300T is a desktop part with a 35 W TDP. The AMD processor uses the newer Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process, while the Intel part uses Raptor Lake on Intel's 10 nm process. These architectural differences align with the performance gap suggested by the benchmark data, though the Intel part's lack of recorded scores prevents definitive comparison.

Selecting between these processors based on database evidence favors the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 without qualification. Its measured performance across 15 benchmarks, its 92nd percentile standing, and its competitive position within 1% of four established server and desktop processors all confirm its capability. The Intel Processor 300T, with no recorded scores and no rival comparisons, cannot be evaluated on the same terms.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 has an average benchmark score of 58826.

Q: Does the Intel Processor 300T have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the Intel Processor 300T has no recorded benchmark scores in the database.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 9645?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 scores 0.2% below the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 9645 in average benchmark score.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Processor 300T has 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 has a TDP of 28 W. The Intel Processor 300T has a TDP of 35 W.

Q: What is the Intel Processor 300T's launch MSRP?

A: The Intel Processor 300T has a launch MSRP of $82.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 uses the Zen 5 architecture under the Gorgon Point codename, part of the Ryzen AI 400 generation that employs both Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Processor 300T uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-S codename, part of the Intel Processor generation. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel with a die size of 163 mm².

Core configurations differ substantially. The AMD processor provides 12 cores and 24 threads, with base and boost clocks of 2.00 GHz and 5.20 GHz respectively. The Intel processor provides 2 cores and 4 threads, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and no recorded boost clock.

Cache hierarchies share the same per-core L1 size of 80 KB, but diverge beyond that. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 per core and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 1.25 MB of L2 per core and 6 MB of shared L3 cache.

Memory support differs by platform. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus with 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, with no memory bandwidth figure recorded. Neither processor supports ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity also differs. The AMD processor uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel processor uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics differ as well: the AMD part includes the Radeon 890M, while the Intel part includes UHD Graphics 710.

Socket and market positioning complete the architectural picture. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 uses AMD Socket FP8 and targets the mobile segment. The Intel Processor 300T uses Intel Socket 1700 and targets the desktop segment. The AMD processor was released on 2025-12-31T17:00:00.000Z, while the Intel processor was released on 2024-01-07T17:00:00.000Z. Both processors are currently active in production, and neither has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part number is 100-000001936, and the Intel part number is SRN3K.