AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE vs Intel Core 7 360 Comparison

AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE and Intel Core 7 360 occupy different corners of the processor landscape. The AMD part is a desktop chip built for the AM5 socket, while the Intel part is a mobile processor soldered to the board. The database shows one of these processors has a full benchmark suite recorded, while the other has no test scores yet. That asymmetry shapes what can be said about their relative performance.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core 7 360 has 6 cores and 6 threads. The AMD processor offers more than twice the thread count.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE boosts to 5.10 GHz, while the Intel Core 7 360 boosts to 4.80 GHz. The AMD chip has a 0.30 GHz higher maximum clock.

Q: Which processor has a higher thermal design power?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE has a TDP of 35 watts. The Intel Core 7 360 has a TDP of 15 watts. The Intel chip draws less than half the power budget.

Q: Do both processors support the same memory types?

A: Yes, both support DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory. However, the AMD processor uses a dual-channel memory bus with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth, while the Intel processor uses a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which processor has a higher benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core 7 360 sits at the 72nd percentile among all CPUs in the database. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE sits at the 50th percentile. However, the AMD chip has no recorded benchmark scores, so this comparison is based on incomplete data.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core 7 360?

A: The launch MSRP is $426. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE has no listed launch MSRP in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different manufacturing processes and design philosophies. AMD builds the Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE on a 4 nm process node from TSMC, using the Gorgon Point codename and the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation with Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. Intel builds the Core 7 360 on a 3 nm process node from its own foundry, using the Wildcat Lake codename and the Core 5 generation.

The cache hierarchy differs substantially. AMD assigns 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 8 MB L3 cache. Intel assigns 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 2.5 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 6 MB L3 cache. The Intel design has larger per-core L1 and L2 allocations, while the AMD design has a larger shared L3 pool.

Memory architecture diverges as well. AMD uses a dual-channel memory bus capable of 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. Intel uses a single-channel bus with 59.7 GB/s bandwidth. Both support DDR5 and LPDDR5X modules, but AMD also supports ECC memory while Intel does not. The physical footprint differs: AMD uses Socket AM5 with a 195 mm² die size, while Intel uses BGA 1516 with no recorded die size.

PCIe connectivity shows another gap. AMD provides Gen 4 with 12 lanes from the CPU. Intel provides Gen 4 with 6 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics also differ: AMD uses Radeon 860M, while Intel uses Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries between these two processors. All benchmark scores listed belong exclusively to the Intel Core 7 360. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE has an empty benchmark array, no average score, and no nearest rivals recorded.

Focusing on the Intel data, the Cinebench R15 multicore score is 1374, with a single-core score of 193. In Cinebench R20, the multicore score rises to 5726 and single-core reaches 808. Cinebench R23 shows a multicore score of 13634 and single-core of 1924. These numbers indicate a processor that scales reasonably across workloads but has limited thread capacity given its 6-core, 6-thread configuration.

PassMark results from the Intel chip cover several specialized workloads. Data compression scores 142877, data encryption scores 11164, and extended instructions score 12390. Floating point math reaches 44963, integer math reaches 34238, and multithread performance scores 15544. Physics tests produce 1213, random string sorting produces 17636, and single-thread performance scores 4274. The find prime numbers test yields 120.

The Intel chip has an average benchmark score of 18374. Its nearest rivals in the database are Intel Core i3-13100 with an average score of 18380, Intel Core 5 330 with 18345, Intel Core i3-14100 with 18318, and Intel Core 3 305 with 18302. The delta percentages are 0, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 respectively, meaning the Core 7 360 sits within a tight cluster around these comparable processors.

Without recorded scores for the AMD chip, direct numerical comparison is impossible. The available data shows the Intel processor performs at a level consistent with its peer group, but nothing in the database quantifies how the AMD processor would fare in the same tests.

Specification Differences

The specification table reveals several clear distinctions between the two processors.

Core count: AMD has 8 cores, Intel has 6 cores. Thread count: AMD has 16 threads, Intel has 6 threads. Base clock: AMD runs at 2.00 GHz, Intel at 1.50 GHz. Boost clock: AMD reaches 5.10 GHz, Intel reaches 4.80 GHz. TDP: AMD draws 35 watts, Intel draws 15 watts.

Socket: AMD uses AM5, Intel uses BGA 1516. Process node: AMD uses 4 nm from TSMC, Intel uses 3 nm from its own foundry. Codename: AMD is Gorgon Point, Intel is Wildcat Lake. Generation: AMD is Ryzen AI PRO 400 with Zen 5 and Zen 5c, Intel is Core 5 with Wildcat Lake.

L1 cache per core: AMD has 80 KB, Intel has 192 KB. L2 cache per core: AMD has 1 MB, Intel has 2.5 MB. L3 cache: AMD has 8 MB, Intel has 6 MB shared. Memory bus: AMD is dual-channel, Intel is single-channel. Memory bandwidth: AMD has 89.6 GB/s, Intel has 59.7 GB/s. ECC support: AMD supports it, Intel does not.

PCIe lanes: AMD provides 12, Intel provides 6. Both use Gen 4. Integrated graphics: AMD uses Radeon 860M, Intel uses Xe3 Graphics with 2 Xe cores. Market segment: AMD is Desktop, Intel is Mobile. Production status: both are Active. Release date: AMD launched March 2026, Intel launched April 2026.

Die size: AMD measures 195 mm², Intel has no recorded die size. Launch MSRP: Intel lists at $426, AMD has none. Part numbers: AMD is 100-000001921, Intel is SAE3E. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core 7 360 wins in efficiency and portability. Its 15 watt TDP makes it suitable for thin mobile chassis, and the single-channel memory bus reduces power further. The 3 nm process node from Intel represents a smaller manufacturing geometry than the 4 nm node used by AMD. The larger per-core L1 and L2 caches suggest a design tuned for latency-sensitive single-threaded work. The recorded benchmark scores confirm it performs near the level of Intel Core i3-13100 and Intel Core i3-14100, both of which are well-known desktop parts.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE wins in raw thread capacity and memory bandwidth. Its 8 cores and 16 threads double the thread count of the Intel part. The dual-channel memory bus delivers 89.6 GB/s compared to 59.7 GB/s for Intel, a 50 percent advantage in theoretical bandwidth. The 5.10 GHz boost clock is higher than the Intel maximum of 4.80 GHz. The AM5 socket provides upgrade flexibility, and the 12 PCIe lanes offer more expansion headroom than the 6 lanes on the Intel chip. ECC memory support adds reliability for certain workloads.

The desktop versus mobile split defines the practical use cases. AMD targets desktop systems where power limits are less restrictive and multi-threaded throughput matters more. Intel targets mobile systems where battery life and thermal constraints dominate. The 35 watt TDP of the AMD chip requires active cooling, while the 15 watt TDP of the Intel chip could potentially operate with passive cooling in some chassis.

The Intel part has a clear advantage in the database percentile ranking, sitting at the 72nd percentile versus the 50th percentile for AMD. However, this ranking is based on Intel having actual benchmark scores while AMD has none. The percentile for AMD reflects an unknown baseline, not measured results.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear but partial picture. The Intel Core 7 360 has a complete benchmark record showing solid performance in Cinebench and PassMark workloads. Its average score of 18374 places it among comparable Intel processors with tiny deltas of 0 to 0.4 percent. For users who need a mobile processor with low power draw, the 15 watt TDP and single-channel memory design make it a compelling choice.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450GE lacks any recorded benchmark scores, so its performance cannot be quantified from the database. Its specifications suggest strengths in multi-threaded scenarios: 16 threads, dual-channel memory, and a higher boost clock. The 35 watt TDP and desktop socket indicate a different intended environment than the Intel mobile chip.

For desktop workloads that benefit from many threads and high memory bandwidth, the AMD processor appears better suited based on its specification sheet. For mobile devices requiring minimal power consumption and adequate single-thread performance, the Intel processor has demonstrated results that support its use.

The absence of head-to-head benchmark data means no definitive performance ranking emerges. The database shows the Intel chip performing in line with its nearest rivals, all of which are Intel parts. The AMD chip remains an unknown quantity until its benchmark suite is populated. Buyers choosing between these two should note the fundamental platform difference: one is a desktop processor, the other is a mobile processor. Their respective sockets and TDP ratings preclude direct comparison in the same system.