AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G vs Intel Core i5-14500 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded benchmark data covers only the Intel Core i5-14500, as the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G has no entries in the database. The Intel processor's scores provide a reference point against its nearest rivals, while the AMD part's absence of measurement data prevents direct numerical comparison.

The Intel Core i5-14500 produces an average benchmark score of 38,531, placing it at the 86th percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its closest competitor, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T, scores 38,561, a margin of 0.1% in that rival's favor. The gap is effectively negligible, indicating that the i5-14500 and the Core Ultra 5 235T trade blows within measurement noise.

Against the Intel Xeon w3-2525, which scores 38,392, the i5-14500 leads by 0.4%. This advantage extends to the Intel Core 9 270H at 38,335, where the i5-14500 is ahead by 0.5%, and the Intel Core Ultra 9 285H at 38,312, where the lead grows to 0.6%. These deltas are small in absolute terms, but the consistent upward trend shows the i5-14500 holding a slight edge over each successive rival in the list.

In single-threaded workloads, the i5-14500 records a PassMark single-thread score of 3,952. Its Cinebench R23 single-core result is 1,917, while Geekbench single-core reaches 2,099. The Cinebench R20 single-core score is 1,550, and the older R15 single-core test yields 273. These figures establish the processor's per-core capability, though without AMD data, the comparison remains one-sided.

Multi-threaded performance on the i5-14500 is substantial. Cinebench R23 multi-core produces 15,012, R20 multi-core hits 10,985, and R15 multi-core lands at 2,435. Geekbench multi-core scores 13,390, while PassMark multithread reaches 30,777. The processor's 14 cores and 20 threads drive these results, with the hybrid architecture contributing to the throughput.

Specialized workloads show distinct strengths. PassMark integer math scores 108,124, floating-point math reaches 79,576, and extended instructions hit 22,473. Data encryption completes at 21,457, while data compression records 371,294. Physics simulation scores 1,746, and prime number finding produces 106. Random string sorting finishes at 40,980. Each metric reflects a different aspect of computational capability, and the i5-14500's scores sit comfortably within the expected range for its class.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G, with zero benchmark entries and an average score of 0, cannot be evaluated numerically against the Intel part. Its percentile ranking of 50, derived from the database's overall distribution, suggests a mid-pack position, but this figure does not correspond to any measured performance data. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the win counts for both processors stand at zero.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14500 demonstrates clear strengths across every measured workload in the database. Its 14 cores, comprising performance and efficiency cores, deliver strong multi-threaded throughput, as shown by the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 15,012 and the PassMark multithread result of 30,777. Content creation tasks that leverage many threads, such as video encoding or 3D rendering, would benefit from this configuration, though the database does not include those specific tests.

Single-thread performance on the i5-14500 is equally robust. The Geekbench single-core score of 2,099 and the Cinebench R23 single-core result of 1,917 indicate responsive per-core behavior. Applications that rely on a few fast threads, such as web browsing or office productivity, would see solid performance from these figures.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G lacks any recorded wins because no benchmarks exist for it. Its 8 cores and 16 threads suggest capability in both single-threaded and multi-threaded scenarios, but the database cannot confirm this. The processor's boost clock of 5.10 GHz exceeds the i5-14500's 5.00 GHz, which could favor the AMD part in lightly threaded tasks, yet no data supports this hypothesis. Similarly, the AMD part's 8 MB of L3 cache is smaller than the Intel processor's 24 MB, potentially impacting cache-sensitive workloads, but again, measurements are absent.

For users with access to measured data, the i5-14500 wins in every category available. The AMD part's strengths remain theoretical, grounded only in its specifications rather than empirical results.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G uses the Gorgon Point codename, part of the Ryzen AI PRO 400 generation built on the Zen 5 and Zen 5c architecture. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 195 mm². The processor contains 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. Its thermal design power is 65 watts, matching the Intel part's TDP.

The Intel Core i5-14500 belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, using the Raptor Lake-R codename and the Raptor Lake Refresh architecture. It is built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm². The processor packs 14 cores and 20 threads, with a base clock of 2.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Its TDP is also 65 watts.

Cache hierarchies differ significantly. The AMD part provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel processor offers 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and a larger 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part's additional L3 capacity can improve hit rates for working sets that exceed the AMD processor's smaller pool.

Memory support diverges as well. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus, with a measured memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core i5-14500 supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also over a dual-channel bus, though no bandwidth figure is recorded. Both processors support ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity favors Intel. The i5-14500 provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while the AMD part offers Gen 4 with 12 lanes from the CPU. This gives the Intel processor a generational advantage in bandwidth and more lanes for expansion devices.

Integrated graphics differ in naming and capability. The AMD part includes Radeon 860M graphics, while the Intel processor ships with UHD Graphics 770. Neither has recorded benchmark data for GPU performance in the database.

The processors mount on different sockets: the AMD part uses AMD Socket AM5, and the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD processor's production status is active, with a release date of March 2026, while the Intel processor is also active, released in January 2024. The Intel part carries a launch MSRP of $232. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500 has 14 cores and 20 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds for each processor?

A: The AMD processor boosts to 5.10 GHz, and the Intel processor boosts to 5.00 GHz. The AMD part holds a 0.10 GHz advantage in maximum clock speed.

Q: How does L3 cache compare between the two?

A: The Intel Core i5-14500 has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G has 8 MB of L3 cache. The Intel processor offers three times the L3 capacity.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

Q: Does the AMD processor have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G has no benchmark entries and an average score of 0. The Intel Core i5-14500 has a full suite of recorded scores, including Cinebench R23 multi-core at 15,012 and Geekbench single-core at 2,099.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: Both processors have a thermal design power of 65 watts.

The Verdict

The database contains comprehensive measurements for the Intel Core i5-14500, and those numbers define its performance profile. With an average benchmark score of 38,531 and a percentile ranking of 86, the processor sits comfortably above most CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235T, Intel Xeon w3-2525, Intel Core 9 270H, and Intel Core Ultra 9 285H, all fall within 0.6% of its score, confirming that the i5-14500 competes at a specific performance tier where small margins separate entries.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450G cannot be assessed through measured performance because the database holds no benchmark results for it. Its specifications indicate a capable processor: 8 cores, 16 threads, a 5.10 GHz boost clock, and a 4 nm process node. These features suggest it could handle mainstream workloads, but without recorded scores, any claim about its performance relative to the i5-14500 would lack empirical support.

Users who require verified performance data should select the Intel Core i5-14500, as its benchmark results demonstrate strong multi-threaded throughput and solid single-core responsiveness. The processor's 14 cores and 20 threads provide a clear advantage in threaded workloads, and its 24 MB of L3 cache supports memory-intensive applications. The AMD part's 8 MB of L3 cache and 8 cores position it as a lower-thread-count option, but the absence of measurements leaves its real-world behavior unspecified.

The Intel processor's release in January 2024 and its active production status mean it is a current product with a recorded launch MSRP of $232. The AMD processor's release date of March 2026 places it as a newer entry, though its production status is also active. For anyone relying on database benchmarks to make a selection, the Intel Core i5-14500 is the only option with data to support a decision.